If we know the source operand of COPY is defined by a vector instruction
with tail agnostic and the same LMUL and there is no vsetvli between
COPY and the define instruction to change the vl and vtype, we could use
vmv.v.v or vmv.v.i to copy vector registers to get better performance than
the whole vector register move instructions.
If the source of COPY is from vmv.v.i, we could use vmv.v.i for the
COPY.
This patch only considers all these instructions within one basic block.
Case 1:
```
bb.0:
...
VSETVLI # The first VSETVLI before COPY and VOP.
... # Use this VSETVLI to check LMUL and tail agnostic.
...
vy = VOP va, vb # Define vy.
... # There is no vsetvli between VOP and COPY.
vx = COPY vy
```
Case 2:
```
bb.0:
...
VSETVLI # The first VSETVLI before VOP.
... # Use this VSETVLI to check LMUL and tail agnostic.
...
vy = VOP va, vb # Define vy.
... # There is no vsetvli to change vl between VOP and COPY.
...
VSETVLI # The first VSETVLI before COPY.
... # This VSETVLI does not change vl and vtype.
...
vx = COPY vy
```
Co-Authored-by: Zakk Chen <zakk.chen@sifive.com>
Co-Authored-by: Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@sifive.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103510
- When an unconditional branch is expanded into an indirect branch, if
there is no scavenged register, an SGPR pair needs spilling to enable
the destination PC calculation. In addition, before jumping into the
destination, that clobbered SGPR pair need restoring.
- As SGPR cannot be spilled to or restored from memory directly, the
spilling/restoring of that SGPR pair reuses the regular SGPR spilling
support but without spilling it into memory. As that spilling and
restoring points are fully controlled, we only need to spill that SGPR
into the temporary VGPR, which needs spilling into its emergency slot.
- The target-specific hook is revised to take additional restore block,
where the restoring code is filled. After that, the relaxation will
place that restore block directly before the destination block and
insert an unconditional branch in any fall-through block into the
destination block.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106449
This function was copied from ARM where register pairs/triples/quads can wrap around the 32 encoding space. So register 31 can pair with register 0. This is not true for RISCV vectors. The spec specifically mentions the possibility of a future encoding that has more than 32 registers.
This patch removes the modulo from the code and directly checks that destination register is in the source register range and not the beginning of the range. Though I don't expect an identity copy will occur.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111467
Use SH1ADD/SH2ADD/SH3ADD along with LUI+ADDI to compose int32*3,
int32*5 and int32*9.
Reviewed By: craig.topper, luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111484
This moves the registry higher in the LLVM library dependency stack.
Every client of the target registry needs to link against MC anyway to
actually use the target, so we might as well move this out of Support.
This allows us to ensure that Support doesn't have includes from MC/*.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111454
This reverts commit 1f16191906.
We're seeing some issues with this internally. It seems that when
the spill is created by register allocation, the GPR doesn't get
allocated and an assertion fires during virtual register rewriting.
The .mir test case contains the spill before register allocation so
register allocation sees it as any other instruction.
This simplifies the API and addresses a FIXME in
TwoAddressInstructionPass::convertInstTo3Addr.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110229
Don't outline machine instructions which are using jump table indexes
since they are materialized as local labels (like the already handled
case of constant pools).
Reviewed By: paquette
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109436
The expansion of these pseudos creates ADD instructions. Those
ADDs modify a GPR so that it is no longer contains the same value
as the input base pointer. Therefore, I believe we should have a
GPR as a Def on these instructions and expansion should get the
destination register for the ADDs from that operand.
At least in our tests here this works out so that register
scavenging picks the same register as the base pointer.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109405
This patch fixes an issue where RISCV's `findCommutedOpIndices` would
incorrectly return the pseudo `CommuteAnyOperandIndex` as a commutable
operand index, rather than fixing a specific index.
Reviewed By: rogfer01
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108206
Previously we converted ISD condition codes to integers and stored
them directly in our MIR instructions. The ISD enum kind of belongs
to SelectionDAG so that seems like incorrect layering.
This patch instead uses a CondCode node on RISCV::SELECT_CC until
isel and then converts it from ISD encoding to a RISCV specific value.
This value can be converted to/from the RISCV branch opcodes in the
RISCV namespace.
