It breaks up the function pass manager in the codegen pipeline.
With empty parameters, it looks at the -mllvm flag -rewrite-map-file.
This is likely not in use.
Add a check that we only have one function pass manager in the codegen
pipeline.
Some tests relied on the fact that we had a module pass somewhere in the
codegen pipeline.
addr-label.ll crashes on ARM due to this change. This is because a
ARMConstantPoolConstant containing a BasicBlock to represent a
blockaddress may hold an invalid pointer to a BasicBlock if the
blockaddress is invalidated by its BasicBlock getting removed. In that
case all referencing blockaddresses are RAUW a constant int. Making
ARMConstantPoolConstant::CVal a WeakVH fixes the crash, but I'm not sure
that's the right fix. As a workaround, create a barrier right before
ISel so that IR optimizations can't happen while a
ARMConstantPoolConstant has been created.
Reviewed By: rnk, MaskRay, compnerd
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99707
It breaks up the function pass manager in the codegen pipeline.
With empty parameters, it looks at the -mllvm flag -rewrite-map-file.
This is likely not in use.
Add a check that we only have one function pass manager in the codegen
pipeline.
This required reverting commit 9583a3f2625818b78c0cf6d473cdedb9f23ad82c:
"[AsmPrinter] Delete dead takeDeletedSymbsForFunction()".
This was not NFC as initially thought. By coalescing two function
psas managers, this exposed the reverted code as necessary.
addr-label.ll was crashing due to an emitted blockaddress's block being
removed but the label not emitted.
Some tests relied on the fact that we had a module pass somewhere in the
codegen pipeline.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99707
to LLVM IR changes with addr label weirdness. In the testcase, we
generate references to the two bb's when codegen'ing the first
function:
_test1: ## @test1
leaq Ltmp0(%rip), %rax
..
leaq Ltmp1(%rip), %rax
Then continue to codegen the second function where the blocks
get merged. We're now smart enough to emit both labels, producing
this code:
_test_fun: ## @test_fun
## BB#0: ## %entry
Ltmp1: ## Block address taken
Ltmp0:
## BB#1: ## %ret
movl $-1, %eax
ret
Rejoice.
llvm-svn: 98595
label is generated, but then the block is deleted. Since the
value is undefined, we just emit the label right after the entry
label of the function. It might matter that the label is in the
same section as the function was afterall.
llvm-svn: 98579
Arthur Eubanks