As discussed on the RFC [0], I am sharing the set of patches that
enables checking of original Debug Info metadata preservation in
optimizations. The proof-of-concept/proposal can be found at [1].
The implementation from the [1] was full of duplicated code,
so this set of patches tries to merge this approach into the existing
debugify utility.
For example, the utility pass in the original-debuginfo-check
mode could be invoked as follows:
$ opt -verify-debuginfo-preserve -pass-to-test sample.ll
Since this is very initial stage of the implementation,
there is a space for improvements such as:
- Add support for the new pass manager
- Add support for metadata other than DILocations and DISubprograms
[0] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/llvm-dev/QOyF-38YPlE/G213uiuwCAAJ
[1] https://github.com/djolertrk/llvm-di-checker
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82545
The test that was failing is now forced to use the old PM.
As discussed on the RFC [0], I am sharing the set of patches that
enables checking of original Debug Info metadata preservation in
optimizations. The proof-of-concept/proposal can be found at [1].
The implementation from the [1] was full of duplicated code,
so this set of patches tries to merge this approach into the existing
debugify utility.
For example, the utility pass in the original-debuginfo-check
mode could be invoked as follows:
$ opt -verify-debuginfo-preserve -pass-to-test sample.ll
Since this is very initial stage of the implementation,
there is a space for improvements such as:
- Add support for the new pass manager
- Add support for metadata other than DILocations and DISubprograms
[0] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/llvm-dev/QOyF-38YPlE/G213uiuwCAAJ
[1] https://github.com/djolertrk/llvm-di-checker
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82545
This commit fixes how metadata is handled in CloneModule to be sound,
and improves how it's handled in CloneFunctionInto (although the latter
is still awkward when called within a module).
Ruiling Song pointed out in PR48841 that CloneModule was changed to
unsoundly use the RF_ReuseAndMutateDistinctMDs flag (renamed in
fa35c1f80f for clarity). This flag papered
over a crash caused by other various changes made to CloneFunctionInto
over the past few years that made it unsound to use cloning between
different modules.
(This commit partially addresses PR48841, fixing the repro from
preprocessed source but not textual IR. MDNodeMapper::mapDistinctNode
became unsound in df763188c9 and this
commit does not address that regression.)
RF_ReuseAndMutateDistinctMDs is designed for the IRMover to use,
avoiding unnecessary clones of all referenced metadata when linking
between modules (with IRMover, the source module is discarded after
linking). It never makes sense to use when you're not discarding the
source. This commit drops its incorrect use in CloneModule.
Sadly, the right thing to do with metadata when cloning a function is
complicated, and this patch doesn't totally fix it.
The first problem is that there are two different types of referenceable
metadata and it's not obvious what to with one of them when remapping.
- `!0 = !{!1}` is metadata's version of a constant. Programatically it's
called "uniqued" (probably a better term would be "constant") because,
like `ConstantArray`, it's stored in uniquing tables. Once it's
constructed, it's illegal to change its arguments.
- `!0 = distinct !{!1}` is a bit closer to a global variable. It's legal
to change the operands after construction.
What should be done with distinct metadata when cloning functions within
the same module?
- Should new, cloned nodes be created?
- Should all references point to the same, old nodes?
The answer depends on whether that metadata is effectively owned by a
function.
And that's the second problem. Referenceable metadata's ownership model
is not clear or explicit. Technically, it's all stored on an
LLVMContext. However, any metadata that is `distinct`, that transitively
references a `distinct` node, or that transitively references a
GlobalValue is specific to a Module and is effectively owned by it. More
specifically, some metadata is effectively owned by a specific Function
within a module.
Effectively function-local metadata was introduced somewhere around
c10d0e5ccd, which made it illegal for two
functions to share a DISubprogram attachment.
When cloning a function within a module, you need to clone the
function-local debug info and suppress cloning of global debug info (the
status quo suppresses cloning some global debug info but not all). When
cloning a function to a new/different module, you need to clone all of
the debug info.
