Commit Graph

6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Simon Pilgrim d2f8961b7b [MemCpyOpt] Remove unused check-prefixes
Just use default CHECK
2020-11-09 12:18:20 +00:00
Nikita Popov cd6f40f432 [MemCpyOpt] Add test scaffolding for MSSA based MemCpyOpt
This adds an -enable-memcpyopt-memoryssa option that currently does
nothing apart from requiring MSSA as a dependency. The tests are
split to run both with the option disabled and enabled. I went with
this rather than the separate directory DSE uses, as I found it
convenient to have a direct side-by-side comparison of differences.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89206
2020-10-13 21:45:05 +02:00
Nikita Popov 64c54c5459 [MemCpyOpt] Regnerate test checks (NFC) 2020-10-02 18:42:13 +02:00
Eric Christopher cee313d288 Revert "Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass.""
The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory.

Will be re-reverting again.

llvm-svn: 358552
2019-04-17 04:52:47 +00:00
Eric Christopher a863435128 Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass."
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).

This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.

llvm-svn: 358546
2019-04-17 02:12:23 +00:00
Bjorn Pettersson 8e484dc531 [MemCpyOpt] Skip optimizing basic blocks not reachable from entry
Summary:
Skip basic blocks not reachable from the entry node
in MemCpyOptPass::iterateOnFunction.

Code that is unreachable may have properties that do not exist
for reachable code (an instruction in a basic block can for
example be dominated by a later instruction in the same basic
block, for example if there is a single block loop).
MemCpyOptPass::processStore is only safe to use for reachable
basic blocks, since it may iterate past the basic block
beginning when used for unreachable blocks. By simply skipping
to optimize unreachable basic blocks we can avoid asserts such
as "Assertion `!NodePtr->isKnownSentinel()' failed."
in MemCpyOptPass::processStore.

The problem was detected by fuzz tests.

Reviewers: eli.friedman, dneilson, efriedma

Reviewed By: efriedma

Subscribers: efriedma, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45889

llvm-svn: 330635
2018-04-23 19:55:04 +00:00