This change is intended as initial setup. The plan is to add
more semantic checks later. I plan to update the documentation
as more semantic checks are added (instead of documenting the
details up front). Most of the code closely mirrors that for
the Swift calling convention. Three places are marked as
[FIXME: swiftasynccc]; those will be addressed once the
corresponding convention is introduced in LLVM.
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95561
This reverts commit 52aeacfbf5.
There isn't full agreement on a path forward yet, but there is agreement that
this shouldn't land as-is. See discussion on https://reviews.llvm.org/D105338
Also reverts unreviewed "[clang] Improve `-Wnull-dereference` diag to be more in-line with reality"
This reverts commit f4877c78c0.
And all the related changes to tests:
This reverts commit 9a0152799f.
This reverts commit 3f7c9cc274.
This reverts commit 329f8197ef.
This reverts commit aa9f58cc2c.
This reverts commit 2df37d5ddd.
This reverts commit a72a441812.
When there is unknown type in a struct in code compiled with
-Wcast-align, the compiler crashes due to
clang::ASTContext::getASTRecordLayout() failing an assert.
Added check that the RecordDecl is valid before calling
getASTRecordLayout().
A user reported an issue to me via email that Clang was accepting some
code that GCC was rejecting. After investigation, it turned out to be a
general problem of us failing to properly reject attributes written in
the type position in C when they don't apply to types. The root cause
was a terminology issue -- we sometimes use "CXX11Attr" to mean [[]] in
C++11 mode and sometimes [[]] in general -- and this came back to bite
us because in this particular case, it really meant [[]] in C++ mode.
I fixed the issue by introducing a new function
AttributeCommonInfo::isStandardAttributeSyntax() to represent [[]] in
either C or C++ mode.
This fix pointed out that we've had the issue in some of our existing
tests, which have all been corrected. This resolves
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50954.
This patch adds a new clang builtin, __arithmetic_fence. The purpose of the
builtin is to provide the user fine control, at the expression level, over
floating point optimization when -ffast-math (-ffp-model=fast) is enabled.
The builtin prevents the optimizer from rearranging floating point expression
evaluation. The new option fprotect-parens has the same effect on
parenthesized expressions, forcing the optimizer to respect the parentheses.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, kpn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100118
This patch adds a new clang builtin, __arithmetic_fence. The purpose of the
builtin is to provide the user fine control, at the expression level, over
floating point optimization when -ffast-math (-ffp-model=fast) is enabled.
The builtin prevents the optimizer from rearranging floating point expression
evaluation. The new option fprotect-parens has the same effect on
parenthesized expressions, forcing the optimizer to respect the parentheses.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, kpn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100118
Word on the grapevine was that the committee had some discussion that
ended with unanimous agreement on eliminating relational function pointer comparisons.
We wanted to be bold and just ban all of them cold turkey.
But then we chickened out at the last second and are going for
eliminating just the spaceship overload candidate instead, for now.
See D104680 for reference.
This should be fine and "safe", because the only possible semantic change this
would cause is that overload resolution could possibly be ambiguous if
there was another viable candidate equally as good.
But to save face a little we are going to:
* Issue an "error" for three-way comparisons on function pointers.
But all this is doing really is changing one vague error message,
from an "invalid operands to binary expression" into an
"ordered comparison of function pointers", which sounds more like we mean business.
* Otherwise "warn" that comparing function pointers like that is totally
not cool (unless we are told to keep quiet about this).
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104892
According to https://eel.is/c++draft/over.literal
> double operator""_Bq(long double); // OK: does not use the reserved identifier _Bq ([lex.name])
> double operator"" _Bq(long double); // ill-formed, no diagnostic required: uses the reserved identifier _Bq ([lex.name])
Obey that rule by keeping track of the operator literal name status wrt. leading whitespace.
Fix: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50644
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104299
GCC has had this function attribute since GCC 7.1 for this purpose. I
added "no_profile" last week in D104475; rename this to
"no_profile_instrument_function" to improve compatibility with GCC.
Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80223#c11
Reviewed By: MaskRay, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104658
Fixed crash when doing pointer math on a void pointer.
Also, reworked test to use -verify rather than FileCheck.
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104424
Check applied to unbounded (incomplete) arrays and pointers to spot
cases where the computed address is beyond the largest possible
addressable extent of the array, based on the address space in which the
array is delcared, or which the pointer refers to.
Check helps to avoid cases of nonsense pointer math and array indexing
which could lead to linker failures or runtime exceptions. Of
particular interest when building for embedded systems with small
address spaces.
This is version 2 of this patch -- version 1 had some testing issues
due to a sign error in existing code. That error is corrected and
lit test for this chagne is extended to verify the fix.
Originally reviewed/accepted by: aaron.ballman
Original revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86796
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, ebevhan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88174
Check applied to unbounded (incomplete) arrays and pointers to spot
cases where the computed address is beyond the largest possible
addressable extent of the array, based on the address space in which the
array is delcared, or which the pointer refers to.
Check helps to avoid cases of nonsense pointer math and array indexing
which could lead to linker failures or runtime exceptions. Of
particular interest when building for embedded systems with small
address spaces.
This is version 2 of this patch -- version 1 had some testing issues
due to a sign error in existing code. That error is corrected and
lit test for this chagne is extended to verify the fix.
Originally reviewed/accepted by: aaron.ballman
Original revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86796
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, ebevhan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88174
This patch solves an error such as:
incompatible operand types ('vbool4_t' (aka '__rvv_bool4_t') and '__rvv_bool4_t')
when one of the value is a TypedefType of the other value in ?:.
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103603
This patch adds supports for inline assembly operands and some simple
operand constraints, including register and constant operands.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102585
Add front end diagnostics to report error for unimplemented TLS models set by
- compiler option `-ftls-model`
- attributes like `__thread int __attribute__((tls_model("local-exec"))) var_name;`
Reviewed by: aaron.ballman, nemanjai, PowerPC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102070
Summary:
Test and produce warning for subtracting a pointer from null or subtracting
null from a pointer. Reuse existing warning that this is undefined
behaviour. Also add unit test for both warnings.
Reformat to satisfy clang-format.
Respond to review comments: add additional test.
Respond to review comments: Do not issue warning for nullptr - nullptr
in C++.
Fix indenting to satisfy clang-format.
Respond to review comments: Add C++ tests.
Author: Jamie Schmeiser <schmeise@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed By: efriedma (Eli Friedman), nickdesaulniers (Nick Desaulniers)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98798
Warn when a declaration uses an identifier that doesn't obey the reserved
identifier rule from C and/or C++.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93095
These are intended to mimic warnings available in gcc.
-Wunused-but-set-variable is triggered in the case of a variable which
appears on the LHS of an assignment but not otherwise used.
For instance:
void f() {
int x;
x = 0;
}
-Wunused-but-set-parameter works similarly, but for function parameters
instead of variables.
In C++, they are triggered only for scalar types; otherwise, they are
triggered for all types. This is gcc's behavior.
-Wunused-but-set-parameter is controlled by -Wextra, while
-Wunused-but-set-variable is controlled by -Wunused. This is slightly
different from gcc's behavior, but seems most consistent with clang's
behavior for -Wunused-parameter and -Wunused-variable.
Reviewed By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100581
When an object is allocated in a non-default address space we do not
need to check for a constructor if it is not initialized and has a
trivial constructor (which we won't call then).
Reviewed By: JonChesterfield
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100929
This is a Clang-only change and depends on the existing "musttail"
support already implemented in LLVM.
The [[clang::musttail]] attribute goes on a return statement, not
a function definition. There are several constraints that the user
must follow when using [[clang::musttail]], and these constraints
are verified by Sema.
Tail calls are supported on regular function calls, calls through a
function pointer, member function calls, and even pointer to member.
Future work would be to throw a warning if a users tries to pass
a pointer or reference to a local variable through a musttail call.
