The unit tests test some implementation details. As @Quuxplusone pointed
out in D96664 this should only be tested when the tests use libc++. This
addresses the issue for code already in main.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105568
Now that Lit supports regular expressions inside XFAIL & friends, it is
much easier to write Lit annotations based on the triple.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104747
Moves:
* `std::move`, `std::forward`, `std::declval`, and `std::swap` into
`__utility/${FUNCTION_NAME}`.
* `std::swap_ranges` and `std::iter_swap` into
`__algorithm/${FUNCTION_NAME}`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103734
C++03 didn't support `explicit` conversion operators;
but Clang's C++03 mode does, as an extension, so we can use it.
This lets us make the conversion explicit in `std::function` (even in '03),
and remove some silly metaprogramming in `std::basic_ios`.
Drive-by improvements to the tests for these operators, in addition
to making sure all these tests also run in `c++03` mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104682
While the std::allocator<void> specialization was deprecated by
https://wg21.link/p0174#2.2, the *use* of std::allocator<void> by users
was not. The intent was that std::allocator<void> could still be used
in C++17 and C++20, but starting with C++20 (with the removal of the
specialization), std::allocator<void> would use the primary template.
That intent was called out in wg21.link/p0619r4#3.9.
As a result of this patch, _LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX20_REMOVED_ALLOCATOR_MEMBERS
will also not control whether the explicit specialization is provided or
not. It shouldn't matter, since in C++20, one can simply use the primary
template.
Fixes http://llvm.org/PR50299
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104323
This has been broken out of D104170 since it should be merged whether or
not we go ahead with the module map changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104175
Makes the following operations constexpr:
* `std::swap(optional, optional)`
* `optional(optional<U> const&)`
* `optional(optional<U>&&)`
* `~optional()`
* `operator=(nullopt_t)`
* `operator=(U&&)`
* `operator=(optional<U> const&)`
* `operator=(optional<U>&&)`
* `emplace(Args&&...)`
* `emplace(initializer_list<U>, Args&&...)`
* `swap(optional&)`
* `reset()`
P2231 has been accepted by plenary, with the committee recommending
implementers retroactively apply to C++20. It's necessary for us to
implement _`semiregular-box`_ and _`non-propagating-cache`_, both of
which are required for ranges (otherwise we'll need to reimplement
`std::optional` with these members `constexpr`ified).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102119
The post-conditions for the self move assignment of `std::unique_ptr`
were changed. This requires no implementation changes. A test was added
to validate the new post-conditions.
Addresses
- LWG-3455: Incorrect Postconditions on `unique_ptr` move assignment
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103764
This define was out of sync with the corresponding define in tests, it
was added inconsistently in 171c77b7da.
Modern MSVC environments do have these typedefs and functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103398
Make sure we provide the correct It::difference_type member and update
the tests and synopses to be accurate.
Supersedes D102657 and D103101 (thanks to the original authors).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103273
Due to issues with the detection of the clang-verify feature, these
tests have been skipped in the Windows CI configuration so far.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103308
C++17 deprecated std::iterator and removed it as a base class for all
iterator adaptors. We implement that change, but we still provide a way
to inherit from std::iterator in the few cases where doing otherwise
would be an ABI break.
Supersedes D101729 and the std::iterator base parts of D103101 and D102657.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103171
This also provides some of the scaffolding needed by D102992 and D101729, and mops up after D101730 etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103055
C++17 deprecates `std::raw_storage_iterator` and C++20 removes it.
Implements part of:
* P0174R2 'Deprecating Vestigial Library Parts in C++17'
* P0619R4 'Reviewing Deprecated Facilities of C++17 for C++20'
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101730
This fixes a long standing issue where the triple is not always set
consistently in all configurations. This change also moves the
back-deployment Lit features to using the proper target triple
instead of using something ad-hoc.
This will be necessary for using from scratch Lit configuration files
in both normal testing and back-deployment testing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102012
This is a rough reapplication of the change that fixed std::to_address
to avoid relying on element_type (da456167). It is somewhat different
because the fix to avoid breaking Clang (which caused it to be reverted
in 347f69c55) was a bit more involved.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101638
This reverts commit da456167, which broke the Clang build. I'm able to
reproduce it but I want to give myself a bit more time to investigate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101638
In std::tuple, we should try to avoid calling std::is_copy_constructible
whenever we can to avoid surprising interactions with (I believe) compiler
builtins. This bug was reported in https://reviews.llvm.org/D96523#2730953.
