Instead of returning a bool to indicate success and a separate
SDValue, return the SDValue and have the callers check if it is
null.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112331
There is no need to return a bool and have an SDValue output
parameter. Just return the SDValue and let the caller check if it
is null.
I have another patch to add more callers of these so I thought
I'd clean up the interface first.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112267
This patch adds codegen support for lowering the vector-predicated
reduction intrinsics to RVV instructions. The process is similar to that
of the other reduction intrinsics, save for the fact that every VP
reduction has a start value. We reuse the existing custom "VL" nodes,
adding extra patterns where required to handle non-true masks.
To support these nodes, the `RISCVISD::VECREDUCE_*_VL` nodes have been
given an explicit "merge" operand. This is to faciliate the VP
reductions, where we must be careful to ensure that even if no operation
is performed (when VL=0) we still produce the start value. The RVV
reductions don't update the destination register under these conditions,
so we tie the splatted start value to the output register.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107657
Soft deprecrate isNullValue/isAllOnesValue and update in tree
callers. This matches the changes to the APInt interface from
D109483.
Reviewed By: lattner
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109535
This renames the primary methods for creating a zero value to `getZero`
instead of `getNullValue` and renames predicates like `isAllOnesValue`
to simply `isAllOnes`. This achieves two things:
1) This starts standardizing predicates across the LLVM codebase,
following (in this case) ConstantInt. The word "Value" doesn't
convey anything of merit, and is missing in some of the other things.
2) Calling an integer "null" doesn't make any sense. The original sin
here is mine and I've regretted it for years. This moves us to calling
it "zero" instead, which is correct!
APInt is widely used and I don't think anyone is keen to take massive source
breakage on anything so core, at least not all in one go. As such, this
doesn't actually delete any entrypoints, it "soft deprecates" them with a
comment.
Included in this patch are changes to a bunch of the codebase, but there are
more. We should normalize SelectionDAG and other APIs as well, which would
make the API change more mechanical.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109483
This patch adds support for the vector-predicated `VP_STORE` and
`VP_LOAD` nodes. We do this in the same way we lower `MSTORE` and
`MLOAD`: to regular load/store instructions via intrinsics.
One necessary change was made to `SelectionDAGLegalize` so that
`VP_STORE` nodes' operation actions are taken from the stored "value"
operands, in the same vein as `STORE` or `MSTORE`.
Reviewed By: craig.topper, rogfer01
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108999
This patch adds support for the `VP_SCATTER` and `VP_GATHER` nodes by
lowering them to RVV's `vsox`/`vlux` instructions, respectively. This
process is almost identical to the existing `MSCATTER`/`MGATHER` support.
One extra change was made to `SelectionDAGLegalize` so that
`VP_SCATTER`'s operation action is derived from its stored "value"
operand rather than its return type (which is always the chain).
Reviewed By: craig.topper, rogfer01
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108987
Please refer to
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2021-September/152440.html
(and that whole thread.)
TLDR: the original patch had no prior RFC, yet it had some changes that
really need a proper RFC discussion. It won't be productive to discuss
such an RFC, once it's actually posted, while said patch is already
committed, because that introduces bias towards already-committed stuff,
and the tree is potentially in broken state meanwhile.
While the end result of discussion may lead back to the current design,
it may also not lead to the current design.
Therefore i take it upon myself
to revert the tree back to last known good state.
This reverts commit 4c4093e6e3.
This reverts commit 0a2b1ba33a.
This reverts commit d9873711cb.
This reverts commit 791006fb8c.
This reverts commit c22b64ef66.
This reverts commit 72ebcd3198.
This reverts commit 5fa6039a5f.
This reverts commit 9efda541bf.
This reverts commit 94d3ff09cf.
This is recommit of the patch 16ff91ebcc,
reverted in 0c28a7c990 because it had
an error in call of getFastMathFlags (base type should be FPMathOperator
but not Instruction). The original commit message is duplicated below:
Clang has builtin function '__builtin_isnan', which implements C
library function 'isnan'. This function now is implemented entirely in
clang codegen, which expands the function into set of IR operations.
