This moves the registry higher in the LLVM library dependency stack.
Every client of the target registry needs to link against MC anyway to
actually use the target, so we might as well move this out of Support.
This allows us to ensure that Support doesn't have includes from MC/*.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111454
Recognize Bi as an unconditional branch, just like JMP. This allows
machine verification to run after MSP430BranchSelector without failing
this assertion:
virtual bool llvm::MSP430InstrInfo::analyzeBranch(llvm::MachineBasicBlock &, llvm::MachineBasicBlock *&, llvm::MachineBasicBlock *&, SmallVectorImpl<llvm::MachineOperand> &, bool) const: Assertion `I->getOpcode() == MSP430::JCC && "Invalid conditional branch"' failed.
Note that machine verification is currently disabled after
addPreEmitPass passes because of problems on other targets, so this is
currently NFC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110691
The MSP430 ABI supports build attributes for specifying
the ISA, code model, data model and enum size in ELF object files.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107969
Soft deprecrate isNullValue/isAllOnesValue and update in tree
callers. This matches the changes to the APInt interface from
D109483.
Reviewed By: lattner
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109535
On some architectures such as Arm and X86 the encoding for a nop may
change depending on the subtarget in operation at the time of
encoding. This change replaces the per module MCSubtargetInfo retained
by the targets AsmBackend in favour of passing through the local
MCSubtargetInfo in operation at the time.
On Arm using the architectural NOP instruction can have a performance
benefit on some implementations.
For Arm I've deleted the copy of the AsmBackend's MCSubtargetInfo to
limit the chances of this causing problems in the future. I've not
done this for other targets such as X86 as there is more frequent use
of the MCSubtargetInfo and it looks to be for stable properties that
we would not expect to vary per function.
This change required threading STI through MCNopsFragment and
MCBoundaryAlignFragment.
I've attempted to take into account the in tree experimental backends.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45962
This is a mechanical change. This actually also renames the
similarly named methods in the SmallString class, however these
methods don't seem to be used outside of the llvm subproject, so
this doesn't break building of the rest of the monorepo.
This patch factors out the part of printInstruction that gets the
mnemonic string for a given MCInst. This is intended to be used
subsequently for the instruction-mix remarks to display the final
mnemonic (D90040).
Unfortunately making `getMnemonic` available to the AsmPrinter
seems to require making it virtual. Not sure if there's a way around
that with the current layering of the AsmPrinters.
Reviewed By: Paul-C-Anagnostopoulos
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90039
No longer rely on an external tool to build the llvm component layout.
Instead, leverage the existing `add_llvm_componentlibrary` cmake function and
introduce `add_llvm_component_group` to accurately describe component behavior.
These function store extra properties in the created targets. These properties
are processed once all components are defined to resolve library dependencies
and produce the header expected by llvm-config.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90848
Follow up from a similar patch on RISCV 637f19c36b
Nothing reads this Glue value that I could see. The SDNode def in
the td file does not have the SDNPOutGlue flag so I don't think
this glue would get properly propagated to MachineSDNodes if it
was used.
In most of lib/Target we know that we are not dealing with scalable
types so it's perfectly fine to replace TypeSize comparison operators
with their fixed width equivalents, making use of getFixedSize()
and so on.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89101
This patch implements initial backend support for a -mtune CPU controlled by a "tune-cpu" function attribute. If the attribute is not present X86 will use the resolved CPU from target-cpu attribute or command line.
This patch adds MC layer support a tune CPU. Each CPU now has two sets of features stored in their GenSubtargetInfo.inc tables . These features lists are passed separately to the Processor and ProcessorModel classes in tablegen. The tune list defaults to an empty list to avoid changes to non-X86. This annoyingly increases the size of static tables on all target as we now store 24 more bytes per CPU. I haven't quantified the overall impact, but I can if we're concerned.
One new test is added to X86 to show a few tuning features with mismatched tune-cpu and target-cpu/target-feature attributes to demonstrate independent control. Another new test is added to demonstrate that the scheduler model follows the tune CPU.
I have not added a -mtune to llc/opt or MC layer command line yet. With no attributes we'll just use the -mcpu for both. MC layer tools will always follow the normal CPU for tuning.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85165
This fixes warnings raised by Clang's new -Wsuggest-override, in preparation for enabling that warning in the LLVM build. This patch also removes the virtual keyword where redundant, but only in places where doing so improves consistency within a given file. It also removes a couple unnecessary virtual destructor declarations in derived classes where the destructor inherited from the base class is already virtual.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83709
For TI's distribution of msp430-gcc
```
msp430-elf-gcc -S -o- -Os -x c - <<< "int f(float a, float b) { return a != b; }"
```
does not mention `R13` at all. `__libgcc_cmp_return__` machine mode is 2 byte on MSP430, as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82635
When writing a unit test on replacing standard epilogue sequences with `BR __mspabi_func_epilog_<N>`, by manually asm-clobbering `rN` - `r10` for N = 4..10, everything worked well except for seeming inability to clobber r4.
