Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Roman Lebedev 42712698fd
Revert "[IR] `IRBuilderBase::CreateAdd()`: short-circuit `x + 0` --> `x`"
Clang OpenMP codegen tests are failing.

This reverts commit 288f1f8abe.
This reverts commit cb90e5356a.
2021-10-27 22:21:37 +03:00
Roman Lebedev cb90e5356a
[IR] `IRBuilderBase::CreateAdd()`: short-circuit `x + 0` --> `x`
There's precedent for that in `CreateOr()`/`CreateAnd()`.

The motivation here is to avoid bloating the run-time check's IR
in `SCEVExpander::generateOverflowCheck()`.

Refs. https://reviews.llvm.org/D109368#3089809
2021-10-27 21:34:38 +03:00
David Sherwood 26b7d9d622 [LoopVectorize] Permit vectorisation of more select(cmp(), X, Y) reduction patterns
This patch adds further support for vectorisation of loops that involve
selecting an integer value based on a previous comparison. Consider the
following C++ loop:

  int r = a;
  for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
    if (src[i] > 3) {
      r = b;
    }
    src[i] += 2;
  }

We should be able to vectorise this loop because all we are doing is
selecting between two states - 'a' and 'b' - both of which are loop
invariant. This just involves building a vector of values that contain
either 'a' or 'b', where the final reduced value will be 'b' if any lane
contains 'b'.

The IR generated by clang typically looks like this:

  %phi = phi i32 [ %a, %entry ], [ %phi.update, %for.body ]
  ...
  %pred = icmp ugt i32 %val, i32 3
  %phi.update = select i1 %pred, i32 %b, i32 %phi

We already detect min/max patterns, which also involve a select + cmp.
However, with the min/max patterns we are selecting loaded values (and
hence loop variant) in the loop. In addition we only support certain
cmp predicates. This patch adds a new pattern matching function
(isSelectCmpPattern) and new RecurKind enums - SelectICmp & SelectFCmp.
We only support selecting values that are integer and loop invariant,
however we can support any kind of compare - integer or float.

Tests have been added here:

  Transforms/LoopVectorize/AArch64/sve-select-cmp.ll
  Transforms/LoopVectorize/select-cmp-predicated.ll
  Transforms/LoopVectorize/select-cmp.ll

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108136
2021-10-11 09:41:38 +01:00
Krasimir Georgiev 685f1bfd0a Revert "[LoopVectorize] Permit vectorisation of more select(cmp(), X, Y) reduction patterns"
It appears to cause stage2 clang build failures, e.g.,
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/74/builds/7145.

This reverts commit 1fb37334bd.
2021-10-01 11:39:43 +02:00
David Sherwood 1fb37334bd [LoopVectorize] Permit vectorisation of more select(cmp(), X, Y) reduction patterns
This patch adds further support for vectorisation of loops that involve
selecting an integer value based on a previous comparison. Consider the
following C++ loop:

  int r = a;
  for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
    if (src[i] > 3) {
      r = b;
    }
    src[i] += 2;
  }

We should be able to vectorise this loop because all we are doing is
selecting between two states - 'a' and 'b' - both of which are loop
invariant. This just involves building a vector of values that contain
either 'a' or 'b', where the final reduced value will be 'b' if any lane
contains 'b'.

The IR generated by clang typically looks like this:

  %phi = phi i32 [ %a, %entry ], [ %phi.update, %for.body ]
  ...
  %pred = icmp ugt i32 %val, i32 3
  %phi.update = select i1 %pred, i32 %b, i32 %phi

We already detect min/max patterns, which also involve a select + cmp.
However, with the min/max patterns we are selecting loaded values (and
hence loop variant) in the loop. In addition we only support certain
cmp predicates. This patch adds a new pattern matching function
(isSelectCmpPattern) and new RecurKind enums - SelectICmp & SelectFCmp.
We only support selecting values that are integer and loop invariant,
however we can support any kind of compare - integer or float.

Tests have been added here:

  Transforms/LoopVectorize/AArch64/sve-select-cmp.ll
  Transforms/LoopVectorize/select-cmp-predicated.ll
  Transforms/LoopVectorize/select-cmp.ll

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108136
2021-10-01 08:41:03 +01:00