My larger motivation is to possibly support a microarchitectural
feature of some CPUs where a short forward branch over a single
instruction can be predicated internally. This will require a new
pseudo instruction for select that needs to carry a branch condition
and live probably until RISCVExpandPseudos. At that point it can be
expanded to control flow without other instructions ending up in the
predicated basic block. Using an ISD encoding in RISCVExpandPseudos
doesn't seem like correct layering.
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107400
Use a tail policy operand instead. Inspired by the work in D105092,
but without the intrinsic interface changes.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106512
If the upper 32 bits are zero and bit 31 is set, we might be able to
use zext.w to fill in the zeros after using an lui and/or addi.
Most of this patch is plumbing the subtarget features into the constant
materialization.
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105509
This patch teaches the compiler to generate code to handle larger RVV
stack sizes and stack offsets which resolve an amount larger than 2047
vector registers in size.
The previous behaviour was asserting on such large values as it was only
able to materialize the constant by feeding it to the 12-bit immediate
of an `ADDI` instruction. The compiler can now materialize this amount
into a temporary register before continuing with the computation.
A test case for this scenario is included which also checks that the
temporary register used to materialize the amount doesn't require an
additional spill slot over what we're already reserving for RVV code.
Reviewed By: rogfer01
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104727
The first source has the same EEW as the destination, but we're
using earlyclobber which prevents them from ever being the same
register. This patch attempts to work around this.
-For unmasked .wv, add a special TIED pseudo that pretends like
the first operand and the destination must be the same register. This
disables the earlyclobber for that source. Mark the instruction
as convertible to 3 address form which will switch it to the
original untied pseudo when the TwoAddressInstructionPass decides
that keeping them tied would require an extra copy. This uses
code in RISCVInstrInfo.cpp to do the conversion to the untied
opcode.
The untie test case show that we can generate the untied version.
Not sure it was profitable to do it in this case, but they have
really simple IR.
Reviewed By: arcbbb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103552
This patch addresses an issue in which fixed-length (VLS) vector RVV
code could fail to reserve an emergency spill slot for their frame index
elimination. This is because we were previously only reserving a spill
slot when there were `scalable-vector` frame indices being used.
However, fixed-length codegen uses regular-type frame indices if it
needs to spill.
This patch does the fairly brute-force method of checking ahead of time
whether the function contains any RVV spill instructions, in which case
it reserves one slot. Note that the second RVV slot is still only
reserved for `scalable-vector` frame indices.
This unfortunately causes quite a bit of churn in existing tests, where
we chop and change stack offsets for spill slots.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103269
If the local variable `NumOfVReg` isPowerOf2_32(NumOfVReg - 1) or isPowerOf2_32(NumOfVReg + 1), the ADDI and MUL instructions can be replaced with SLLI and ADD(or SUB) instructions.
Based on original patch by StephenFan.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck, StephenFan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100577
The MachineBasicBlock::iterator is continuously changing during
generating the frame handling instructions. We should use the DebugLoc
from the caller, instead of getting it from the changing iterator.
If the prologue instructions located in a basic block without any other
instructions after these prologue instructions, the iterator will be
updated to the boundary of the basic block and it is invalid to use the
iterator to access DebugLoc. This patch also fixes the crash when
accessing DebugLoc using the iterator.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102386
This patch adds an additional emergency spill slot to RVV code. This is
required as RVV stack offsets may require an additional register to compute.
This patch includes an optimization by @HsiangKai <kai.wang@sifive.com>
to reduce the number of registers required for the computation of stack
offsets from 3 to 2. Otherwise we'd need two additional emergency spill
slots.
Reviewed By: HsiangKai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100574
It's necessary to calculate correct instruction size because
PseudoVRELOAD and PseudoSPILL will be expanded into multiple
instructions.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100702
This adds a new integer materialization strategy mainly targeted
at 64-bit constants like 0xffffffff where there are 32 or more trailing
ones with leading zeros. We can materialize these by using an addi -1
and srli to restore the leading zeros. This matches what gcc does.
I haven't limited to just these cases though. The implementation
here takes the constant, shifts out all the leading zeros and
shifts ones into the LSBs, creates the new sequence, adds an srli,
and checks if this is shorter than our original strategy.
I've separated the recursive portion into a standalone function
so I could append the new strategy outside of the recursion. Since
external users are no longer using the recursive function, I've
cleaned up the external interface to return the sequence instead of
taking a vector by reference.
