Implement the new sparse_tensor.reduce operation which
accepts a starting identity value and a code block
describing how to perform the reduction.
Reviewed by: aartbik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130573
The end-to-end test for this new feature also exposed a bug
in LLVM IR lowering (since then, fixed), where we need to account
for the min-poison bit as extra argument.
declare i32 @llvm.abs.i32(i32 <src>, i1 <is_int_min_poison>)
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131712
They appeared at the wrong place in the switch, treating
them as unary op rather than binary op.
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131509
Using "default:" in the switch statemements that handle all our
merger ops has become a bit cumbersome since it is easy to overlook
parts of the code that need to handle ops specifically. By enforcing
full switch statements without "default:", we get a compiler warning
when cases are overlooked.
Reviewed By: wrengr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127263
Adds zero-preserving unary operators from std. Also adds xor.
Performs minor refactoring to remove "zero" node, and pushed
the irregular logic for negi (not support in std) into one place.
Reviewed By: gussmith23
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105928
This is a fix of https://reviews.llvm.org/D104956, which broke the gcc5 build.
We opt to use unit tests rather than check tests as the lattice/merger code is a small C++ component with a well-defined API. Testing this API via check tests would be far less direct and readable. In addition, as the check tests will only be able to test the API indirectly, the tests may break based on unrelated changes; e.g. changes in linalg.
Reviewed By: aartbik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105828
We opt to use unit tests rather than check tests as the lattice/merger code is a small C++ component with a well-defined API. Testing this API via check tests would be far less direct and readable. In addition, as the check tests will only be able to test the API indirectly, the tests may break based on unrelated changes; e.g. changes in linalg.
Reviewed By: aartbik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104956
Jim Kitchen