Commit Graph

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Mircea Trofin 5fe10263ab [llvm][inliner] Reuse the inliner pass to implement 'always inliner'
Enable performing mandatory inlinings upfront, by reusing the same logic
as the full inliner, instead of the AlwaysInliner. This has the
following benefits:
- reduce code duplication - one inliner codebase
- open the opportunity to help the full inliner by performing additional
function passes after the mandatory inlinings, but before th full
inliner. Performing the mandatory inlinings first simplifies the problem
the full inliner needs to solve: less call sites, more contextualization, and,
depending on the additional function optimization passes run between the
2 inliners, higher accuracy of cost models / decision policies.

Note that this patch does not yet enable much in terms of post-always
inline function optimization.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91567
2020-11-30 12:03:39 -08:00
Wenlei He 7c8a6936bf [Remarks] Add callsite locations to inline remarks
Summary:
Add call site location info into inline remarks so we can differentiate inline sites.
This can be useful for inliner tuning. We can also reconstruct full hierarchical inline
tree from parsing such remarks. The messege of inline remark is also tweaked so we can
differentiate SampleProfileLoader inline from CGSCC inline.

Reviewers: wmi, davidxl, hoy

Subscribers: hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits

Tags: #clang, #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82213
2020-06-20 23:32:10 -07:00
Leonard Chan e6d2c8dde6 [clang][NewPM] Fixing remaining -O0 tests that are broken under new PM
- CodeGen/flatten.c will fail under new PM becausec the new PM AlwaysInliner
  seems to intentionally inline functions but not call sites marked with
  alwaysinline (D23299)
- Tests that check remarks happen to check them for the inliner which is not
  turned on at O0. These tests just check that remarks work, but we can make
  separate tests for the new PM with -O1 so we can turn on the inliner and
  check the remarks with minimal changes.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62225

llvm-svn: 363846
2019-06-19 17:41:30 +00:00