The issue was that when tuple<_Up...> was the same as tuple<_Tp...>, we
would short-circuit the _Or (because sizeof...(_Tp) != 1) and go evaluate
the following `is_constructible<_Tp, const _Up&>...`. That shouldn't
actually be a problem, but see the analysis in https://reviews.llvm.org/D101770#2736470
for why it is with Clang and GCC.
Instead, after this patch, we check whether the constructed-from tuple
is the same as the current tuple regardless of the number of elements,
since we should always prefer the normal copy constructor in that case
anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101770
This fixes the issue by implementing _And using the short-circuiting
SFINAE trick that we previously used only in std::tuple. One thing we
could look into is use the naive recursive implementation for disjunctions
with a small number of arguments, and use that trick with larger numbers
of arguments. It might be the case that the constant overhead for setting
up the SFINAE trick makes it only worth doing for larger packs, but that's
left for further work.
This problem was raised in https://reviews.llvm.org/D96523.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101661
This patch gets rid of technical debt around std::pointer_safety which,
I claim, is entirely unnecessary. I don't think anybody has used
std::pointer_safety in actual code because we do not implement the
underlying garbage collection support. In fact, P2186 even proposes
removing these facilities entirely from a future C++ version. As such,
I think it's entirely fine to get rid of complex workarounds whose goals
were to avoid breaking the ABI back in 2017.
I'm putting this up both to get reviews and to discuss this proposal for
a breaking change. I think we should be comfortable with making these
tiny breaks if we are confident they won't hurt anyone, which I'm fairly
confident is the case here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100410
C++20 revised the definition of what it means to be an iterator. While
all _Cpp17InputIterators_ satisfy `std::input_iterator`, the reverse
isn't true. D100271 introduces a new test adaptor to accommodate this
new definition (`cpp20_input_iterator`).
In order to help readers immediately distinguish which input iterator
adaptor is _Cpp17InputIterator_, the current `input_iterator` adaptor
has been prefixed with `cpp17_`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101242
This reverts a224bf8ec4 and fixes the
underlying issue.
The underlying issue is simply that MSVC headers contains a define
like "#define __in", where __in is one macro in the MSVC Source
Code Annotation Language, defined in sal.h
Just use a different variable name than "__in"
__indirectly_readable_impl, and add "__in" to nasty_macros.h just
like the existing __out. (Also adding a couple more potentially
conflicting ones.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101613
Implements parts of:
* P0896R4 The One Ranges Proposal`
Depends on D100073.
Reviewed By: ldionne, zoecarver, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100080
This nasty patch rewrites the tuple constructors to match those defined
by the Standard. We were previously providing several extensions in those
constructors - those extensions are removed by this patch.
The issue with those extensions is that we've had numerous bugs filed
against us over the years for problems essentially caused by them. As a
result, people are unable to use tuple in ways that are blessed by the
Standard, all that for the perceived benefit of providing them extensions
that they never asked for.
Since this is an API break, I communicated it in the release notes.
I do not foresee major issues with this break because I don't think the
extensions are too widely relied upon, but we can ship it and see if we
get complaints before the next LLVM release - that will give us some
amount of information regarding how much use these extensions have.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96523
That was originally committed in 04733181b5 and then reverted in
a9f11cc0d9 because it broke several people.
The problem was a missing include of __iterator/concepts.h, which has now
been fixed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100073
Implements parts of:
* P0896R4 The One Ranges Proposal`
Depends on D99873.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100073
This patch fixes LWG2874. It is based on the original patch by Zoe Carver
originally uploaded at D81417.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81417
Some of Microsoft's unit tests in D70631 fail because libc++'s
implementation of std::chars_format isn't a proper bitmask type. Adding
the required functions to make std::chars_format a proper bitmask type.
Implements parts of P0067: Elementary string conversions
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97115
Mark de Wever