For some optimizations on comparisons it's necessary that the
union/intersect is exact and not a superset. Add methods that
return Optional<ConstantRange> only if the result is exact.
For the sake of simplicity this is implemented by comparing
the subset and superset approximations for now, but it should be
possible to do this more directly, as unionWith() and intersectWith()
already distinguish the cases where the result is imprecise for the
preferred range type functionality.
Fix a dangling else that gcc-11 warned about. The EXPECT_EQ macro
expands to an if-else, so the whole construction contains a hidden
dangling else.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113346
Add a variant of getEquivalentICmp() that produces an optional
offset. This allows us to create an equivalent icmp for all ranges.
Use this in the with.overflow folding code, which was doing this
adjustment separately -- this clarifies that the fold will indeed
always apply.
When we have an actual shuffle, we can impose the additional restriction
that the mask replicates the elements of the first operand, so we know
the replication factor as a ratio of output and op0 vector sizes.
These tests have pretty high O() complexity due to their nature,
which leads to potentially-long runtimes.
While in release build for me they took ~1 and ~2 sec,
as noted in https://reviews.llvm.org/D113214#inline-1080479
they take minutes in debug build.
Fine-tune the amount of permutations they deal with,
without affecting the test coverage. After this,
they take <~10ms each for me (in release build),
hopefully that is good-enough for debug build too.
Avid readers of this saga may recall from previous installments,
that replication mask replicates (lol) each of the `VF` elements
in a vector `ReplicationFactor` times. For example, the mask for
`ReplicationFactor=3` and `VF=4` is: `<0,0,0,1,1,1,2,2,2,3,3,3>`.
More importantly, replication mask is used by LoopVectorizer
when using masked interleaved memory operations.
As discussed in previous installments, while it is used by LV,
and we **seem** to support masked interleaved memory operations on X86,
it's support in cost model leaves a lot to be desired:
until basically yesterday even for AVX512 we had no cost model for it.
As it has been witnessed in the recent
AVX2 `X86TTIImpl::getInterleavedMemoryOpCost()`
costmodel patches, while it is hard-enough to query the cost
of a particular assembly sequence [from llvm-mca],
afterwards the check lines LV costmodel tests must be updated manually.
This is, at the very least, boring.
Okay, now we have decent costmodel coverage for interleaving shuffles,
but now basically the same mind-killing sequence has to be performed
for replication mask. I think we can improve at least the second half
of the problem, by teaching
the `TargetTransformInfoImplCRTPBase::getUserCost()` to recognize
`Instruction::ShuffleVector` that are repetition masks,
adding exhaustive test coverage
using `-cost-model -analyze` + `utils/update_analyze_test_checks.py`
This way we can have good exhaustive coverage for cost model,
and only basic coverage for the LV costmodel.
This patch adds precise undef-aware `isReplicationMask()`,
with exhaustive test coverage.
* `InstructionsTest.ShuffleMaskIsReplicationMask` shows that
it correctly detects all the known masks.
* `InstructionsTest.ShuffleMaskIsReplicationMask_undef`
shows that replacing some mask elements in a known replication mask
still allows us to recognize it as a replication mask.
Note, with enough undef elts, we may detect a different tuple.
* `InstructionsTest.ShuffleMaskIsReplicationMask_Exhaustive_Correctness`
shows that if we detected the replication mask with given params,
then if we actually generate a true replication mask with said params,
it matches element-wise ignoring undef mask elements.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113214
By default `llvm::seq` would happily iterate over enums, which may be unsafe if the enum values are not continuous. This patch disable enum iteration with `llvm::seq` and `llvm::seq_inclusive` and adds two new functions: `enum_seq` and `enum_seq_inclusive`.
To make sure enum iteration is safe, we require users to declare their enum types as iterable by specializing `enum_iteration_traits<SomeEnum>`. Because it's not always possible to add these traits next to enum definition (e.g., for enums defined in external libraries), we provide an escape hatch to allow iteration on per-callsite basis by passing `force_iteration_on_noniterable_enum`.
The main benefit of this approach is that these global declarations via traits can appear just next to enum definitions, making easy to spot when enums are miss-labeled, e.g., after introducing new enum values, whereas `force_iteration_on_noniterable_enum` should stand out and be easy to grep for.
This emerged from a discussion with gchatelet@ about reusing llvm's `Sequence.h` in lieu of https://github.com/GPUOpen-Drivers/llpc/blob/dev/lgc/interface/lgc/EnumIterator.h.
Reviewed By: dblaikie, gchatelet, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107378
For certain combination of LHS and RHS constant ranges,
the signedness of the relational comparison predicate is irrelevant.