There are three mechanisms by which the expansion can be made.
* The most common mechanism is using an unordered comparison made by
instruction 'fcmp uno'. This simple solution is target-independent
and works well in most cases. It however is not suitable if floating
point exceptions are tracked. Corresponding IEEE 754 operation and C
function must never raise FP exception, even if the argument is a
signaling NaN. Compare instructions usually does not have such
property, they raise 'invalid' exception in such case. So this
mechanism is unsuitable when exception behavior is strict. In
particular it could result in unexpected trapping if argument is SNaN.
* Another solution was implemented in https://reviews.llvm.org/D95948.
It is used in the cases when raising FP exceptions by 'isnan' is not
allowed. This solution implements 'isnan' using integer operations.
It solves the problem of exceptions, but offers one solution for all
targets, however some can do the check in more efficient way.
* Solution implemented by https://reviews.llvm.org/D96568 introduced a
hook 'clang::TargetCodeGenInfo::testFPKind', which injects target
specific code into IR. Now only SystemZ implements this hook and it
generates a call to target specific intrinsic function.
Although these mechanisms allow to implement 'isnan' with enough
efficiency, expanding 'isnan' in clang has drawbacks:
* The operation 'isnan' is hidden behind generic integer operations or
target-specific intrinsics. It complicates analysis and can prevent
some optimizations.
* IR can be created by tools other than clang, in this case treatment
of 'isnan' has to be duplicated in that tool.
Another issue with the current implementation of 'isnan' comes from the
use of options '-ffast-math' or '-fno-honor-nans'. If such option is
specified, 'fcmp uno' may be optimized to 'false'. It is valid
optimization in general, but it results in 'isnan' always returning
'false'. For example, in some libc++ implementations the following code
returns 'false':
std::isnan(std::numeric_limits<float>::quiet_NaN())
The options '-ffast-math' and '-fno-honor-nans' imply that FP operation
operands are never NaNs. This assumption however should not be applied
to the functions that check FP number properties, including 'isnan'. If
such function returns expected result instead of actually making
checks, it becomes useless in many cases. The option '-ffast-math' is
often used for performance critical code, as it can speed up execution
by the expense of manual treatment of corner cases. If 'isnan' returns
assumed result, a user cannot use it in the manual treatment of NaNs
and has to invent replacements, like making the check using integer
operations. There is a discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D18513#387418,
which also expresses the opinion, that limitations imposed by
'-ffast-math' should be applied only to 'math' functions but not to
'tests'.
To overcome these drawbacks, this change introduces a new IR intrinsic
function 'llvm.isnan', which realizes the check as specified by IEEE-754
and C standards in target-agnostic way. During IR transformations it
does not undergo undesirable optimizations. It reaches instruction
selection, where is lowered in target-dependent way. The lowering can
vary depending on options like '-ffast-math' or '-ffp-model' so the
resulting code satisfies requested semantics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104854
The LegalizeAction for this node should follow the logic for
`VECREDUCE_SEQ_FADD` and be determined using the vector operand's type.
here isn't an in-tree target that makes use of this, but I think it's safe to
say this is how it should behave, should a target want to customize the action
for this node.
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107478
Clang has builtin function '__builtin_isnan', which implements C
library function 'isnan'. This function now is implemented entirely in
clang codegen, which expands the function into set of IR operations.
There are three mechanisms by which the expansion can be made.
* The most common mechanism is using an unordered comparison made by
instruction 'fcmp uno'. This simple solution is target-independent
and works well in most cases. It however is not suitable if floating
point exceptions are tracked. Corresponding IEEE 754 operation and C
function must never raise FP exception, even if the argument is a
signaling NaN. Compare instructions usually does not have such
property, they raise 'invalid' exception in such case. So this
mechanism is unsuitable when exception behavior is strict. In
particular it could result in unexpected trapping if argument is SNaN.
