This patch adds two IR intrinsics for vsetvli instruction. One to set the vector length to a user specified value and one to set it to vlmax. The vlmax uses the X0 source register encoding.
Clang builtins will follow in a separate patch
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92973
This moves the vtype decoding and printing to RISCVBaseInfo. This keeps all of
the decoding code in the same area as the encoding code. This will make it
easier to change the decoding for the 1.0 spec in the future.
We're now sharing the printing with the debug output for operands in the
assembler. This also fixes that debug output to include the tail and mask
agnostic bits. Since the printing code works on the vtype immediate value, we
now encode the immediate during parsing and store just the immediate in the
operand.
The companion RFC (http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-October/145850.html) gives lots of details on the overall strategy, but we summarize it here:
LLVM IR involving vector types is going to be selected using pseudo instructions (only MachineInstr). These pseudo instructions contain dummy operands to represent the vector type being operated and the vector length for the operation.
These two dummy operands, as set by instruction selection, will be used by the custom inserter to prepend every operation with an appropriate vsetvli instruction that ensures the vector architecture is properly configured for the operation. Not in this patch: later passes will remove the redundant vsetvli instructions.
Register classes of tuples of vector registers are used to represent vector register groups (LMUL > 1).
Those pseudos are eventually lowered into the actual instructions when emitting the MCInsts.
About the patch:
Because there is a bit of initial infrastructure required, this is the minimal patch that allows us to select instructions for 3 LLVM IR instructions: load, add and store vectors of integers. LLVM IR operations have "whole-vector" semantics (as in they generate values for all the elements).
Later patches will extend the information represented in TableGen.
Authored-by: Roger Ferrer Ibanez <rofirrim@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-by: Evandro Menezes <evandro.menezes@sifive.com>
Co-Authored-by: Craig Topper <craig.topper@sifive.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89449
This reverts 781917254d and recommits
781917254d.
I've changed getRegForInlineAsmConstraint to not use a std::pair
of Register in a previous commit. Hopefully that fixes the reported
issue with expensive checks on Windows. I'm still not sure exactly
why this commit removing an include affected a different file.
Original message:
RISCVRegisterInfo.h is part of the CodeGen layer. The Utils library
is intended to be shared with the MC layer so shouldn't use files
from the CodeGen layer.
The register enum names are already available from
RISCVMCTargetDesc.h. It appears what was coming from this include
was a transitive include of the Register class which I've replaced
with MCRegister. Register has a constructor from MCRegister so it
should be convertible.
RISCVRegisterInfo.h is part of the CodeGen layer. The Utils library
is intended to be shared with the MC layer so shouldn't use files
from the CodeGen layer.
The register enum names are already available from
RISCVMCTargetDesc.h. It appears what was coming from this include
was a transitive include of the Register class which I've replaced
with MCRegister. Register has a constructor from MCRegister so it
should be convertible.
Currenlty assume x18 is used as pointer to shadow call stack. User shall pass
flags:
"-fsanitize=shadow-call-stack -ffixed-x18"
Runtime supported is needed to setup x18.
If SCS is desired, all parts of the program should be built with -ffixed-x18 to
maintain inter-operatability.
There's no particuluar reason that we must use x18 as SCS pointer. Any register
may be used, as long as it does not have designated purpose already, like RA or
passing call arguments.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84414
1. if users don't specific -mattr, the default target-feature come
from IR attribute.
2. fixed bug and re-land this patch
Reviewers: lenary, asb
Reviewed By: lenary
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70837
if users don't specific -mattr, the default target-feature come
from IR attribute.
Reviewers: lenary, asb
Reviewed By: lenary, asb
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70837
The RISC-V ISA defines RV32E as an alternative "base" instruction set
encoding, that differs from RV32I by having only 16 rather than 32 registers.
This patch adds basic definitions for RV32E as well as MC layer support
(assembling, disassembling) and tests. The only supported ABI on RV32E is
ILP32E.
Add a new RISCVFeatures::validate() helper to RISCVUtils which can be called
from codegen or MC layer libraries to validate the combination of TargetTriple
and FeatureBitSet. Other targets have similar checks (e.g. erroring if SPE is
enabled on PPC64 or oddspreg + o32 ABI on Mips), but they either duplicate the
checks (Mips), or fail to check for both codegen and MC codepaths (PPC).
Codegen for the ILP32E ABI support and RV32E codegen are left for a future
patch/patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59470
llvm-svn: 356744
This patch adds proper handling of -target-abi, as accepted by llvm-mc and
llc. Lowering (codegen) for the hard-float ABIs will follow in a subsequent
patch. However, this patch does add MC layer support for the hard float and
RVE ABIs (emission of the appropriate ELF flags
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/blob/master/riscv-elf.md#-file-header).
ABI parsing must be shared between codegen and the MC layer, so we add
computeTargetABI to RISCVUtils. A warning will be printed if an invalid or
unrecognized ABI is given.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59023
llvm-svn: 355771
Craig Topper