LLVM test Transforms/HardwareLoops/ARM/structure.ll tries to check for
the absence of a sequence of instructions with several CHECK-NOT with
one of those directives using a variable defined in another. However
CHECK-NOT are checked independently so that is using a variable defined
in a pattern that should not occur in the input.
This commit only checks for the absence of llvm.loop.decrement.i32 which
rules out the presence of the whole sequence and does not involve an
undefined variable.
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99591
Recently we improved the lowering of low overhead loops and tail
predicated loops, but concentrated first on the DLS do style loops. This
extends those improvements over to the WLS while loops, improving the
chance of lowering them successfully. To do this the lowering has to
change a little as the instructions are terminators that produce a value
- something that needs to be treated carefully.
Lowering starts at the Hardware Loop pass, inserting a new
llvm.test.start.loop.iterations that produces both an i1 to control the
loop entry and an i32 similar to the llvm.start.loop.iterations
intrinsic added for do loops. This feeds into the loop phi, properly
gluing the values together:
%wls = call { i32, i1 } @llvm.test.start.loop.iterations.i32(i32 %div)
%wls0 = extractvalue { i32, i1 } %wls, 0
%wls1 = extractvalue { i32, i1 } %wls, 1
br i1 %wls1, label %loop.ph, label %loop.exit
...
loop:
%lsr.iv = phi i32 [ %wls0, %loop.ph ], [ %iv.next, %loop ]
..
%iv.next = call i32 @llvm.loop.decrement.reg.i32(i32 %lsr.iv, i32 1)
%cmp = icmp ne i32 %iv.next, 0
br i1 %cmp, label %loop, label %loop.exit
The llvm.test.start.loop.iterations need to be lowered through ISel
lowering as a pair of WLS and WLSSETUP nodes, which each get converted
to t2WhileLoopSetup and t2WhileLoopStart Pseudos. This helps prevent
t2WhileLoopStart from being a terminator that produces a value,
something difficult to control at that stage in the pipeline. Instead
the t2WhileLoopSetup produces the value of LR (essentially acting as a
lr = subs rn, 0), t2WhileLoopStart consumes that lr value (the Bcc).
These are then converted into a single t2WhileLoopStartLR at the same
point as t2DoLoopStartTP and t2LoopEndDec. Otherwise we revert the loop
to prevent them from progressing further in the pipeline. The
t2WhileLoopStartLR is a single instruction that takes a GPR and produces
LR, similar to the WLS instruction.
%1:gprlr = t2WhileLoopStartLR %0:rgpr, %bb.3
t2B %bb.1
...
bb.2.loop:
%2:gprlr = PHI %1:gprlr, %bb.1, %3:gprlr, %bb.2
...
%3:gprlr = t2LoopEndDec %2:gprlr, %bb.2
t2B %bb.3
The t2WhileLoopStartLR can then be treated similar to the other low
overhead loop pseudos, eventually being lowered to a WLS providing the
branches are within range.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97729
A DLS lr, lr instruction only moves lr to itself. It need not be emitted
on it's own to save a instruction in the loop preheader.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78916
We now have a lot of llc tests for hardware loops in CodeGen, which test
a larger variety of loops and are easier to maintain. This removes the
llc from mixed llc/opt tests.
This hints the operand of a t2DoLoopStart towards using LR, which can
help make it more likely to become t2DLS lr, lr. This makes it easier to
move if needed (as the input is the same as the output), or potentially
remove entirely.
The hint is added after others (from COPY's etc) which still take
precedence. It needed to find a place to add the hint, which currently
uses the post isel custom inserter.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89883
This changes the definition of t2DoLoopStart from
t2DoLoopStart rGPR
to
GPRlr = t2DoLoopStart rGPR
This will hopefully mean that low overhead loops are more tied together,
and we can more reliably generate loops without reverting or being at
the whims of the register allocator.
