Reapply with fixes for clang tests.
-----
This is a simple enum attribute. Test changes are because enum
attributes are sorted before type attributes, so mustprogress is
now in a different position.
When building the member call to a user conversion function during an
implicit cast, the expression was not being checked for immediate
invocation, so we were never adding the ConstantExpr node to AST.
This would cause the call to the user conversion operator to be emitted
even if it was constantexpr evaluated, and this would even trip an
assert when said user conversion was declared consteval:
`Assertion failed: !cast<FunctionDecl>(GD.getDecl())->isConsteval() && "consteval function should never be emitted", file clang\lib\CodeGen\CodeGenModule.cpp, line 3530`
Fixes PR48855.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105446
copy/dispose helper functions
We found out that these fake functions would cause clang to crash if the
changes proposed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D98799 were made.
The original patch was reverted in f681fd927e
because debug locations were missing in the body of the block byref
helper functions. This patch fixes the bug by calling CreateArtificial
after the calls to StartFunction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104082
Non-throwing allocators currently will always get null-check code. However, if the non-throwing allocator is explicitly annotated with returns_nonnull the null check should be elided.
Testing:
ninja check-all
added test case correctly elides
Reviewed By: bruno
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102820
On x86_64 mingw, long doubles are always passed indirectly as
arguments (see an existing case in WinX86_64ABIInfo::classify);
generalize the existing code for reading varargs - any non-aggregate
type that is larger than 64 bits (which would be both long double
in mingw, and __int128) are passed indirectly too.
This makes reading varargs consistent with how they're passed,
fixing interop with both gcc and clang callers, for long double
and __int128.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103452
This fixes PR49198: Wrong usage of __dso_handle in user code leads to
a compiler crash.
When Init is an address of the global itself, we need to track it
across RAUW. Otherwise the initializer can be destroyed if the global
is replaced.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101156
All fuchsia targets will now use the relative-vtables ABI by default.
Also remove -fexperimental-relative-c++-abi-vtables from test RUNs targeting fuchsia.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102374
At the moment, the matrix support in CheckCXXCStyleCast (added in
D101696) breaks function-style constructor calls that take a
single matrix value, because it is treated as matrix cast.
Instead, unify the C++ matrix cast handling by moving the logic to
TryStaticCast and only handle the case where both types are matrix
types. Otherwise, fall back to the generic mis-match detection.
Suggested by @rjmccall
Reviewed By: SaurabhJha
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103163
This relands commit 13dd65b3a1.
The original commit contained a test, which failed when compiled
for a MACH-O target.
This patch changes the test to run for x86_64-linux instead of
`%itanium_abi_triple`, to avoid having invalid syntax for MACH-O
sections. The patch itself does not care about section attribute
syntax and a x86 backend does not even need to be included in the
build.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102693
When a const-qualified object has a section attribute, that
section is set to read-only and clang outputs a LLVM IR constant
for that object. This is incorrect for dynamically initialised
objects.
For example:
int init() { return 15; }
__attribute__((section("SA")))
const int a = init();
a is allocated to a read-only section and is left
unintialised (zero-initialised).
This patch adds checks if an initialiser is a constant expression
and allocates objects to sections as follows:
* const-qualified objects
- no initialiser or constant initialiser: .rodata
- dynamic initializer: .bss
* non const-qualified objects
- no initialiser or dynamic initialiser: .bss
- constant initialiser: .data
(".rodata", ".data", and ".bss" names used just for explanatory
purpose)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102693
When -gstrict-dwarf is specified, generate DW_TAG_rvalue_reference_type
at DWARF 4 or above
Reviewed By: dblaikie, aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100630
.byte supports string, so if the whole byte list are printable,
we can actually print the string for readability and LIT tests maintainence.
.byte 'H,'e,'l,'l,'o,',,' ,'w,'o,'r,'l,'d
->
.byte "Hello, world"
Reviewed By: hubert.reinterpretcast
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102814
It turns out we have not correctly supported exception spec all along in
Emscripten EH. Emscripten EH supports `throw()` but not `throw` with
types. See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50396.
Wasm EH also only supports `throw()` but not `throw` with types, and we
have been printing a warning message for the latter. This prints the
same warning message for `throw` with types when Emscripten EH is used,
or more precisely, when Wasm EH is not used. (So this will print the
warning messsage even when `-fno-exceptions` is used but I think that
should be fine. It's cumbersome to do a complilcated option checking in
CGException.cpp and options checkings are mostly done in elsewhere.)
Reviewed By: dschuff, kripken
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102791
We use `CHECK-LABEL: define` to divide input stream into functions,
this works well on most platforms.
But there are cases that some platforms (eg: AIX) may have different
codegen , especially for global constructor and descructors.
On AIX, the codegen will have two more functions: __dtor_b,
__finalize_b, which will fail the test.
The fix is to use specific function name so that we can safely ignore
those unrelated codegen differences.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102654
I wouldn't recommend writing code like the testcase; a function
parameter isn't atomic, so using an atomic type doesn't really make
sense. But it's valid, so clang shouldn't crash on it.
The code was assuming hasAggregateEvaluationKind(Ty) implies Ty is a
RecordType, which isn't true. Just use isRecordType() instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102015
I've taken the following steps to add unwinding support from inline assembly:
1) Add a new `unwind` "attribute" (like `sideeffect`) to the asm syntax:
```
invoke void asm sideeffect unwind "call thrower", "~{dirflag},~{fpsr},~{flags}"()
to label %exit unwind label %uexit
```
2.) Add Bitcode writing/reading support + LLVM-IR parsing.
