As proposed in https://github.com/WebAssembly/simd/pull/380. This commit makes
the new instructions available only via clang builtins and LLVM intrinsics to
make their use opt-in while they are still being evaluated for inclusion in the
SIMD proposal.
Depends on D93771.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93775
And add them to the pipeline via
AMDGPUTargetMachine::registerPassBuilderCallbacks(), which mirrors
AMDGPUTargetMachine::adjustPassManager().
These passes can't be unconditionally added to PassRegistry.def since
they are only present when the AMDGPU backend is enabled. And there are
no target-specific headers in llvm/include, so parsing these pass names
must occur somewhere in the AMDGPU directory. I decided the best place
was inside the TargetMachine, since the PassBuilder invokes
TargetMachine::registerPassBuilderCallbacks() anyway. If we come up with
a cleaner solution for target-specific passes in the future that's fine,
but there aren't too many target-specific IR passes living in
target-specific directories so it shouldn't be too bad to change in the
future.
Reviewed By: ychen, arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93863
The MIRParser expects unnamed stack entries to have empty names ('').
In case of unnamed alloca instructions, the MIRPrinter would output
'<unnamed alloca>', which caused the MIRParser to reject the generated
code.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93685
Basic block containing "if" not necessarily dominates block that is the "false" target for the if.
That "false" target block may have another predecessor besides the "if" block. IR value corresponding to the Exec mask is generated by the
si_if intrinsic and then used by the end_cf intrinsic. In this case IR verifier complains that 'Def does not dominate all uses'.
This change split the edge between the "if" block and "false" target block to make it dominated by the "if" block.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91435
Define those intrinsics and lower to V instructions.
Use update_llc_test_checks.py for viota.m tests to check
earlyclobber is applied correctly.
mask viota.m tests uses the same argument as input and mask for
avoid dependency of D93364.
We work with @rogfer01 from BSC to come out this patch.
Reviewed By: HsiangKai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93823
Currently undef is used as a don’t-care vector when constructing a vector using a series of insertelement.
However, this is problematic because undef isn’t undefined enough.
Especially, a sequence of insertelement can be optimized to shufflevector, but using undef as its placeholder makes shufflevector a poison-blocking instruction because undef cannot be optimized to poison.
This makes a few straightforward optimizations incorrect, such as:
```
; https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44185
define <4 x float> @insert_not_undef_shuffle_translate_commute(float %x, <4 x float> %y, <4 x float> %q) {
%xv = insertelement <4 x float> %q, float %x, i32 2
%r = shufflevector <4 x float> %y, <4 x float> %xv, <4 x i32> { 0, 6, 2, undef }
ret <4 x float> %r ; %r[3] is undef
}
=>
define <4 x float> @insert_not_undef_shuffle_translate_commute(float %x, <4 x float> %y, <4 x float> %q) {
%r = insertelement <4 x float> %y, float %x, i32 1
ret <4 x float> %r ; %r[3] = %y[3], incorrect if %y[3] = poison
}
Transformation doesn't verify!
ERROR: Target is more poisonous than source
```
I’d like to suggest
1. Using poison as insertelement’s placeholder value (IRBuilder::CreateVectorSplat should be patched too)
2. Updating shufflevector’s semantics to return poison element if mask is undef
Note that poison is currently lowered into UNDEF in SelDag, so codegen part is okay.
m_Undef() matches PoisonValue as well, so existing optimizations will still fire.
The only concern is hidden miscompilations that will go incorrect when poison constant is given.
A conservative way is copying all tests having `insertelement undef` & replacing it with `insertelement poison` & run Alive2 on it, but it will create many tests and people won’t like it. :(
Instead, I’ll simply locally maintain the tests and run Alive2.
If there is any bug found, I’ll report it.
Relevant links: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43958 , http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-November/137242.html
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93586
If neon is disabled, LowerCTPOP will return SDValue() to indicate
that normal legalization should be used. However, ReplaceNodeResults
does not check for this and pushes the empty SDValue() onto the
result vector, which will subsequently result in a crash.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93825
Define vwredsumu/vwredsum/vfwredosum/vfwredsum
We work with @rogfer01 from BSC to come out this patch.
Authored-by: Roger Ferrer Ibanez <rofirrim@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-by: Zakk Chen <zakk.chen@sifive.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93807
Define vpopc/vfirst intrinsics and lower to V instructions.
We work with @rogfer01 from BSC to come out this patch.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93795
Define vector mask-register logical intrinsics and lower them
to V instructions. Also define pseudo instructions vmmv.m
and vmnot.m.
We work with @rogfer01 from BSC to come out this patch.
