This can be seen as a follow up to commit 0ee439b705,
that changed the second argument of __powidf2, __powisf2 and
__powitf2 in compiler-rt from si_int to int. That was to align with
how those runtimes are defined in libgcc.
One thing that seem to have been missing in that patch was to make
sure that the rest of LLVM also handle that the argument now depends
on the size of int (not using the si_int machine mode for 32-bit).
When using __builtin_powi for a target with 16-bit int clang crashed.
And when emitting libcalls to those rtlib functions, typically when
lowering @llvm.powi), the backend would always prepare the exponent
argument as an i32 which caused miscompiles when the rtlib was
compiled with 16-bit int.
The solution used here is to use an overloaded type for the second
argument in @llvm.powi. This way clang can use the "correct" type
when lowering __builtin_powi, and then later when emitting the libcall
it is assumed that the type used in @llvm.powi matches the rtlib
function.
One thing that needed some extra attention was that when vectorizing
calls several passes did not support that several arguments could
be overloaded in the intrinsics. This patch allows overload of a
scalar operand by adding hasVectorInstrinsicOverloadedScalarOpd, with
an entry for powi.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99439
As far as I know 32 bits arguments and returns on RV64 are always
sign extended to i64. So I think we should be taking this into
account around libcalls.
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95285
Regenerated using:
./llvm/utils/update_llc_test_checks.py -u llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/*.ll
This has added comments to spill-related instructions and added @plt to
some symbols.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92841
With new test file this time.
Original message
This new test covers both with and without the F extension enabled.
This shows that the fptosi/fptoui for double->i32 use a different
libcall depending on whether the F extension is enabled. If it's
not enabled we use the 'si' library call. If it is enabled we use 'di'.
This new test covers both with and without the F extension enabled.
This shows that the fptosi/fptoui for double->i32 use a different
libcall depending on whether the F extension is enabled. If it's
not enabled we use the 'si' library call. If it is enabled we use 'di'.
Since i32 is not legal in riscv64,
it always promoted to i64 before emitting lib call and
for conversions like float/double to int and float/double to unsigned int
wrong lib call was emitted. This commit fix it using custom lowering.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80526
The patch fixed the issue that RV64 didn't clear the upper bits
when return complex floating value with lp64 ABI.
float _Complex
complex_add(float _Complex a, float _Complex b)
{
return a + b;
}
RealResult = zero_extend(RealA + RealB)
ImageResult = ImageA + ImageB
Return (RealResult | (ImageResult << 32))
The patch introduces shouldExtendTypeInLibCall target hook to suppress
the AssertZext generation when lowering floating LibCall.
Thanks to Eli's comments from the Bugzilla
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42820
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65497
llvm-svn: 370275
Bjorn Pettersson