Reviewed By: asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98821
For Zvlsseg, we create several tuple register classes. When spilling for
these tuple register classes, we need to iterate NF times to load/store
these tuple registers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98629
As far as I know we're not enforcing the StdExtM must be enabled
to use the V extension. If we use an assert here and hit this
code in a release build we'll silently emit an invalid instruction.
By using a diagnostic we report the error to the user in release
builds. I think there may still be a later fatal error from
the code emitter though.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97970
This patch proposes how to deal with RISC-V vector frame objects. The
layout of RISC-V vector frame will look like
|---------------------------------|
| scalar callee-saved registers |
|---------------------------------|
| scalar local variables |
|---------------------------------|
| scalar outgoing arguments |
|---------------------------------|
| RVV local variables && |
| RVV outgoing arguments |
|---------------------------------| <- end of frame (sp)
If there is realignment or variable length array in the stack, we will use
frame pointer to access fixed objects and stack pointer to access
non-fixed objects.
|---------------------------------| <- frame pointer (fp)
| scalar callee-saved registers |
|---------------------------------|
| scalar local variables |
|---------------------------------|
| ///// realignment ///// |
|---------------------------------|
| scalar outgoing arguments |
|---------------------------------|
| RVV local variables && |
| RVV outgoing arguments |
|---------------------------------| <- end of frame (sp)
If there are both realignment and variable length array in the stack, we
will use frame pointer to access fixed objects and base pointer to access
non-fixed objects.
|---------------------------------| <- frame pointer (fp)
| scalar callee-saved registers |
|---------------------------------|
| scalar local variables |
|---------------------------------|
| ///// realignment ///// |
|---------------------------------| <- base pointer (bp)
| RVV local variables && |
| RVV outgoing arguments |
|---------------------------------|
| /////////////////////////////// |
| variable length array |
| /////////////////////////////// |
|---------------------------------| <- end of frame (sp)
| scalar outgoing arguments |
|---------------------------------|
In this version, we do not save the addresses of RVV objects in the
stack. We access them directly through the polynomial expression
(a x VLENB + b). We do not reserve frame pointer when there is any RVV
object in the stack. So, we also access the scalar frame objects through the
polynomial expression (a x VLENB + b) if the access across RVV stack
area.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94465
This adds support for commuting operands and converting between
vfmadd and vfmacc to avoid register copies.
To avoid messing up intrinsic behavior, I've added new pseudo
instructions that have the isCommutable flag set. These pseudos also
force a tail agnostic policy. The intrinsic version still use
the tail undisturbed policy.
For best results it looks like we need to start with fmadd and only
pick fmacc if its beneficial. MachineCSE commutes without contraining
the operands and then commutes back if it didn't help with CSE. So
I've made sure that when the operand choice isn't constrained, we
will keep fmadd for MachineCSE and when it does the second commute,
we get back the original instruction.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95800
RISCVBaseInfo.h belongs to the MC layer, but the Pseudo instructions
are only used by the CodeGen layer. So it makes sense to keep this
table in the CodeGen layer.
MCTargetDesc includes headers from Utils and Utils includes headers
from MCTargetDesc. So from a library layering perspective it makes sense
for them to be in the same library. I guess the other option might be to
move the tablegen includes from RISCVMCTargetDesc.h to RISCVBaseInfo.h
so that RISCVBaseInfo.h didn't need to include RISCVMCTargetDesc.h.
Everything else that depends on Utils also depends on MCTargetDesc so
having one library seemed simpler.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93168
This makes the llvm-objdump output much more readable and closer to binutils objdump. This builds on D76591
It requires changing the OperandType for certain immediates to "OPERAND_PCREL" so tablegen will generate code to pass the instruction's address. This means we can't do the generic check on these instructions in verifyInstruction any more. Should I add it back with explicit opcode checks? Or should we add a new operand flag to control the passing of address instead of matching the name?
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92147
ADDI often has a frameindex in operand 1, but consumers of this
interface, such as MachineSink, tend to call getReg() on the Destination
and Source operands, leading to the following crash when building
FreeBSD after this implementation was added in 8cf6778d30:
```
clang: llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineOperand.h:359: llvm::Register llvm::MachineOperand::getReg() const: Assertion `isReg() && "This is not a register operand!"' failed.
PLEASE submit a bug report to https://bugs.llvm.org/ and include the crash backtrace, preprocessed source, and associated run script.