3.) Emit EHLabels around inline assembly lowering (SelectionDAGBuilder + GlobalISel) when `InlineAsm::canThrow` is enabled.
4.) Tweak InstCombineCalls/InlineFunction pass to not mark inline assembly "calls" as nounwind.
5.) Add clang support by introducing a new clobber: "unwind", which lower to the `canThrow` being enabled.
6.) Don't allow unwinding callbr.
Reviewed By: Amanieu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95745
The original change was reverted because it was discovered
that clang mishandles thunks, and they receive wrong
attributes for their this/return types - the ones for the function
they will call, not the ones they have.
While i have tried to fix this in https://reviews.llvm.org/D100388
that patch has been up and stuck for a month now,
with little signs of progress.
So while it will be good to solve this for real,
for now we can simply avoid introducing the bug,
by not annotating this/return for thunks.
This reverts commit 6270b3a1ea,
relanding 0aa0458f14.
As it was discovered in post-commit feedback
for 0aa0458f14,
we handle thunks incorrectly, and end up annotating
their this/return with attributes that are valid
for their callees, not for thunks themselves.
While it would be good to fix this properly,
and keep annotating them on thunks,
i've tried doing that in https://reviews.llvm.org/D100388
with little success, and the patch is stuck for a month now.
So for now, as a stopgap measure, subj.
Non-comprehensive list of cases:
* Dumping template arguments;
* Corresponding parameter contains a deduced type;
* Template arguments are for a DeclRefExpr that hadMultipleCandidates()
Type information is added in the form of prefixes (u8, u, U, L),
suffixes (U, L, UL, LL, ULL) or explicit casts to printed integral template
argument, if MSVC codeview mode is disabled.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77598
Commit 5baea05601 set the CurCodeDecl
because it was needed to pass the assert in CodeGenFunction::EmitLValueForLambdaField,
But this was not right to do as CodeGenFunction::FinishFunction passes it to EmitEndEHSpec
and cause corruption of the EHStack.
Revert the part of the commit that changes the CurCodeDecl, and instead
adjust the assert to check for a null CurCodeDecl.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102027
This implements the flag proposed in RFC
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2020-August/066437.html.
The goal is to add a way to override the default target C++ ABI through a
compiler flag. This makes it easier to test and transition between different
C++ ABIs through compile flags rather than build flags.
In this patch:
- Store -fc++-abi= in a LangOpt. This isn't stored in a CodeGenOpt because
there are instances outside of codegen where Clang needs to know what the
ABI is (particularly through ASTContext::createCXXABI), and we should be
able to override the target default if the flag is provided at that point.
- Expose the existing ABIs in TargetCXXABI as values that can be passed
through this flag.
- Create a .def file for these ABIs to make it easier to check flag values.
- Add an error for diagnosing bad ABI flag values.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85802
If a return value is explicitly rounded to 64 bits, an additional zext
instruction is emitted, and in some cases it prevents tail call
optimization.
As discussed in D100225, this rounding is not necessary and can be
disabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100591
The code example:
```
constexpr const char kEta[] = "Eta";
template <const char*, typename T> class Column {};
using quick = Column<kEta,double>;
void lookup() {
quick c1;
c1.ls();
}
```
emits error: no member named 'ls' in 'Column<&kEta, double>'. The patch fixes
the printed type name by not printing the ampersand for array types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36368
Currently Clang does not add mustprogress to inifinite loops with a
known constant condition, matching C11 behavior. The forward progress
guarantee in C++11 and later should allow us to add mustprogress to any
loop (http://eel.is/c++draft/intro.progress#1).
This allows us to simplify the code dealing with adding mustprogress a
bit.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96418
The NSS FileCheck variables at the end of the
CodeGenCXX/split-stacks.cpp clang testcase are off by 1, resulting in
the use of an undefined variable (NSS3). One of the CHECK-NOT is also
redundant because _Z8tnosplitIiEiv uses the same attribute as _Z3foov
without split stack. This commit fixes that.
Reviewed By: ChuanqiXu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99839
GCC 8 introduced these new pragmas to control loop unrolling. We should support them for compatibility reasons and the implementation itself requires few lines of code, since everything needed is already implemented for #pragma unroll/nounroll.
This is a Clang-only change and depends on the existing "musttail"
support already implemented in LLVM.
The [[clang::musttail]] attribute goes on a return statement, not
a function definition. There are several constraints that the user
must follow when using [[clang::musttail]], and these constraints
are verified by Sema.
Tail calls are supported on regular function calls, calls through a
function pointer, member function calls, and even pointer to member.
Future work would be to throw a warning if a users tries to pass
a pointer or reference to a local variable through a musttail call.
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99517
ICC permits this, and after some extensive testing it looks like we can
support this with very little trouble. We intentionally don't choose to
do this with attribute-target (despite it likely working as well!)
because GCC does not support that, and introducing said
incompatibility doesn't seem worth it.
The existing Windows Itanium patches for dllimport/export
behaviour w.r.t vtables/rtti can't be adopted for PS4 due to
backwards compatibility reasons (see comments on
https://reviews.llvm.org/D90299).
This commit adds our PS4 scheme for this to Clang.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93203
Summary: The tags DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_14 and DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_11, introduced in Dwarf-5, are unexpected in previous versions. Fixing the mismathing doesn't have any drawbacks for any other debuggers, but helps dbx.
Reviewed By: aprantl, shchenz
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99250
Nikita Popov