Here's what I think we should do (eventually? soon? not this patch
though):
- Distinguish explicitly (somehow) between pure constant metadata owned
by the LLVMContext, global metadata owned by the Module, and local
metadata owned by a GlobalValue (such as a function).
- Update CloneFunctionInto to trigger cloning of all "local" metadata
(only), perhaps by adding a bit to RemapFlag. Alternatively, split
out a separate function CloneFunctionMetadataInto to prime the
metadata map that callers are updated to call ahead of time as
appropriate.
Here's the somewhat more isolated fix in this patch:
- Converted the `ModuleLevelChanges` parameter to `CloneFunctionInto` to
an enum called `CloneFunctionChangeType` that is one of
LocalChangesOnly, GlobalChanges, DifferentModule, and ClonedModule.
- The code maintaining the "functions uniquely own subprograms"
invariant is now only active in the first two cases, where a function
is being cloned within a single module. That's necessary because this
code inhibits cloning of (some) "global" metadata that's effectively
owned by the module.
- The code maintaining the "all compile units must be explicitly
referenced by !llvm.dbg.cu" invariant is now only active in the
DifferentModule case, where a function is being cloned into a new
module in isolation.
- CoroSplit.cpp's call to CloneFunctionInto in CoroCloner::create
uses LocalChangeOnly, since fa635d730f
only set `ModuleLevelChanges` to trigger cloning of local metadata.
- CloneModule drops its unsound use of RF_ReuseAndMutateDistinctMDs
and special handling of !llvm.dbg.cu.
- Fixed some outdated header docs and left a couple of FIXMEs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96531
The individual recipes have been updated to manage their operands using
VPUser a while back. Now that the transition is done, we can instead
make VPRecipeBase a VPUser and get rid of the toVPUser helper.
Rename the `RF_MoveDistinctMDs` flag passed into `MapValue` and
`MapMetadata` to `RF_ReuseAndMutateDistinctMDs` in order to more
precisely describe its effect and clarify the header documentation.
Found this while helping to investigate PR48841, which pointed out an
unsound use of the flag in `CloneModule()`. For now I've just added a
FIXME there, but I'm hopeful that the new (more precise) name will
prevent other similar errors.
I am trying to untangle the fast-math-flags propagation logic
in the vectorizers (see a6f022127 for SLP).
The loop vectorizer has a mix of checking FP function attributes,
IR-level FMF, and just wrong assumptions.
I am trying to avoid regressions while fixing this, and I think
the IR-level logic is good enough for that, but it's hard to say
for sure. This would be the 1st step in the clean-up.
The existing test that I changed to include 'fast' actually shows
a miscompile: the function only had the equivalent of nnan, but we
created new instructions that had fast (all FMF set). This is
similar to the example in https://llvm.org/PR35538
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95452
This patch unifies the way recipes and VPValues are printed after the
transition to VPDef.
VPSlotTracker has been updated to iterate over all recipes and all
their defined values to number those. There is no need to number
values in Value2VPValue.
It also updates a few places that only used slot numbers for
VPInstruction. All recipes now can produce numbered VPValues.
The new test case here contains a first order recurrences and an
instruction that is replicated. The first order recurrence forces an
instruction to be sunk _into_, as opposed to after the replication
region. That causes several things to go wrong including registering
vector instructions multiple times and failing to create dominance
relations correctly.
Instead we should be sinking to after the replication region, which is
what this patch makes sure happens.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93629
This is a follow-up patch of D87045.
The patch implements "loop-nest mode" for `LPMUpdater` and `FunctionToLoopPassAdaptor` in which only top-level loops are operated.
`createFunctionToLoopPassAdaptor` decides whether the returned adaptor is in loop-nest mode or not based on the given pass. If the pass is a loop-nest pass or the pass is a `LoopPassManager` which contains only loop-nest passes, the loop-nest version of adaptor is returned; otherwise, the normal (loop) version of adaptor is returned.
Reviewed By: Whitney
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87531
This patch makes VPRecipeBase a direct subclass of VPDef, moving the
SubclassID to VPDef.
Reviewed By: gilr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90564
This patch turns updates VPInterleaveRecipe to manage the values it defines
using VPDef. The VPValue is used during VPlan construction and
codegeneration instead of the plain IR reference where possible.