This implements complete and precise model for all predicates,
as confirmed by the brute-force tests. I'm not sure if there are
some more cases that we can handle here.
In a follow-up, CVP will make use of this.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90924
As noted in https://reviews.llvm.org/D90924#inline-1076197
apparently this is a pretty common pattern,
let's not repeat it yet again, but have it in a common place.
There may be some more places where it could be used,
but these are the most obvious ones.
There's precedent for that in `CreateOr()`/`CreateAnd()`.
The motivation here is to avoid bloating the run-time check's IR
in `SCEVExpander::generateOverflowCheck()`.
Refs. https://reviews.llvm.org/D109368#3089809
Otherwise, ODRUniquing would map some member method/variable MDNodes
to have enum type DIScope, resulting in invalid debug info and bad
DWARF.
- Add a Verifier check that when a 'scope:' operand is an ODR type that is not an enum.
- Makes ODRUniquing apply to only ODR types with the same tag so that the debuginfo/DWARF is well-formed.
Reviewed By: probinson, aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111770
As discussed in:
* https://reviews.llvm.org/D94166
* https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-September/145031.html
The GlobalIndirectSymbol class lost most of its meaning in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D109792, which disambiguated getBaseObject
(now getAliaseeObject) between GlobalIFunc and everything else.
In addition, as long as GlobalIFunc is not a GlobalObject and
getAliaseeObject returns GlobalObjects, a GlobalAlias whose aliasee
is a GlobalIFunc cannot currently be modeled properly. Creating
aliases for GlobalIFuncs does happen in the wild (e.g. glibc). In addition,
calling getAliaseeObject on a GlobalIFunc will currently return nullptr,
which is undesirable because it should return the object itself for
non-aliases.
This patch refactors the GlobalIFunc class to inherit directly from
GlobalObject, and removes GlobalIndirectSymbol (while inlining the
relevant parts into GlobalAlias and GlobalIFunc). This allows for
calling getAliaseeObject() on a GlobalIFunc to return the GlobalIFunc
itself, making getAliaseeObject() more consistent and enabling
alias-to-ifunc to be properly modeled in the IR.
I exercised some judgement in the API clients of GlobalIndirectSymbol:
some were 'monomorphized' for GlobalAlias and GlobalIFunc, and
some remained shared (with the type adapted to become GlobalValue).
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108872
The multiply() implementation is very slow -- it performs six
multiplications in double the bitwidth, which means that it will
typically work on allocated APInts and bypass fast-path
implementations. Add an additional implementation that doesn't
try to produce anything better than a full range if overflow is
possible. At least for the BasicAA use-case, we really don't care
about more precise modeling of overflow behavior. The current
use of multiply() is fine while the implementation is limited to
a single index, but extending it to the multiple-index case makes
the compile-time impact untenable.
For the common case where the shift amount is constant (a single
element range) we can easily compute a precise range (up to
unsigned envelope), so do that.
We always want to check correctness, but for some operations we
can only guarantee optimality for a subset of inputs. Accept an
additional predicate that determines whether optimality for a
given pair of ranges should be checked.
Print a friendly error message including the inputs, result and
not-contained element if an exhaustive correctness test fails,
same as we do if the optimality test fails.
Currently the max alignment representable is 1GB, see D108661.
Setting the align of an object to 4GB is desirable in some cases to make sure the lower 32 bits are clear which can be used for some optimizations, e.g. https://crbug.com/1016945.
This uses an extra bit in instructions that carry an alignment. We can store 15 bits of "free" information, and with this change some instructions (e.g. AtomicCmpXchgInst) use 14 bits.
We can increase the max alignment representable above 4GB (up to 2^62) since we're only using 33 of the 64 values, but I've just limited it to 4GB for now.
The one place we have to update the bitcode format is for the alloca instruction. It stores its alignment into 5 bits of a 32 bit bitfield. I've added another field which is 8 bits and should be future proof for a while. For backward compatibility, we check if the old field has a value and use that, otherwise use the new field.
Updating clang's max allowed alignment will come in a future patch.
Reviewed By: hans
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110451
Currently the max alignment representable is 1GB, see D108661.
Setting the align of an object to 4GB is desirable in some cases to make sure the lower 32 bits are clear which can be used for some optimizations, e.g. https://crbug.com/1016945.
This uses an extra bit in instructions that carry an alignment. We can store 15 bits of "free" information, and with this change some instructions (e.g. AtomicCmpXchgInst) use 14 bits.
We can increase the max alignment representable above 4GB (up to 2^62) since we're only using 33 of the 64 values, but I've just limited it to 4GB for now.