* Another solution was implemented in https://reviews.llvm.org/D95948.
It is used in the cases when raising FP exceptions by 'isnan' is not
allowed. This solution implements 'isnan' using integer operations.
It solves the problem of exceptions, but offers one solution for all
targets, however some can do the check in more efficient way.
* Solution implemented by https://reviews.llvm.org/D96568 introduced a
hook 'clang::TargetCodeGenInfo::testFPKind', which injects target
specific code into IR. Now only SystemZ implements this hook and it
generates a call to target specific intrinsic function.
Although these mechanisms allow to implement 'isnan' with enough
efficiency, expanding 'isnan' in clang has drawbacks:
* The operation 'isnan' is hidden behind generic integer operations or
target-specific intrinsics. It complicates analysis and can prevent
some optimizations.
* IR can be created by tools other than clang, in this case treatment
of 'isnan' has to be duplicated in that tool.
Another issue with the current implementation of 'isnan' comes from the
use of options '-ffast-math' or '-fno-honor-nans'. If such option is
specified, 'fcmp uno' may be optimized to 'false'. It is valid
optimization in general, but it results in 'isnan' always returning
'false'. For example, in some libc++ implementations the following code
returns 'false':
std::isnan(std::numeric_limits<float>::quiet_NaN())
The options '-ffast-math' and '-fno-honor-nans' imply that FP operation
operands are never NaNs. This assumption however should not be applied
to the functions that check FP number properties, including 'isnan'. If
such function returns expected result instead of actually making
checks, it becomes useless in many cases. The option '-ffast-math' is
often used for performance critical code, as it can speed up execution
by the expense of manual treatment of corner cases. If 'isnan' returns
assumed result, a user cannot use it in the manual treatment of NaNs
and has to invent replacements, like making the check using integer
operations. There is a discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D18513#387418,
which also expresses the opinion, that limitations imposed by
'-ffast-math' should be applied only to 'math' functions but not to
'tests'.
To overcome these drawbacks, this change introduces a new IR intrinsic
function 'llvm.isnan', which realizes the check as specified by IEEE-754
and C standards in target-agnostic way. During IR transformations it
does not undergo undesirable optimizations. It reaches instruction
selection, where is lowered in target-dependent way. The lowering can
vary depending on options like '-ffast-math' or '-ffp-model' so the
resulting code satisfies requested semantics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104854
When clamping the index for a memory access to a stacked vector we must
take into account the entire type being accessed, not just assume that
we are accessing only a single element.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105016
This can be seen as a follow up to commit 0ee439b705,
that changed the second argument of __powidf2, __powisf2 and
__powitf2 in compiler-rt from si_int to int. That was to align with
how those runtimes are defined in libgcc.
One thing that seem to have been missing in that patch was to make
sure that the rest of LLVM also handle that the argument now depends
on the size of int (not using the si_int machine mode for 32-bit).
When using __builtin_powi for a target with 16-bit int clang crashed.
And when emitting libcalls to those rtlib functions, typically when
lowering @llvm.powi), the backend would always prepare the exponent
argument as an i32 which caused miscompiles when the rtlib was
compiled with 16-bit int.
The solution used here is to use an overloaded type for the second
argument in @llvm.powi. This way clang can use the "correct" type
when lowering __builtin_powi, and then later when emitting the libcall
it is assumed that the type used in @llvm.powi matches the rtlib
function.
One thing that needed some extra attention was that when vectorizing
calls several passes did not support that several arguments could
be overloaded in the intrinsics. This patch allows overload of a
scalar operand by adding hasVectorInstrinsicOverloadedScalarOpd, with
an entry for powi.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99439
Use RuntimeLibcalls to get a common way to pick correct RTLIB::POWI_*
libcall for a given value type.