Reviewed By: gilr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90562
This PR implements the function splitBasicBlockBefore to address an
issue
that occurred during SplitEdge(BB, Succ, ...), inside splitBlockBefore.
The issue occurs in SplitEdge when the Succ has a single predecessor
and the edge between the BB and Succ is not critical. This produces
the result ‘BB->Succ->New’. The new function splitBasicBlockBefore
was added to splitBlockBefore to handle the issue and now produces
the correct result ‘BB->New->Succ’.
Below is an example of splitting the block bb1 at its first instruction.
/// Original IR
bb0:
br bb1
bb1:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
/// IR after splitEdge(bb0, bb1) using splitBasicBlock
bb0:
br bb1
bb1:
br bb1.split
bb1.split:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
/// IR after splitEdge(bb0, bb1) using splitBasicBlockBefore
bb0:
br bb1.split
bb1.split
br bb1
bb1:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92200
This PR implements the function splitBasicBlockBefore to address an
issue
that occurred during SplitEdge(BB, Succ, ...), inside splitBlockBefore.
The issue occurs in SplitEdge when the Succ has a single predecessor
and the edge between the BB and Succ is not critical. This produces
the result ‘BB->Succ->New’. The new function splitBasicBlockBefore
was added to splitBlockBefore to handle the issue and now produces
the correct result ‘BB->New->Succ’.
Below is an example of splitting the block bb1 at its first instruction.
/// Original IR
bb0:
br bb1
bb1:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
/// IR after splitEdge(bb0, bb1) using splitBasicBlock
bb0:
br bb1
bb1:
br bb1.split
bb1.split:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
/// IR after splitEdge(bb0, bb1) using splitBasicBlockBefore
bb0:
br bb1.split
bb1.split
br bb1
bb1:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92200
... so just ensure that we pass DomTreeUpdater it into it.
Fixes DomTree preservation for a large number of tests,
all of which are marked as such so that they do not regress.
Per http://llvm.org/OpenProjects.html#llvm_loopnest, the goal of this
patch (and other following patches) is to create facilities that allow
implementing loop nest passes that run on top-level loop nests for the
New Pass Manager.
This patch extends the functionality of LoopPassManager to handle
loop-nest passes by specializing the definition of LoopPassManager that
accepts both kinds of passes in addPass.
Only loop passes are executed if L is not a top-level one, and both
kinds of passes are executed if L is top-level. Currently, loop nest
passes should have the following run method:
PreservedAnalyses run(LoopNest &, LoopAnalysisManager &,
LoopStandardAnalysisResults &, LPMUpdater &);
Reviewed By: Whitney, ychen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87045
This PR implements the function splitBasicBlockBefore to address an
issue
that occurred during SplitEdge(BB, Succ, ...), inside splitBlockBefore.
The issue occurs in SplitEdge when the Succ has a single predecessor
and the edge between the BB and Succ is not critical. This produces
the result ‘BB->Succ->New’. The new function splitBasicBlockBefore
was added to splitBlockBefore to handle the issue and now produces
the correct result ‘BB->New->Succ’.
Below is an example of splitting the block bb1 at its first instruction.
/// Original IR
bb0:
br bb1
bb1:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
/// IR after splitEdge(bb0, bb1) using splitBasicBlock
bb0:
br bb1
bb1:
br bb1.split
bb1.split:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
/// IR after splitEdge(bb0, bb1) using splitBasicBlockBefore
bb0:
br bb1.split
bb1.split
br bb1
bb1:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92200
1. Removed #include "...AliasAnalysis.h" in other headers and modules.
2. Cleaned up includes in AliasAnalysis.h.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92489
Interleave groups also depend on the values they store. Manage the
stored values as VPUser operands. This is currently a NFC, but is
required to allow VPlan transforms and to manage generated vector values
exclusively in VPTransformState.
This is a follow-up to 00a6601136 to make
isa<VPReductionRecipe> work and unifies the VPValue ID names, by making
sure they all consistently start with VPV*.