Authored-by: Roger Ferrer Ibanez <rofirrim@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-by: Zakk Chen <zakk.chen@sifive.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93705
This patch defines vrgather intrinsics and lower to V instructions.
We work with @rogfer01 from BSC to come out this patch.
Authored-by: Roger Ferrer Ibanez <rofirrim@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-by: ShihPo Hung <shihpo.hung@sifive.com>
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93797
integer group:
vredsum/vredmaxu/vredmax/vredminu/vredmin/vredand/vredor/vredxor
float group:
vfredosum/vfredsum/vfredmax/vfredmin
We work with @rogfer01 from BSC to come out this patch.
Authored-by: Roger Ferrer Ibanez <rofirrim@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-by: Zakk Chen <zakk.chen@sifive.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93746
Currently 'resume' is lowered to _Unwind_Resume with out "noreturn" attribute. Semantically _Unwind_Resume library call is expected to never return and should be marked as such. Though I didn't find any changes in behavior of existing tests there will be a difference once https://reviews.llvm.org/D79485 lands.
I was not able to come up with the test case anything better than just checking for presence of "noreturn" attribute. Please let me know if there is a better way to test the change.
Reviewed By: xbolva00
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93682
Currently, the compiler crashes in instruction selection of global
load/stores in gfx600 due to the lack of FLAT instructions. This patch
fix the crash by selecting MUBUF instructions for global load/stores
in gfx600.
Authored-by: Praveen Velliengiri <Praveen.Velliengiri@amd.com>
Reviewed by: t-tye
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92483
Fixes a bug introduced by D91589.
When folding `(sext (not i1 x)) -> (add (zext i1 x), -1)`, we try to replace the not first when possible. If we replace the not in-visit, then the now invalidated node will be returned, and subsequently we will return an invalid sext. In cases where the not is replaced in-visit we can simply return SDValue, as the not in the current sext should have already been replaced.
Thanks @jgorbe, for finding the below reproducer.
The following reduced test case crashes clang when built with `clang -O1 -frounding-math`:
```
template <class> class a {
int b() { return c == 0.0 ? 0 : -1; }
int c;
};
template class a<long>;
```
A debug build of clang produces this "assertion failed" error:
```
clang: /home/jgorbe/code/llvm/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp:264: void {anonymous}::DAGCombiner::AddToWorklist(llvm::
SDNode*): Assertion `N->getOpcode() != ISD::DELETED_NODE && "Deleted Node added to Worklist"' failed.
```
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93274
This patch extends the SDNode ISel support for RVV from only the
vector/vector instructions to include the vector/scalar and
vector/immediate forms.
It uses splat_vector to carry the scalar in each case, except when
XLEN<SEW (RV32 SEW=64) when a custom node `SPLAT_VECTOR_I64` is used for
type-legalization and to encode the fact that the value is sign-extended
to SEW. When the scalar is a full 64-bit value we use a sequence to
materialize the constant into the vector register.
The non-intrinsic ISel patterns have also been split into their own
file.
Authored-by: Roger Ferrer Ibanez <rofirrim@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-by: Fraser Cormack <fraser@codeplay.com>
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93312
Every basic block section symbol created by -fbasic-block-sections will contain
".__part." to know that this symbol corresponds to a basic block fragment of
the function.
This patch solves two problems:
a) Like D89617, we want function symbols with suffixes to be properly qualified
so that external tools like profile aggregators know exactly what this
symbol corresponds to.
b) The current basic block naming just adds a ".N" to the symbol name where N is
some integer. This collides with how clang creates __cxx_global_var_init.N.
clang creates these symbol names to call constructor functions and basic
block symbol naming should not use the same style.
Fixed all the test cases and added an extra test for __cxx_global_var_init
breakage.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93082
Also include a special case pattern to use vmv.v.x vd, zero when
the argument is 0.0.
Reviewed By: khchen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93672
Current approach doesn't work well in cases when multiple paths are predicted to be "cold". By "cold" paths I mean those containing "unreachable" instruction, call marked with 'cold' attribute and 'unwind' handler of 'invoke' instruction. The issue is that heuristics are applied one by one until the first match and essentially ignores relative hotness/coldness
of other paths.
New approach unifies processing of "cold" paths by assigning predefined absolute weight to each block estimated to be "cold". Then we propagate these weights up/down IR similarly to existing approach. And finally set up edge probabilities based on estimated block weights.
One important difference is how we propagate weight up. Existing approach propagates the same weight to all blocks that are post-dominated by a block with some "known" weight. This is useless at least because it always gives 50\50 distribution which is assumed by default anyway. Worse, it causes the algorithm to skip further heuristics and can miss setting more accurate probability. New algorithm propagates the weight up only to the blocks that dominates and post-dominated by a block with some "known" weight. In other words, those blocks that are either always executed or not executed together.