This includes a small refactoring of ExpandFPLibCall and
ExpandArgFPLibCall in SelectionDAGLegalize to share a bit of code,
plus adding an ExpandFPLibCall version that can be called directly
when expanding FPOWI/STRICT_FPOWI to ensure that we actually use
the same RTLIB::Libcall when expanding the libcall as we used when
checking the legality of such a call by doing a getLibcallName check.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103050
If a cmpxchg specifies acquire or seq_cst on failure, make sure we
generate code consistent with that ordering even if the success ordering
is not acquire/seq_cst.
At one point, it was ambiguous whether this sort of construct was valid,
but the C++ standad and LLVM now accept arbitrary combinations of
success/failure orderings.
This doesn't address the corresponding issue in AtomicExpand. (This was
reported as https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33332 .)
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50512.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103284
This is currently performed in SelectionDAGLegalize, here we make it also
happen in LegalizeVectorOps, allowing a target to lower the SETCC condition
codes first in LegalizeVectorOps and then lower to a custom node afterwards,
without having to duplicate all of the SETCC condition legalization in the
target specific lowering.
As a result of this, fixed length floating point SETCC nodes can now be
properly lowered for SVE.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98939
We've messed this up a few times recently on RISCV. Experiments
with these asserts found a couple issues on other targets as well.
They've all been cleaned up now so we can put in these asserts to
catch future issues
I had to waive Glue because ADDC/ADDE/etc legalization replaces
Glue with i32 on at least AArch64. X86 used to do the same before
we switched to ADDCARRY. So I guess that's just how that works.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98979
This patch introduces a new intrinsic @llvm.experimental.vector.splice
that constructs a vector of the same type as the two input vectors,
based on a immediate where the sign of the immediate distinguishes two
variants. A positive immediate specifies an index into the first vector
and a negative immediate specifies the number of trailing elements to
extract from the first vector.
For example:
@llvm.experimental.vector.splice(<A,B,C,D>, <E,F,G,H>, 1) ==> <B, C, D, E> ; index
@llvm.experimental.vector.splice(<A,B,C,D>, <E,F,G,H>, -3) ==> <B, C, D, E> ; trailing element count
These intrinsics support both fixed and scalable vectors, where the
former is lowered to a shufflevector to maintain existing behaviour,
although while marked as experimental the recommended way to express
this operation for fixed-width vectors is to use shufflevector. For
scalable vectors where it is not possible to express a shufflevector
mask for this operation, a new ISD node has been implemented.
This is one of the named shufflevector intrinsics proposed on the
mailing-list in the RFC at [1].
Patch by Paul Walker and Cullen Rhodes.
[1] https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-November/146864.html
Reviewed By: sdesmalen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94708
Implement the promotion rule for SELECT_CC nodes by upcasting all the parameters and downcasting the result.
The AArch64 target makes use of this rule and, since it was not implemented, in some cases the instruction selector would hit an assertion upon encountering the illegal node.
This patch requires D97840, the included test cases hit both problems.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97859
If we're going to end up expanding anyway, we should do it early
so we don't create extra operations to handle the bytes added by
promotion.
Simlilar was done for BSWAP previously.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96681
If we're going to end up expanding anyway, we should do it early
so we don't create extra operations to handle the bytes added by
promotion.
This is helfpul on RISCV where we might have to promote i16 all
the way to i64.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95756
This is a follow-up fix to commit 03c8d6a0c4.
Seems like we now end up with NeedInvert being set in the result
from LegalizeSetCCCondCode more often than in the past, so we
need to handle NeedInvert when expanding BR_CC.
Not sure how to deal with the "Tmp4.getNode()" case properly,
but current assumption is that that code path isn't impacted
by the changes in 03c8d6a0c4 so we can simply move
the old assert into the if-branch and only handle NeedInvert in the
else-branch.
I think that the test case added here, for PowerPC, might have
failed also before commit 03c8d6a0c4. But we started
to hit the assert more often downstream when having merged that
commit.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94762
This 'FIXME' popped up in the development of an out-of-tree backend.
Quick fix, but first llvm upstream patch, therefore I do not have commit rights, so if approved please commit?
- Test is not included as this came up in an out-of-tree backend (if required, please hint on how to test this).