This patch introduces a new VPDef class, which can be used to
manage VPValues defined by recipes/VPInstructions.
The idea here is to mirror VPUser for values defined by a recipe. A
VPDef can produce either zero (e.g. a store recipe), one (most recipes)
or multiple (VPInterleaveRecipe) result VPValues.
To traverse the def-use chain from a VPDef to its users, one has to
traverse the users of all values defined by a VPDef.
VPValues now contain a pointer to their corresponding VPDef, if one
exists. To traverse the def-use chain upwards from a VPValue, we first
need to check if the VPValue is defined by a VPDef. If it does not have
a VPDef, this means we have a VPValue that is not directly defined
iniside the plan and we are done.
If we have a VPDef, it is defined inside the region by a recipe, which
is a VPUser, and the upwards def-use chain traversal continues by
traversing all its operands.
Note that we need to add an additional field to to VPVAlue to link them
to their defs. The space increase is going to be offset by being able to
remove the SubclassID field in future patches.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90558
Update the code responsible for deleting VPBBs and recipes to properly
update users and release operands.
This is another preparation for D84680 & following patches towards
enabling modeling def-use chains in VPlan.
This adds a helper to convert a VPRecipeBase pointer to a VPUser, for
recipes that inherit from VPUser. Once VPRecipeBase directly inherits
from VPUser this helper can be removed.
When updating operands of a VPUser, we also have to adjust the list of
users for the new and old VPValues. This is required once we start
transitioning recipes to become VPValues.
Now that VPUser is not inheriting from VPValue, we can take the next
step and turn the recipes that already manage their operands via VPUser
into VPUsers directly. This is another small step towards traversing
def-use chains in VPlan.
This is NFC with respect to the generated code, but makes the interface
more powerful.
Currently SCEVExpander creates inttoptr for non-integral pointers if the
base is a null constant for example. This results in invalid IR.
This patch changes InsertNoopCastOfTo to emit a GEP & bitcast to convert
to a non-integral pointer. First, a GEP of i8* null is generated and the
integral value is used as index. The GEP is then bitcasted to the target
type.
This was exposed by D71539.
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87827
~~D65060 uncovered that trying to use BFI in loop passes can lead to non-deterministic behavior when blocks are re-used while retaining old BFI data.~~
~~To make sure BFI is preserved through loop passes a Value Handle (VH) callback is registered on blocks themselves. When a block is freed it now also wipes out the accompanying BFI entry such that stale BFI data can no longer persist resolving the determinism issue. ~~
~~An optimistic approach would be to incrementally update BFI information throughout the loop passes rather than only invalidating them on removed blocks. The issues with that are:~~
~~1. It is not clear how BFI information should be incrementally updated: If a block is duplicated does its BFI information come with? How about if it's split/modified/moved around? ~~
~~2. Assuming we can address these problems the implementation here will be a massive undertaking. ~~
~~There's a known need of BFI in LICM analysis which requires correct but not incrementally updated BFI data. A follow-up change can register BFI in all loop passes so this preserved but potentially lossy data is available to any loop pass that wants it.~~
See: D75341 for an identical implementation of preserving BFI via VH callbacks. The previous statements do still apply but this change no longer has to be in this diff because it's already upstream 😄 .
This diff also moves BFI to be a part of LoopStandardAnalysisResults since the previous method using getCachedResults now (correctly!) statically asserts (D72893) that this data isn't static through the loop passes.
Testing
Ninja check
Reviewed By: asbirlea, nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86156
When trying to enable -debug-info-kind=constructor there was an assert
that occurs during debug info cloning ("mismatched subprogram between
llvm.dbg.value variable and !dbg attachment").
It appears that during llvm::CloneFunctionInto, a DISubprogram could be
duplicated when MapMetadata is called, and then added to the MD map again
when DIFinder gets a list of subprograms. This results in two different
versions of the DISubprogram.
This patch switches the order so that the DIFinder subprograms are
added before MapMetadata is called.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46784
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86185
This reverts the revert commit dc28675768.