The problem was that MSP430 code generator of LLVM used an obsolete name FP for that register. Things were worse because when `llc` read an unknown register name, it silently ignored it.
That is, I cannot use `fp` register name from the C code because Clang does not accept it (exactly like GCC). But the accepted name `r4` is not recognised by `llc` (it can be used in listings passed to `llvm-mc` and even `fp` is replace to `r4` by `llvm-mc`). So I can specify any of `fp` or `r4` for the string literal of `asm(...)` but nothing in the clobber list.
This patch replaces `MSP430::FP` with `MSP430::R4` in the backend code (even [MSP430 EABI](http://www.ti.com/lit/an/slaa534/slaa534.pdf) doesn't mention FP as a register name). The R0 - R3 registers, on the other hand, are left as is in the backend code (after all, they have some special meaning on the ISA level). It is just ensured clang is renaming them as expected by the downstream tools. There is probably not much sense in **marking them clobbered** but rename them //just in case// for use at potentially different contexts.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82184
When writing a unit test on replacing standard epilogue sequences with `BR __mspabi_func_epilog_<N>`, by manually asm-clobbering `rN` - `r10` for N = 4..10, everything worked well except for seeming inability to clobber r4.
The problem was that MSP430 code generator of LLVM used an obsolete name FP for that register. Things were worse because when `llc` read an unknown register name, it silently ignored it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82184
This commit technically permits LLVM to emit the debug information for ELF files for MSP430 architecture. Aside from this, it only defines the register numbers as defined by part 10.1 of MSP430 EABI specification (assuming the 1-byte subregisters share the register numbers with corresponding full-size registers).
This commit was basically tested by me with TI-provided GCC 8.3.1 toolchain by compiling an example program with `clang` (please note manual linking may be required due to upstream `clang` not yet handling the `-msim` option necessary to run binaries on the GDB-provided simulator) and then running it and single-stepping with `msp430-elf-gdb` like this:
```
$sysroot/bin/msp430-elf-gdb ./test -ex "target sim" -ex "load ./test"
(gdb) ... traditional GDB commands follow ...
```
While this implementation is most probably far from completeness and is considered experimental, it can already help with debugging MSP430 programs as well as finding issues in LLVM debug info support for MSP430 itself.
One of the use cases includes trying to find a point where UBSan check in a trap-on-error mode was triggered.
The expected debug information format is described in the [MSP430 Embedded Application Binary Interface](http://www.ti.com/lit/an/slaa534/slaa534.pdf) specification, part 10.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81488
Summary: Note to downstream target maintainers: this might silently change the semantics of your code if you override `TargetLowering::HandleByVal` without marking it `override`.
This patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: sdardis, hiraditya, jrtc27, atanasyan, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81365
This patch stores the alignment for ConstantPoolSDNode as an
Align and updates the getConstantPool interface to take a MaybeAlign.
Removing getAlignment() will be done as a follow up.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79436
Summary:
They all match the base implementation in
TargetInstrInfo::isUnpredicatedTerminator.
Follow up to D62749.
Reviewers: echristo, MaskRay, hfinkel
Reviewed By: echristo
Subscribers: wuzish, nemanjai, hiraditya, kbarton, llvm-commits, srhines
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78976
Summary:
Before this patch, `relaxInstruction` takes three arguments, the first
argument refers to the instruction before relaxation and the third
argument is the output instruction after relaxation. There are two quite
strange things:
1) The first argument's type is `const MCInst &`, the third
argument's type is `MCInst &`, but they may be aliased to the same
variable
2) The backends of ARM, AMDGPU, RISC-V, Hexagon assume that the third
argument is a fresh uninitialized `MCInst` even if `relaxInstruction`
may be called like `relaxInstruction(Relaxed, STI, Relaxed)` in a
loop.
In this patch, we drop the thrid argument, and let `relaxInstruction`
directly modify the given instruction. Also, this patch fixes the bug https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45580, which is introduced by D77851, and
breaks the assumption of ARM, AMDGPU, RISC-V, Hexagon.
Reviewers: Razer6, MaskRay, jyknight, asb, luismarques, enderby, rtaylor, colinl, bcain
Reviewed By: Razer6, MaskRay, bcain
Subscribers: bcain, nickdesaulniers, nathanchance, wuzish, annita.zhang, arsenm, dschuff, jyknight, dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, tpr, sbc100, jgravelle-google, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, Jim, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78364
Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: jyknight, sdardis, nemanjai, hiraditya, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, jfb, PkmX, jocewei, Jim, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77059
Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, hiraditya, kbarton, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, Jim, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76551
Summary:
Add a new method (tryParseRegister) that attempts to parse a register specification.
MASM allows the use of IFDEF <register>, as well as IFDEF <symbol>. To accommodate this, we make it possible to check whether a register specification can be parsed at the current location, without failing the entire parse if it can't.
Reviewers: thakis
Reviewed By: thakis
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73486
Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: arsenm, dschuff, jyknight, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Jim, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73885
Jay Foad