Patch by simveg (Simon)
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93219
If SETO/SETUO aren't legal, they'll be expanded and we'll end up
with 3 comparisons.
SETONE is equivalent to (SETOGT || SETOLT)
so if one of those operations is supported use that expansion. We
don't need both since we can commute the operands to make the other.
SETUEQ can be implemented with !(SETOGT || SETOLT) or (SETULE && SETUGE).
I've only implemented the first because it didn't look like most of the
affected targets had legal SETULE/SETUGE.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck, tlively, nemanjai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94450
This patch adds support for the fptoui.sat and fptosi.sat intrinsics,
which provide basically the same functionality as the existing fptoui
and fptosi instructions, but will saturate (or return 0 for NaN) on
values unrepresentable in the target type, instead of returning
poison. Related mailing list discussion can be found at:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/llvm-dev/cgDFaBmCnDQ/CZAIMj4IBAAJ
The intrinsics have overloaded source and result type and support
vector operands:
i32 @llvm.fptoui.sat.i32.f32(float %f)
i100 @llvm.fptoui.sat.i100.f64(double %f)
<4 x i32> @llvm.fptoui.sat.v4i32.v4f16(half %f)
// etc
On the SelectionDAG layer two new ISD opcodes are added,
FP_TO_UINT_SAT and FP_TO_SINT_SAT. These opcodes have two operands
and one result. The second operand is an integer constant specifying
the scalar saturation width. The idea here is that initially the
second operand and the scalar width of the result type are the same,
but they may change during type legalization. For example:
i19 @llvm.fptsi.sat.i19.f32(float %f)
// builds
i19 fp_to_sint_sat f, 19
// type legalizes (through integer result promotion)
i32 fp_to_sint_sat f, 19
I went for this approach, because saturated conversion does not
compose well. There is no good way of "adjusting" a saturating
conversion to i32 into one to i19 short of saturating twice.
Specifying the saturation width separately allows directly saturating
to the correct width.
There are two baseline expansions for the fp_to_xint_sat opcodes. If
the integer bounds can be exactly represented in the float type and
fminnum/fmaxnum are legal, we can expand to something like:
f = fmaxnum f, FP(MIN)
f = fminnum f, FP(MAX)
i = fptoxi f
i = select f uo f, 0, i # unnecessary if unsigned as 0 = MIN
If the bounds cannot be exactly represented, we expand to something
like this instead:
i = fptoxi f
i = select f ult FP(MIN), MIN, i
i = select f ogt FP(MAX), MAX, i
i = select f uo f, 0, i # unnecessary if unsigned as 0 = MIN
It should be noted that this expansion assumes a non-trapping fptoxi.
Initial tests are for AArch64, x86_64 and ARM. This exercises all of
the scalar and vector legalization. ARM is included to test float
softening.
Original patch by @nikic and @ebevhan (based on D54696).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54749
X86 and AArch64 expand it as libcall inside the target. And PowerPC also
want to expand them as libcall for P8. So, propose an implement in the
legalizer to common the logic and remove the code for X86/AArch64 to
avoid the duplicate code.
Reviewed By: Craig Topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91331
If SETUNE isn't legal, UO can use the NOT of the SETO expansion.
Removes some complex isel patterns. Most of the test changes are
from using XORI instead of SEQZ.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92008
Sometimes people get minimal crash reports after a UBSAN incident. This change
tags each trap with an integer representing the kind of failure encountered,
which can aid in tracking down the root cause of the problem.
This patch implements out of line atomics for LSE deployment
mechanism. Details how it works can be found in llvm/docs/Atomics.rst
Options -moutline-atomics and -mno-outline-atomics to enable and disable it
were added to clang driver. This is clang and llvm part of out-of-line atomics
interface, library part is already supported by libgcc. Compiler-rt
support is provided in separate patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91157
Add Legalization support for VECREDUCE_SEQ_FADD, so that we don't need to depend on ExpandReductionsPass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90247
Some of our conversion algorithms produce -0.0 when converting unsigned i64 to double when the rounding mode is round toward negative. This switches them to other algorithms that don't have this problem. Since it is undefined behavior to change rounding mode with the non-strict nodes, this patch only changes the behavior for strict nodes.