It includes a fix for Polly, which uses SCEVExpander on IR that is not
in LCSSA form. Set PreserveLCSSA = false in that case, to ensure we do
not introduce LCSSA phis where there were none before.
This reverts commit 99166fd4fb, because it
breaks the polly builders.
polly/test/Isl/CodeGen/invariant_load_escaping_second_scop.ll fails
because a apparently unnecessary LCSSA phi node is introduced.
Make the bots green again, while I take a closer look.
This patch teaches SCEVExpander to directly preserve LCSSA.
As it is currently, SCEV does not look through PHI nodes in loops,
as it might break LCSSA form. Once SCEVExpander can preserve
LCSSA form, it should be safe for SCEV to look through PHIs.
To preserve LCSSA form, this patch uses formLCSSAForInstructions
on operands of newly created instructions, if the definition is inside
a different loop than the new instruction.
The final value we return from expandCodeFor may also need LCSSA
phis, depending on the insert point. As no user for it exists there yet,
create a temporary instruction at the insert point, which can be passed
to formLCSSAForInstructions. This temporary instruction is removed
after LCSSA construction.
Reviewed By: mkazantsev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71538
PassManager.h is one of the top headers in the ClangBuildAnalyzer frontend worst offenders list.
This exposes a large number of implicit dependencies on various forward declarations/includes in other headers that need addressing.
Summary: This patch adds more test case focusing on data dependency.
Authored By: RithikSharma
Reviewer: Whitney, bmahjour, etiotto
Reviewed By: Whitney
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tag: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83543
The dependencies in llvm/unittests/Transforms/IPO/CMakeLists.txt
introduced in revision 0750757e were incomplete, leading to link errors
for a DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=True build.
Summary: This patch introduces basic unittest interface for the Attributor and a simple test case for casting.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, sstefan1, uenoku, homerdin, baziotis
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: mgorny, uenoku, kuter, okura, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83754
Summary: This patch makes code motion checks optional which are dependent on
specific analysis example, dominator tree, post dominator tree and dependence
info. The aim is to make the adoption of CodeMoverUtils easier for clients that
don't use analysis which were strictly required by CodeMoverUtils. This will
also help in diversifying code motion checks using other analysis example MSSA.
Authored By: RithikSharma
Reviewer: Whitney, bmahjour, etiotto
Reviewed By: Whitney
Subscribers: Prazek, hiraditya, george.burgess.iv, asbirlea, llvm-commits
Tag: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82566
Move ScalarEvolution::forgetLoopDispositions implementation to ScalarEvolution.cpp to remove the dependency.
Add implicit header dependency to source files where necessary.
code motion
Summary: Currently isSafeToMoveBefore uses DFS numbering for determining
the relative position of instruction and insert point which is not
always correct. This PR proposes the use of Dominator Tree depth for the
same. If a node is at a higher level than the insert point then it is
safe to say that we want to move in the forward direction.
Authored By: RithikSharma
Reviewer: Whitney, nikic, bmahjour, etiotto, fhahn
Reviewed By: Whitney
Subscribers: fhahn, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tag: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80084
Hide the method that allows setting probability for particular edge
and introduce a public method that sets probabilities for all
outgoing edges at once.
Setting individual edge probability is error prone. More over it is
difficult to check that the total probability is 1.0 because there is
no easy way to know when the user finished setting all
the probabilities.
Related bug is fixed in BranchProbabilityInfo::calcMetadataWeights().
Changing unreachable branch probabilities to raw(1) and distributing
the rest (oldProbability - raw(1)) over the reachable branches could
introduce total probability inaccuracy bigger than 1/numOfBranches.
Reviewers: yamauchi, ebrevnov
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79396
SCEVExpander modifies the underlying function so it is more suitable in
Transforms/Utils, rather than Analysis. This allows using other
transform utils in SCEVExpander.
This patch was originally committed as b8a3c34eee, but broke the
modules build, as LoopAccessAnalysis was using the Expander.
The code-gen part of LAA was moved to lib/Transforms recently, so this
patch can be landed again.