This is a fairly simple change in itself, but leads to a number of other
required alterations.
- The hardware loop pass, if UsePhi is set, now generates loops of the
form:
%start = llvm.start.loop.iterations(%N)
loop:
%p = phi [%start], [%dec]
%dec = llvm.loop.decrement.reg(%p, 1)
%c = icmp ne %dec, 0
br %c, loop, exit
- For this a new llvm.start.loop.iterations intrinsic was added, identical
to llvm.set.loop.iterations but produces a value as seen above, gluing
the loop together more through def-use chains.
- This new instrinsic conceptually produces the same output as input,
which is taught to SCEV so that the checks in MVETailPredication are not
affected.
- Some minor changes are needed to the ARMLowOverheadLoop pass, but it has
been left mostly as before. We should now more reliably be able to tell
that the t2DoLoopStart is correct without having to prove it, but
t2WhileLoopStart and tail-predicated loops will remain the same.
- And all the tests have been updated. There are a lot of them!
This patch on it's own might cause more trouble that it helps, with more
tail-predicated loops being reverted, but some additional patches can
hopefully improve upon that to get to something that is better overall.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89881
This is split off from D80316, slightly tightening the definition of overloaded
hardwareloop intrinsic llvm.loop.decrement.reg specifying that both operands
its result have the same type.
With a few things fixed:
- initialisaiton of the optimisation remark pass (this was causing the buildbot
failures on PPC),
- a test case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69660
This adds the initial plumbing to support optimisation remarks in
the IR hardware-loop pass.
I have left a todo in a comment where we can improve the reporting,
and will iterate on that now that we have this initial support in.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68579
llvm-svn: 374980
The code is now in a good enough state to pass the bunch of tests that
I have run (after fixing the bugs), so let's enable it by default.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65277
llvm-svn: 367297
Backend changes to enable WLS/LE low-overhead loops for armv8.1-m:
1) Use TTI to communicate to the HardwareLoop pass that we should try
to generate intrinsics that guard the loop entry, as well as setting
the loop trip count.
2) Lower the BRCOND that uses said intrinsic to an Arm specific node:
ARMWLS.
3) ISelDAGToDAG the node to a new pseudo instruction:
t2WhileLoopStart.
4) Add support in ArmLowOverheadLoops to handle the new pseudo
instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63816
llvm-svn: 364733
Introduce three pseudo instructions to be used during DAG ISel to
represent v8.1-m low-overhead loops. One maps to set_loop_iterations
while loop_decrement_reg is lowered to two, so that we can separate
the decrement and branching operations. The pseudo instructions are
expanded pre-emission, where we can still decide whether we actually
want to generate a low-overhead loop, in a new pass:
ARMLowOverheadLoops. The pass currently bails, reverting to an sub,
icmp and br, in the cases where a call or stack spill/restore happens
between the decrement and branching instructions, or if the loop is
too large.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63476
llvm-svn: 364288
The HardwareLoops pass finds exit blocks with a scevable exit count.
If the target specifies to update the loop counter in a register,
through a phi, we need to ensure that the exit block is a latch so
that we can insert the phi with the correct value for the incoming
edge.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63336
llvm-svn: 363556
TTI should report that it's not profitable to generate a hardware loop
if it, or one of its child loops, has already been converted.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63212
llvm-svn: 363234
Implement the backend target hook to drive the HardwareLoops pass.
The low-overhead branch extension for Arm M-class cores is flexible
enough that we don't have to ensure correctness at this point, except
checking that the loop counter variable can be stored in LR - a
32-bit register. For it to be profitable, we want to avoid loops that
contain function calls, or any other instruction that alters the PC.
This implementation uses TargetLoweringInfo, to query type and
operation actions, looks at intrinsic calls and also performs some
manual checks for remainder/division and FP operations.
I think this should be a good base to start and extra details can be
filled out later.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62907
llvm-svn: 363149
Thomas Preud'homme