There are still problems with unsigned i32 conversions too which I'll try to fix in another patch.
Fixes part of PR47393
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87115
In certain places in llvm/lib/CodeGen we were relying upon the TypeSize
comparison operators when in fact the code was only ever expecting
either scalar values or fixed width vectors. This patch changes a few
functions that were always expecting to work on scalar or fixed width
types:
1. DAGCombiner::mergeTruncStores - deals with scalar integers only.
2. DAGCombiner::ReduceLoadWidth - not valid for vectors.
3. DAGCombiner::createBuildVecShuffle - should only be used for
fixed width vectors.
4. SelectionDAGLegalize::ExpandFCOPYSIGN and
SelectionDAGLegalize::getSignAsIntValue - only work on scalars.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88562
getNode handling for ISD:SETCC calls FoldSETCC which can canonicalize
FP constants to the RHS. When this happens we should create the node
with the FMF that was requested. By using FlagInserter when can ensure
any calls to getNode/getSetcc during canonicalization will also get the flags.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88063
I have fixed up a number of warnings resulting from TypeSize -> uint64_t
casts and calling getVectorNumElements() on scalable vector types. I
think most of the changes are fairly trivial except for those in
DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitVecRes_MSTORE I've tried to ensure we create
the MachineMemoryOperands in a sensible way for scalable vectors.
I have added a CHECK line to the following test:
CodeGen/AArch64/sve-split-store.ll
that ensures no new warnings are added.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86928
Previously, if a floating-point type was legal, but FNEG wasn't legal,
we would use FSUB. Instead, we should use integer ops, to preserve the
semantics. (Alternatively, there's a compiler-rt call we could use, but
there isn't much reason to use that.)
It turns out we actually are still using this obscure codepath in a few
cases: on some targets, we have "legal" floating-point types that don't
actually support any floating-point operations. In particular, ARM and
AArch64 are using this path.
The implementation for SelectionDAG is pretty simple because we can
reuse the infrastructure from FCOPYSIGN.
See also 9a3dc3e, the corresponding change to type legalization.
Also includes a "bonus" change to STRICT_FSUB legalization, so we can
lower a STRICT_FSUB to a float libcall.
Includes the changes to both LegalizeDAG and GlobalISel so we don't have
inconsistent results in the future.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46792 .
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84287
The versions that take 'unsigned' will be removed in the future.
I tried to use getOriginalAlign instead of getAlign in some
places. getAlign factors in the minimum alignment implied by
the offset in the pointer info. Since we're also passing the
pointer info we can use the original alignment.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87592
Clang emits (and (ctpop X), 1) for __builtin_parity. If ctpop
isn't natively supported by the target, this leads to poor codegen
due to the expansion of ctpop being more complex than what is needed
for parity.
This adds a DAG combine to convert the pattern to ISD::PARITY
before operation legalization. Type legalization is updated
to handled Expanding and Promoting this operation. If after type
legalization, CTPOP is supported for this type, LegalizeDAG will
turn it back into CTPOP+AND. Otherwise LegalizeDAG will emit a
series of shifts and xors followed by an AND with 1.
I've avoided vectors in this patch to avoid more legalization
complexity for this patch.
X86 previously had a custom DAG combiner for this. This is now
moved to Custom lowering for the new opcode. There is a minor
regression in vector-reduce-xor-bool.ll, but a follow up patch
can easily fix that.
Fixes PR47433
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87209
This removes the after the fact FMF handling from D46854 in favor of passing fast math flags to getNode. This should be a superset of D87130.
This required adding a SDNodeFlags to SelectionDAG::getSetCC.
Now we manage to contant fold some stuff undefs during the
initial getNode that we don't do in later DAG combines.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87200
Craig Topper