Reviewers: sanjoy.google, efriedma, reames
Reviewed By: sanjoy.google
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71537
Summary:
Analyses that are statefull should not be retrieved through a proxy from
an outer IR unit, as these analyses are only invalidated at the end of
the inner IR unit manager.
This patch disallows getting the outer manager and provides an API to
get a cached analysis through the proxy. If the analysis is not
stateless, the call to getCachedResult will assert.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, eraman, hiraditya, zzheng, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72893
Splitting critical edges for indirect branches
the SplitIndirectBrCriticalEdges() function may break branch
probabilities if target basic block happens to have unset
a probability for any of its successors. That is because in
such cases the getEdgeProbability(Target) function returns
probability 1/NumOfSuccessors and it is called after Target
was split (thus Target has a single successor). As the result
the correspondent successor of the split block gets
probability 100% but 1/NumOfSuccessors is expected (or better
be left unset).
Reviewers: yamauchi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78806
Summary:
Updated CallPromotionUtils and impacted sites. Parameters that are
expected to be non-null, and return values that are guranteed non-null,
were replaced with CallBase references rather than pointers.
Left FIXME in places where more changes are facilitated by CallBase, but
aren't CallSites: Instruction* parameters or return values, for example,
where the contract that they are actually CallBase values.
Reviewers: davidxl, dblaikie, wmi
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Subscribers: arsenm, jvesely, nhaehnle, eraman, hiraditya, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77930
This is a speculative fix to silence the spurious C4129 warning that
some version of MSVC generate for the raw string literals in the changed
files.
Before disabling the warning (D76428), try a potential fix suggested in
the review.
This patch changes VPWidenRecipe to only store a single original IR
instruction. This is the first required step towards modeling it's
operands as VPValues and also towards breaking it up into a
VPInstruction.
Discussed as part of D74695.
Reviewers: Ayal, gilr, rengolin
Reviewed By: gilr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76988
Since intrinsics can now specify when an argument is required to be
constant, it is now OK to replace arguments with variables if they
aren't. This means intrinsics must now be accurately marked with
immarg.
The latest improvements to VPValue printing make this mapping clear when
printing the operand. Printing the mapping separately is not required
any longer.
Reviewers: rengolin, hsaito, Ayal, gilr
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76375
When the an underlying value is available, we can use its name for
printing, as discussed in D73078.
Reviewers: rengolin, hsaito, Ayal, gilr
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76200
Summary:
Assume bundles need to be usable by Analysis and Transforms/Utils isn't.
so this commit moves utilities to deal with asusme bundles to IR.
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: mgorny, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75618
Summary: Finding what information is know about a value from a use is generally useful and can be done quickly.
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75616
Currently when printing VPValues we use the object address, which makes
it hard to distinguish VPValues as they usually are large numbers with
varying distance between them.
This patch adds a simple slot tracker, similar to the ModuleSlotTracker
used for IR values. In order to dump a VPValue or anything containing a
VPValue, a slot tracker for the enclosing VPlan needs to be created. The
existing VPlanPrinter can take care of that for the existing code. We
assign consecutive numbers to each VPValue we encounter in a reverse
post order traversal of the VPlan.
Reviewers: rengolin, hsaito, fhahn, Ayal, dorit, gilr
Reviewed By: gilr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73078
Summary: This patch adds a new way to query operand bundles of an llvm.assume that is much better suited to some users like the Attributor that need to do many queries on the operand bundles of llvm.assume. Some modifications of the IR like replaceAllUsesWith can cause information in the map to be outdated, so this API is more suited to analysis passes and passes that don't make modification that could invalidate the map.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, sstefan1, uenoku
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75020
This patch adds a getPlan accessor to VPBlockBase, which finds the entry
block of the plan containing the block and returns the plan set for this
block.
VPBlockBase contains a VPlan pointer, but it should only be set for
the entry block of a plan. This allows moving blocks without updating
the pointer for each moved block and in the future we might introduce a
parent relationship between plans and blocks, similar to the one in LLVM IR.
Reviewers: rengolin, hsaito, fhahn, Ayal, dorit, gilr
Reviewed By: gilr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74445
getReductionVars, getInductionVars and getFirstOrderRecurrences were all
being returned from LoopVectorizationLegality as pointers to lists. This
just changes them to be references, cleaning up the interface slightly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75448
Summary: This fixes the crash that led to the revert of D69591.