The one place we have to update the bitcode format is for the alloca instruction. It stores its alignment into 5 bits of a 32 bit bitfield. I've added another field which is 8 bits and should be future proof for a while. For backward compatibility, we check if the old field has a value and use that, otherwise use the new field.
Updating clang's max allowed alignment will come in a future patch.
Reviewed By: hans
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110451
Currently the max alignment representable is 1GB, see D108661.
Setting the align of an object to 4GB is desirable in some cases to make sure the lower 32 bits are clear which can be used for some optimizations, e.g. https://crbug.com/1016945.
This uses an extra bit in instructions that carry an alignment. We can store 15 bits of "free" information, and with this change some instructions (e.g. AtomicCmpXchgInst) use 14 bits.
We can increase the max alignment representable above 4GB (up to 2^62) since we're only using 33 of the 64 values, but I've just limited it to 4GB for now.
The one place we have to update the bitcode format is for the alloca instruction. It stores its alignment into 5 bits of a 32 bit bitfield. I've added another field which is 8 bits and should be future proof for a while. For backward compatibility, we check if the old field has a value and use that, otherwise use the new field.
Updating clang's max allowed alignment will come in a future patch.
Reviewed By: hans
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110451
Stop using APInt constructors and methods that were soft-deprecated in
D109483. This fixes all the uses I found in llvm, except for the APInt
unit tests which should still test the deprecated methods.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110807
This patch adds the functionalities to print MDNode in tree shape. For
example, instead of printing a MDNode like this:
```
<0x5643e1166888> = !DILocalVariable(name: "foo", arg: 2, scope: <0x5643e11c9740>, file: <0x5643e11c6ec0>, line: 8, type: <0x5643e11ca8e0>, flags: DIFlagPublic | DIFlagFwdDecl, align: 8)
```
The printTree/dumpTree functions can give you:
```
<0x5643e1166888> = !DILocalVariable(name: "foo", arg: 2, scope: <0x5643e11c9740>, file: <0x5643e11c6ec0>, line: 8, type: <0x5643e11ca8e0>, flags: DIFlagPublic | DIFlagFwdDecl, align: 8)
<0x5643e11c9740> = distinct !DISubprogram(scope: null, spFlags: 0)
<0x5643e11c6ec0> = distinct !DIFile(filename: "file.c", directory: "/path/to/dir")
<0x5643e11ca8e0> = distinct !DIDerivedType(tag: DW_TAG_pointer_type, baseType: <0x5643e11668d8>, size: 1, align: 2)
<0x5643e11668d8> = !DIBasicType(tag: DW_TAG_unspecified_type, name: "basictype")
```
Which is useful when using it in debugger. Where sometimes printing the
whole module to see all MDNodes is too expensive.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110113
This patch introduces the vector-predicated version of the
experimental_vector_splice intrinsic [1] at the IR level. It considers
the active vector length for both vectors and and uses a vector mask to
disable certain lanes in the result.
[1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D94708
Change originally authored by Vineet Kumar <vineet.kumar@bsc.es>
Reviewed By: simoll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103898
This patch is for fixing potential insertElement-related bugs like D93818.
```
V = UndefValue::get(VecTy);
for(...)
V = Builder.CreateInsertElementy(V, Elt, Idx);
=>
V = PoisonValue::get(VecTy);
for(...)
V = Builder.CreateInsertElementy(V, Elt, Idx);
```
Like above, this patch changes the placeholder V to poison.
The patch will be separated into several commits.
Reviewed By: aqjune
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110311
- This patch adds in the GOFF mangling support to the LLVM data layout string. A corresponding additional line has been added into the data layout section in the language reference documentation.
- Furthermore, this patch also sets the right data layout string for the z/OS target in the SystemZ backend.
Reviewed By: uweigand, Kai, abhina.sreeskantharajan, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109362
New field `elements` is added to '!DIImportedEntity', representing
list of aliased entities.
This is needed to dump optimized debugging information where all names
in a module are imported, but a few names are imported with overriding
aliases.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109343
Currently, opaque pointers are supported in two forms: The
-force-opaque-pointers mode, where all pointers are opaque and
typed pointers do not exist. And as a simple ptr type that can
coexist with typed pointers.
This patch removes support for the mixed mode. You either get
typed pointers, or you get opaque pointers, but not both. In the
(current) default mode, using ptr is forbidden. In -opaque-pointers
mode, all pointers are opaque.
The motivation here is that the mixed mode introduces additional
issues that don't exist in fully opaque mode. D105155 is an example
of a design problem. Looking at D109259, it would probably need
additional work to support mixed mode (e.g. to generate GEPs for
typed base but opaque result). Mixed mode will also end up
inserting many casts between i8* and ptr, which would require
significant additional work to consistently avoid.
