While we can debate on the value of passing by const value, there is no
arguing that it's confusing to do so in some circumstances, such as when
marking a pointer parameter as being const (did you mean a pointer-to-const?).
This commit fixes a few issues along those lines.
This is a fairly mechanical change, it just moves each algorithm into
its own header. This is intended to be a NFC.
This commit re-applies 7ed7d4ccb8, which was reverted in 692d7166f7
because the Modules build got broken. The modules build has now been
fixed, so we're re-committing this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103583
Attribution note
----------------
I'm only committing this. This commit is a mix of D103583, D103330 and
D104171 authored by:
Co-authored-by: Christopher Di Bella <cjdb@google.com>
Co-authored-by: zoecarver <z.zoelec2@gmail.com>
P1518 does the following in C++23 but we'll just do it in C++17 as well:
- Stop requiring `Alloc` to be an allocator on some container-adaptor deduction guides
- Stop deducing from `Allocator` on some sequence container constructors
- Stop deducing from `Allocator` on some other container constructors (libc++ already did this)
The affected constructors are the "allocator-extended" versions of
constructors where the non-allocator arguments are already sufficient
to deduce the allocator type. For example,
std::pmr::vector<int> v1;
std::vector v2(v1, std::pmr::new_delete_resource());
std::stack s2(v1, std::pmr::new_delete_resource());
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97742
This is a fairly mechanical change, it just moves each algorithm into its own header. This is a NFC.
Note: during this change, I burned down all the includes, so this follows "include only and exactly what you use."
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103583
* adds `sized_range` and conformance tests
* moves `disable_sized_range` into namespace `std::ranges`
* removes explicit type parameter
Implements part of P0896 'The One Ranges Proposal'.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102434
And remove the dedicated debug-iterator tests; we want to test this in all modes.
We have a CI step for testing the whole test suite with `--debug_level=1` now.
Part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D102003
And remove the dedicated debug-iterator test; we want to test this in all modes.
We have a CI step for testing the whole test suite with `--debug_level=1` now.
Part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D102003
This simply applies Howard's commit 4c80bfbd53 consistently
across all the associative and unordered container tests.
"unord.set/insert_hint_const_lvalue.pass.cpp" failed with `-D_LIBCPP_DEBUG=1`
before this patch; it was the only one that incorrectly reused
invalid iterator `e`. The others already used valid iterators
(generally `c.end()`); I'm just making them all match the same pattern
of usage: "e, then r, then c.end() for the rest."
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101679
C++20 revised the definition of what it means to be an iterator. While
all _Cpp17InputIterators_ satisfy `std::input_iterator`, the reverse
isn't true. D100271 introduces a new test adaptor to accommodate this
new definition (`cpp20_input_iterator`).
In order to help readers immediately distinguish which input iterator
adaptor is _Cpp17InputIterator_, the current `input_iterator` adaptor
has been prefixed with `cpp17_`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101242
This reverts a224bf8ec4 and fixes the
underlying issue.
The underlying issue is simply that MSVC headers contains a define
like "#define __in", where __in is one macro in the MSVC Source
Code Annotation Language, defined in sal.h
Just use a different variable name than "__in"
__indirectly_readable_impl, and add "__in" to nasty_macros.h just
like the existing __out. (Also adding a couple more potentially
conflicting ones.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101613
A span has no idea what container (if any) "owns" its iterators, nor
under what circumstances they might become invalidated.
However, continue to use `__wrap_iter<T*>` instead of raw `T*` outside
of debug mode, because we've been shipping `std::span` since Clang 7
and ldionne doesn't want to break ABI. (Namely, the mangling of functions
taking `span::iterator` as a parameter.) Permit using raw `T*` there,
but only under an ABI macro: `_LIBCPP_ABI_SPAN_POINTER_ITERATORS`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101003
To run llvm-lit manually from the command line:
./bin/llvm-lit -sv --param std=c++2b --param cxx_under_test=`pwd`/bin/clang \
--param debug_level=1 ../libcxx/test/
Tests that currently fail with `debug_level=1` are marked `LIBCXX-DEBUG-FIXME`,
but my intent is to deal with all of them and leave no such annotations in
the codebase within the next couple weeks. (I have patches for all of them
in my local checkout.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100866
* `std::ranges::range`
* `std::ranges::sentinel_t`
* `std::ranges::range_difference_t`
* `std::ranges::range_value_t`
* `std::ranges::range_reference_t`
* `std::ranges::range_rvalue_reference_t`
* `std::ranges::common_range`
`range_size_t` depends on `sized_range` and will be added alongside it.
Implements parts of:
* P0896R4 The One Ranges Proposal`
Depends on D100255.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100269
In particular, `span<int>::iterator` may be a raw pointer type
and thus have no nested typedef `iterator::value_type`. However,
we already know that the value_type we expect for `span<int>` is just `int`.
Fix up all other iterator_concept_conformance tests in the same way.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101420
Implements parts of:
* P0896R4 The One Ranges Proposal`
Depends on D100073.
Reviewed By: ldionne, zoecarver, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100080
That was originally committed in 04733181b5 and then reverted in
a9f11cc0d9 because it broke several people.
The problem was a missing include of __iterator/concepts.h, which has now
been fixed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100073
Implements parts of:
* P0896R4 The One Ranges Proposal`
Depends on D99873.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100073
This is the initial patch to implement ranges in libc++.
Implements parts of:
- P0896R4 One Ranges Proposal
- P1870 forwarding-range is too subtle
- LWG3379 in several library names is misleading
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, cjdb, zoecarver, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90999
In addition to making the code a lot easier to grasp by localizing many
helper functions to the only file where they are actually needed, this
will allow creating helper functions that depend on allocator_traits
outside of <memory>.
This is done as part of implementing array support in allocate_shared,
which requires non-trivial array initialization algorithms that would be
better to keep out of <memory> for sanity. It's also a first step towards
splitting up our monolithic headers into finer grained ones, which will
make it easier to reuse functionality across the library. For example,
it's just weird that we had to define `addressof` inside <type_traits>
to avoid circular dependencies -- instead it's better to implement those
in true helper headers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93074
- Several -Wshadow warnings
- Several places where we did not initialize our base class explicitly
- Unused variable warnings
- Some tautological comparisons
- Some places where we'd pass null arguments to functions expecting
non-null (in unevaluated contexts)
- Add a few pragmas to turn off spurious warnings
- Fix warnings about declarations that don't declare anything
- Properly disable deprecation warnings in ext/ tests (the pragmas we
were using didn't work on GCC)
- Disable include_as_c.sh.cpp because GCC complains about C++ flags
when compiling as C. I couldn't find a way to fix this one properly,
so I'm disabling the test. This isn't great, but at least we'll be
able to enable warnings in the whole test suite with GCC.
zoecarver