In addition new approach processes loops in an uniform way as well. Essentially loop exit edges are estimated as "cold" paths relative to back edges and should be considered uniformly with other coldness/hotness markers.
Reviewed By: yrouban
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79485
Adds ARMBankConflictHazardRecognizer. This hazard recognizer
looks for a few situations where the same base pointer is used and
then checks whether the offsets lead to a bank conflict. Two
parameters are also added to permit overriding of the target
assumptions:
arm-data-bank-mask=<int> - Mask of bits which are to be checked for
conflicts. If all these bits are equal in the offsets, there is a
conflict.
arm-assume-itcm-bankconflict=<bool> - Assume that there will be bank
conflicts on any loads to a constant pool.
This hazard recognizer is enabled for Cortex-M7, where the Technical
Reference Manual states that there are two DTCM banks banked using bit
2 and one ITCM bank.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93054
This patch defines vfwmacc, vfwnmacc, vfwmsc, vfwnmsac intrinsics
and lower to V instructions.
We work with @rogfer01 from BSC to come out this patch.
Authored-by: Roger Ferrer Ibanez <rofirrim@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-by: ShihPo Hung <shihpo.hung@sifive.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93693
Define vmerge/vfmerge intrinsics and lower to V instructions.
Include support for vector-vector vfmerge by vmerge.vvm.
We work with @rogfer01 from BSC to come out this patch.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93674
Define the vfmin, vfmax IR intrinsics for the respective V instructions.
Authored-by: Roger Ferrer Ibanez <rofirrim@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-by: Evandro Menezes <evandro.menezes@sifive.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93673
This patch defines vfmadd/vfnmacc, vfmsac/vfnmsac, vfmadd/vfnmadd,
and vfmsub/vfnmsub lower to V instructions.
Authored-by: Roger Ferrer Ibanez <rofirrim@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-by: ShihPo Hung <shihpo.hung@sifive.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93691
This patch defines vwmacc[u|su|us] intrinsics and lower to V instructions.
We work with @rogfer01 from BSC to come out this patch.
Authored-by: Roger Ferrer Ibanez <rofirrim@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-by: ShihPo Hung <shihpo.hung@sifive.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93675
It does not seem to fold offsets but this is not specific
to the flat scratch as getPtrBaseWithConstantOffset() does
not return the split for these tests unlike its SDag
counterpart.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93670
Adjust SITargetLowering::allowsMisalignedMemoryAccessesImpl for
unaligned flat scratch support. Mostly needed for global isel.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93669
Using the store rightmost vector element instructions to do vector
element extraction and store. The rightmost vector element on little
endian is the zeroth vector element, with these patterns that element
can be extracted and stored in one instruction for all vector types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89195
These operations are lowered to RBIT and REVB instructions
respectively. In the case of fixed-length support using SVE we
also lower BITREVERSE operating on NEON sized vectors as this
results in fewer instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93606
This patch enables jump table lowering in the RISC-V backend.
In addition to the test case included, the new lowering was
tested by compiling the OCaml runtime and running it under qemu.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92097
On subtargets that have a red zone, we will copy the stack pointer to the base
pointer in the prologue prior to updating the stack pointer. There are no other
updates to the base pointer after that. This suggests that we should be able to
restore the stack pointer from the base pointer rather than loading it from the
back chain or adding the frame size back to either the stack pointer or the
frame pointer.
This came about because functions that call setjmp need to restore the SP from
the FP because the back chain might have been clobbered
(see https://reviews.llvm.org/D92906). However, if the stack is realigned, the
restored SP might be incorrect (which is what caused the failures in the two
ASan test cases).
This patch was tested quite extensivelly both with sanitizer runtimes and
general code.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93327
Define vector compare intrinsics and lower them to V instructions.
We work with @rogfer01 from BSC to come out this patch.
Authored-by: Roger Ferrer Ibanez <rofirrim@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-by: Hsiangkai Wang <kai.wang@sifive.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93368
Define vleff intrinsics and lower to V instructions.
We work with @rogfer01 from BSC to come out this patch.
Authored-by: Roger Ferrer Ibanez <rofirrim@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-by: Zakk Chen <zakk.chen@sifive.com>
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93516
When LegalizeType procedure widens a masked_gather, set MemoryType's EltNum equal to Result's EltNum.
As I mentioned in https://reviews.llvm.org/D91092, in previous code, If we have a v17i32's masked_gather in avx512, we widen it to a v32i32's masked_gather with a v17i32's MemoryType. When the SplitVecRes_MGATHER process this v32i32's masked_gather, GetSplitDestVTs will assert fail since what you are going to split is v17i32.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93610
Thomas Lively