I don't think the mixed mode is particularly valuable, as it
doesn't align with our end goal. The only thing I've found it to
be moderately useful for is adding some opaque pointer tests in
between typed pointer tests, but I think we can live without that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109290
This renames the primary methods for creating a zero value to `getZero`
instead of `getNullValue` and renames predicates like `isAllOnesValue`
to simply `isAllOnes`. This achieves two things:
1) This starts standardizing predicates across the LLVM codebase,
following (in this case) ConstantInt. The word "Value" doesn't
convey anything of merit, and is missing in some of the other things.
2) Calling an integer "null" doesn't make any sense. The original sin
here is mine and I've regretted it for years. This moves us to calling
it "zero" instead, which is correct!
APInt is widely used and I don't think anyone is keen to take massive source
breakage on anything so core, at least not all in one go. As such, this
doesn't actually delete any entrypoints, it "soft deprecates" them with a
comment.
Included in this patch are changes to a bunch of the codebase, but there are
more. We should normalize SelectionDAG and other APIs as well, which would
make the API change more mechanical.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109483
llvm.vp.select extends the regular select instruction with an explicit
vector length (%evl).
All lanes with indexes at and above %evl are
undefined. Lanes below %evl are taken from the first input where the
mask is true and from the second input otherwise.
Reviewed By: rogfer01
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105351
Generate btf_tag annotations for function parameters.
A field "annotations" is introduced to DILocalVariable, and
annotations are represented as an DINodeArray, similar to
DIComposite elements. The following example illustrates how
annotations are encoded in IR:
distinct !DILocalVariable(name: "info",, arg: 1, ..., annotations: !10)
!10 = !{!11, !12}
!11 = !{!"btf_tag", !"a"}
!12 = !{!"btf_tag", !"b"}
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106620
Generate btf_tag annotations for DIGlobalVariable.
A field "annotations" is introduced to DIGlobalVariable, and
annotations are represented as an DINodeArray, similar to
DIComposite elements. The following example illustrates how
annotations are encoded in IR:
distinct !DIGlobalVariable(..., annotations: !10)
!10 = !{!11, !12}
!11 = !{!"btf_tag", !"a"}
!12 = !{!"btf_tag", !"b"}
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106619
In LLVM IR, `AlignmentBitfieldElementT` is 5-bit wide
But that means that the maximal alignment exponent is `(1<<5)-2`,
which is `30`, not `29`. And indeed, alignment of `1073741824`
roundtrips IR serialization-deserialization.
While this doesn't seem all that important, this doubles
the maximal supported alignment from 512MiB to 1GiB,
and there's actually one noticeable use-case for that;
On X86, the huge pages can have sizes of 2MiB and 1GiB (!).
So while this doesn't add support for truly huge alignments,
which i think we can easily-ish do if wanted, i think this adds
zero-cost support for a not-trivially-dismissable case.
I don't believe we need any upgrade infrastructure,
and since we don't explicitly record the IR version,
we don't need to bump one either.
As @craig.topper speculates in D108661#2963519,
this might be an artificial limit imposed by the original implementation
of the `getAlignment()` functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108661
Clang patch D106614 added attribute btf_tag support. This patch
generates btf_tag annotations for DIComposite types.
A field "annotations" is introduced to DIComposite, and the
annotations are represented as an DINodeArray, similar to
DIComposite elements. The following example illustrates
how annotations are encoded in IR:
distinct !DICompositeType(..., annotations: !10)
!10 = !{!11, !12}
!11 = !{!"btf_tag", !"a"}
!12 = !{!"btf_tag", !"b"}
Each btf_tag annotation is represented as a 2D array of
meta strings. Each record may have more than one
btf_tag annotations, as in the above example.
Reland with additional fixes for llvm/unittests/IR/DebugTypeODRUniquingTest.cpp.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106615
This patch adds vector-predicated ("VP") reduction intrinsics corresponding to
each of the existing unpredicated `llvm.vector.reduce.*` versions. Unlike the
unpredicated reductions, all VP reductions have a start value. This start value
is returned when the no vector element is active.
Support for expansion on targets without native vector-predication support is
included.
This patch is based on the ["reduction
slice"](https://reviews.llvm.org/D57504#1732277) of the LLVM-VP reference patch
(https://reviews.llvm.org/D57504).
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104308
AttributeList::hasAttribute() is confusing, use clearer methods like
hasParamAttr()/hasRetAttr().
Add hasRetAttr() since it was missing from AttributeList.
Nikita Popov