Stack dump:
#0 0x00007f4286f9b4d0 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:563:0
#1 0x00007f4286f9b587 PrintStackTraceSignalHandler(void*) llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:630:0
#2 0x00007f4286f9926b llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:71:0
#3 0x00007f4286f9ae52 SignalHandler(int) llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:405:0
#4 0x00007f428646ffd0 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x3efd0)
#5 0x00007f428646ff47 raise /build/glibc-2ORdQG/glibc-2.27/signal/../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:51:0
#6 0x00007f42864718b1 abort /build/glibc-2ORdQG/glibc-2.27/stdlib/abort.c:81:0
#7 0x00007f428646142a __assert_fail_base /build/glibc-2ORdQG/glibc-2.27/assert/assert.c:89:0
#8 0x00007f42864614a2 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x304a2)
#9 0x00007f428d4078e2 llvm::MachineOperand::getReg() const llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineOperand.h:359:0
#10 0x00007f428d8260e7 attemptDebugCopyProp(llvm::MachineInstr&, llvm::MachineInstr&) llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineSink.cpp:862:0
#11 0x00007f428d826442 performSink(llvm::MachineInstr&, llvm::MachineBasicBlock&, llvm::MachineInstrBundleIterator<llvm::MachineInstr, false>, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::MachineInstr*>&) llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineSink.cpp:918:0
#12 0x00007f428d826e27 (anonymous namespace)::MachineSinking::SinkInstruction(llvm::MachineInstr&, bool&, std::map<llvm::MachineBasicBlock*, llvm::SmallVector<llvm::MachineBasicBlock*, 4u>, std::less<llvm::MachineBasicBlock*>, std::allocator<std::pair<llvm::MachineBasicBlock* const, llvm::SmallVector<llvm::MachineBasicBlock*, 4u> > > >&) llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineSink.cpp:1073:0
#13 0x00007f428d824a2c (anonymous namespace)::MachineSinking::ProcessBlock(llvm::MachineBasicBlock&) llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineSink.cpp:410:0
#14 0x00007f428d824513 (anonymous namespace)::MachineSinking::runOnMachineFunction(llvm::MachineFunction&) llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineSink.cpp:340:0
```
Thus, check that operand 1 is also a register in the condition.
Reviewed By: arichardson, luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89090
This does not result in changes for any of the current tests, but it might
improve debug information in some cases.
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86522
Since the canonical floatig-point move is fsgnj rd, rs, rs, we should
handle this case in RISCVInstrInfo::isAsCheapAsAMove().
Reviewed By: lenary
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86518
The isTriviallyRematerializable hook is only called for instructions that are
tagged as isAsCheapAsAMove. Since ADDI 0 is used for "mv" it should definitely
be marked with "isAsCheapAsAMove". This change avoids one stack spill in most of
the atomic-rmw.ll tests functions. It also avoids stack spills in two of our
out-of-tree CHERI tests.
ORI/XORI with zero may or may not be the same as a move micro-architecturally,
but since we are already doing it for register == x0, we might as well
do the same if the immediate is zero.
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86480
This fixes the "Unable to insert indirect branch" fatal error sometimes
seen when generating position-independent code.
Patch by msizanoen1
Reviewed By: jrtc27
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84833
Summary:
Without these, the generic branch relaxation pass will underestimate the
range required for branches spanning these and we can end up with
"fixup value out of range" errors rather than relaxing the branches.
Some of the instructions in the expansion may end up being compressed
but exactly determining that is awkward, and these conservative values
should be safe, if slightly suboptimal in rare cases.
Reviewers: asb, lenary, luismarques, lewis-revill
Reviewed By: asb, luismarques
Subscribers: hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, jfb, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, evandro, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77443
Because of the layout of stores (that don't have a destination operand)
this check is exactly the same as the one in
RISCVInstrInfo::isLoadFromStackSlot.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81805
Preserving liveness can be useful even late in the pipeline, if we're
doing substantial optimization work afterwards. (See, for example,
D76065.) Teach MachineOutliner how to correctly set live-ins on the
basic block in outlined functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78605
Summary:
Implements the jump pseudo-instruction, which is used in e.g. the Linux kernel.
Reviewers: asb, lenary
Reviewed By: lenary
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73178
These names have been changed from CamelCase to camelCase, but there were
many places (comments mostly) that still used the old names.
This change is NFC.
Hsiangkai Wang