Reviewers: davidxl
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75307
Summary:
Future patches will make use of TTI to perform cost-model-driven `SCEVExpander::isHighCostExpansionHelper()`
This is a fully NFC patch to make things reviewable.
Reviewers: reames, mkazantsev, wmi, sanjoy
Reviewed By: mkazantsev
Subscribers: hiraditya, zzheng, javed.absar, dmgreen, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73704
replaceDbgDeclare is used to update the descriptions of stack variables
when they are moved (e.g. by ASan or SafeStack). A side effect of
replaceDbgDeclare is that it moves dbg.declares around in the
instruction stream (typically by hoisting them into the entry block).
This behavior was introduced in llvm/r227544 to fix an assertion failure
(llvm.org/PR22386), but no longer appears to be necessary.
Hoisting a dbg.declare generally does not create problems. Usually,
dbg.declare either describes an argument or an alloca in the entry
block, and backends have special handling to emit locations for these.
In optimized builds, LowerDbgDeclare places dbg.values in the right
spots regardless of where the dbg.declare is. And no one uses
replaceDbgDeclare to handle things like VLAs.
However, there doesn't seem to be a positive case for moving
dbg.declares around anymore, and this reordering can get in the way of
understanding other bugs. I propose getting rid of it.
Testing: stage2 RelWithDebInfo sanitized build, check-llvm
rdar://59397340
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74517
Summary: It attempts to devirtualize a call on alloca through vtable loads.
Reviewers: davidxl
Subscribers: mgorny, Prazek, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71308
During extraction, stale llvm.assume handles may be retained in the
original function. The setup is:
1) CodeExtractor unregisters assumptions in the blocks that are to be
extracted.
2) Extraction happens. There are now two functions: f1 and f1.extracted.
3) Leftover assumptions in f1 (/not/ removed as they were not in the set of
blocks to be extracted) now have affected-value llvm.assume handles in
f1.extracted.
When assumptions for a value used in f1 are looked up, ValueTracking can assert
as some of the handles are in the wrong function. To fix this, simply erase the
llvm.assume calls in the extracted function.
Alternatives include flushing the assumption cache in the original function, or
walking all values used in the original function to prune stale affected-value
handles. Both seem more expensive.
Testing: check-llvm, LNT run with -mllvm -hot-cold-split enabled
rdar://58460728
Summary:
Currently IsControlFlowEquivalent determine if two blocks are control
flow equivalent by checking if A dominates B and B post dominates A.
There exists blocks that are control flow equivalent even if they don't
satisfy the A dominates B and B post dominates A condition.
For example,
if (cond)
A
if (cond)
B
In the PR, we determine if two blocks are control flow equivalent by
also checking if the two sets of conditions A and B depends on are
equivalent.
Reviewer: jdoerfert, Meinersbur, dmgreen, etiotto, bmahjour, fhahn,
hfinkel, kbarton
Reviewed By: fhahn
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tag: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71578
In case of loops with multiple exit where all-but-one exit are deoptimizing
it might happen that the first rotation will end up with latch having a deoptimizing
exit. This makes the loop unsuitable for trip-count analysis (say, getLoopEstimatedTripCount)
as well as for loop transformations that know how to handle multple deoptimizing exits.
It pretty much means that canonical form in multple-deoptimizing-exits case should be
with non-deoptimizing exit at latch.
Teach loop-rotation to reach this canonical form by repeating rotation.
-loop-rotate-multi option introduced to control this behavior, currently disabled by default.
Reviewers: skatkov, asbirlea, reames, fhahn
Reviewed By: skatkov
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73058
SCEVExpander modifies the underlying function so it is more suitable in
Transforms/Utils, rather than Analysis. This allows using other
transform utils in SCEVExpander.
Reviewers: sanjoy.google, efriedma, reames
Reviewed By: sanjoy.google
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71537
Commit d77ae1552f
("[DebugInfo] Support to emit debugInfo for extern variables")
added deebugInfo for extern variables for BPF target.
