There was an alias between 'simplifycfg' and 'simplify-cfg' in the
PassRegistry. That was the original reason for this patch, which
effectively removes the alias.
This patch also replaces all occurrances of 'simplify-cfg'
by 'simplifycfg'. Reason for choosing that form for the name is
that it matches the DEBUG_TYPE for the pass, and the legacy PM name
and also how it is spelled out in other passes such as
'loop-simplifycfg', and in other options such as
'simplifycfg-merge-cond-stores'.
I for some reason the name should be changed to 'simplify-cfg' in
the future, then I think such a renaming should be more widely done
and not only impacting the PassRegistry.
Reviewed By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105627
This patch adds an optional PriorityInlineOrder, which uses the heap to order inlining.
The callsite which size is smaller would have a higher priority.
Reviewed By: mtrofin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104028
alloca-dbgdeclare-merge.ll:
alloca-merge-align.ll:
array_merge.ll:
NPM inliner does not merge allocas
delete-call.ll:
NPM inliner does not delete readonly calls
externally_available.ll:
NPM inliner does not delete available_externally functions
inline-cold-callee.ll:
inline-hot-callee.ll:
inline-hot-callee.ll has a comment saying it only applies to legacy PM,
I assume same for inline-cold-callee.ll
devirtualize-2.ll:
inline-hot-callsite:
monster_scc.ll:
pr22285.ll:
already has legacy and new PM RUN lines
inline-cold.ll:
profile-summary required to see callee as cold
prof-update-sample.ll:
profile-summary required to update branch_weights
Reviewed By: davidxl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89093
Summary:
This change introduces InliningAdvisor (and related APIs), the interface
that abstracts decision making away from the inlining pass. We will use
this interface to delegate decision making to a trained ML model,
subsequently (see referenced RFC).
RFC: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-April/140763.html
Reviewers: davidxl, eraman, dblaikie
Subscribers: mgorny, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79042
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).
This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.
llvm-svn: 358546
in the same round of SCC update.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/rL309784, inline history is added to prevent
infinite inlining across multiple run of inliner and SCC update, but the
history will only be kept when new SCC is actually generated during SCC update.
We found a case that SCC can be split and then merge into itself in the same
round of SCC update, so the same SCC will be pop out from UR.CWorklist and
then added back immediately, without any new SCC generated, that is why the
existing patch cannot catch the infinite inline case.
What the patch does is even if no new SCC is generated, if only the current
SCC appears in UR.CWorklist again, then keep the inline history.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52915
llvm-svn: 345103
in r297374.
I've extracted a small version of this from the C++ metaprogram Richard
came up with to exercise these kinds of issues and written comments to
describe both how to reproduce a fresh version of the test case and what
likely failure modes are.
The test case is still a bit brittle as it depends on the particular
inline cost modeling and SCC visitation order, but it definitely would
have caught the bug right away when developing things so it seems
a really valuable test case to have.
llvm-svn: 297935
Bjorn Pettersson