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99517
Similar to variables with an initializer, this is never valid in
standard C, so we can safely constant-fold as an extension. I ran into
this construct in a couple proprietary codebases.
While I'm here, drive-by fix for 090dd647: we should only fold variables
with VLA types, not arbitrary variably modified types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98363
This change splits '-Wtautological-unsigned-zero-compare' by reporting
char-expressions-interpreted-as-unsigned under a separate diagnostic
'-Wtautological-unsigned-char-zero-compare'. This is beneficial for
projects that want to enable '-Wtautological-unsigned-zero-compare' but at
the same time want to keep code portable for platforms with char being
signed or unsigned, such as Chromium.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99808
These proposals make the same changes to both C++ and C and remove a
restriction on standard attributes appearing multiple times in the same
attribute list.
We could warn on the duplicate attributes, but do not. This is for
consistency as we do not warn on attributes duplicated within the
attribute specifier sequence. If we want to warn on duplicated
standard attributes, we should do so both for both situations:
[[foo, foo]] and [[foo]][[foo]].
Clang currently has a bug where it allows you to write [[foo bar]] and
both attributes are silently accepted. This patch corrects the comma
parsing rules for such attributes and handles the test case fallout, as
a few tests were accidentally doing this.
This implements C-style type conversions for matrix types, as specified
in clang/docs/MatrixTypes.rst.
Fixes PR47141.
Reviewed By: fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99037
I have been trying to statically find and analyze all calls to heap
allocation functions to determine how many of them use sizes known at
compile time vs only at runtime. While doing so I saw that quite a few
projects use replaceable function pointers for heap allocation and noticed
that clang was not able to annotate functions pointers with alloc_size.
I have changed the Sema checks to allow alloc_size on all function pointers
and typedefs for function pointers now and added checks that these
attributes are propagated to the LLVM IR correctly.
With this patch we can also compute __builtin_object_size() for calls to
allocation function pointers with the alloc_size attribute.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, erik.pilkington
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55212
Recently atomicrmw started to support fadd/fsub:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D53965
However clang atomic builtins fetch add/sub still does not support
emitting atomicrmw fadd/fsub.
This patch adds that.
Reviewed by: John McCall, Artem Belevich, Matt Arsenault, JF Bastien,
James Y Knight, Louis Dionne, Olivier Giroux
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71726
Currently, when one or more attributes are mutually exclusive, the
developer adding the attribute has to manually emit diagnostics. In
practice, this is highly error prone, especially for declaration
attributes, because such checking is not trivial. Redeclarations
require you to write a "merge" function to diagnose mutually exclusive
attributes and most attributes get this wrong.
This patch introduces a table-generated way to specify that a group of
two or more attributes are mutually exclusive:
def : MutualExclusions<[Attr1, Attr2, Attr3]>;
This works for both statement and declaration attributes (but not type
attributes) and the checking is done either from the common attribute
diagnostic checking code or from within mergeDeclAttribute() when
merging redeclarations.
```
Warn when a function pointer is cast to an incompatible function
pointer. In a cast involving function types with a variable argument
list only the types of initial arguments that are provided are
considered. Any parameter of pointer-type matches any other
pointer-type. Any benign differences in integral types are ignored, like
int vs. long on ILP32 targets. Likewise type qualifiers are ignored. The
function type void (*) (void) is special and matches everything, which
can be used to suppress this warning. In a cast involving pointer to
member types this warning warns whenever the type cast is changing the
pointer to member type. This warning is enabled by -Wextra.
```
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97831
Clang currently automates a fair amount of diagnostic checking for
declaration attributes based on the declarations in Attr.td. It checks
for things like subject appertainment, number of arguments, language
options, etc. This patch uses the same machinery to perform diagnostic
checking on statement attributes.
This would assert if we hit the evaluation step limit between starting
to delay the call and finishing. In any case, delaying the call was
largely pointless as it doesn't really matter when we mark the
evaluation as having had side effects.
Varun Gandhi