The commit is reverted by 891e25b02d
as the committed tests using %clang instead of %clang_cc1 causing
test failed in certain scenarios as reported by Reid Kleckner.
This patch fixed the tests by using %clang_cc1.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71818
Extern variable usage in BPF is different from traditional
pure user space application. Recent discussion in linux bpf
mailing list has two use cases where debug info types are
required to use extern variables:
- extern types are required to have a suitable interface
in libbpf (bpf loader) to provide kernel config parameters
to bpf programs.
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAEf4BzYCNo5GeVGMhp3fhysQ=_axAf=23PtwaZs-yAyafmXC9g@mail.gmail.com/T/#t
- extern types are required so kernel bpf verifier can
verify program which uses external functions more precisely.
This will make later link with actual external function no
need to reverify.
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/87eez4odqp.fsf@toke.dk/T/#m8d5c3e87ffe7f2764e02d722cb0d8cbc136880ed
This patch added clang support to emit debuginfo for extern variables
with a TargetInfo hook to enable it. The debuginfo for the
extern variable is emitted only if that extern variable is
referenced in the current compilation unit.
Currently, only BPF target enables to generate debug info for
extern variables. The emission of such debuginfo is disabled for C++
at this moment since BPF only supports a subset of C language.
Emission with C++ can be enabled later if an appropriate use case
is identified.
-fstandalone-debug permits us to see more debuginfo with the cost
of bloated binary size. This patch did not add emission of extern
variable debug info with -fstandalone-debug. This can be
re-evaluated if there is a real need.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70696
AssumptionCache can be null in SimplifyCFGOptions. However, FoldCondBranchOnPHI() was not properly handling that when passing a null AssumptionCache to simplifyCFG.
Patch by Rodrigo Caetano Rocha <rcor.cs@gmail.com>
Reviewers: fhahn, lebedev.ri, spatel
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69963
The file is intended to gather various VPlan transformations, not only
CFG related transforms. Actually, the only transformation there is not
CFG related.
Reviewers: Ayal, gilr, hsaito, rengolin
Reviewed By: gilr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70732
InnerLoopVectorizer's code called during VPlan execution still relies on
original IR's def-use relations to decide which vector code to generate,
limiting VPlan transformations ability to modify def-use relations and still
have ILV generate the vector code.
This commit moves GEP operand queries controlling how GEPs are widened to a
dedicated recipe and extracts GEP widening code to its own ILV method taking
those recorded decisions as arguments. This reduces ingredient def-use usage by
ILV as a step towards full VPlan-based def-use relations.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69067
Summary:
This is one more prep step necessary before the code gen pass instrumentation
code could go in.
Reviewers: davidxl
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70988
Summary:
Related bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40648
Static helper function rewriteDebugUsers in Local.cpp deletes dbg.value
intrinsics when it cannot move or rewrite them, or salvage the deleted
instruction's value. It should instead undef them in this case.
This patch fixes that and I've added a test which covers the failing test
case in bz40648. I've updated the unit test Local.ReplaceAllDbgUsesWith
to check for this behaviour (and fixed a typo in the test which would
cause the old test to always pass).
Reviewers: aprantl, vsk, djtodoro, probinson
Reviewed By: vsk
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70604
moved before another instruction.
Summary:Added an API to check if an instruction can be safely moved
before another instruction. In future PRs, we will like to add support
of moving instructions between blocks that are not control flow
equivalent, and add other APIs to enhance usability, e.g. moving basic
blocks, moving list of instructions...
Loop Fusion will be its first user. When there is intervening code in
between two loops, fusion is currently unable to fuse them. Loop Fusion
can use this utility to check if the intervening code can be safely
moved before or after the two loops, and move them, then it can
successfully fuse them.
Reviewer:kbarton,jdoerfert,Meinersbur,bmahjour,etiotto
Reviewed By:bmahjour
Subscribers:mgorny,hiraditya,llvm-commits
Tag:LLVM
Differential Revision:https://reviews.llvm.org/D70049
Djordje Todorovic