This was orginally committed in 2245fb8aaa.
but was immediately reverted in f3abd54958
because of a PHI handling issue.
Original commit message:
1. It doesn't make sense to enforce that the bonus instruction
is only used once in it's basic block. What matters is
whether those user instructions fit within our budget, sure,
but that is another question.
2. It doesn't make sense to enforce that said bonus instructions
are only used within their basic block. Perhaps the branch
condition isn't using the value computed by said bonus instruction,
and said bonus instruction is simply being calculated
to be used in successors?
So iff we can clone bonus instructions, to lift these restrictions,
we just need to carefully update their external uses
to use the new cloned instructions.
Notably, this transform (even without this change) appears to be
poison-unsafe as per alive2, but is otherwise (including the patch) legal.
We don't introduce any new PHI nodes, but only "move" the instructions
around, i'm not really seeing much potential for extra cost modelling
for the transform, especially since now we allow at most one such
bonus instruction by default.
This causes the fold to fire +11.4% more (13216 -> 14725)
as of vanilla llvm test-suite + RawSpeed.
The motivational pattern is IEEE-754-2008 Binary16->Binary32
extension code:
ca57d77fb2/src/librawspeed/common/FloatingPoint.h (L115-L120)
^ that should be a switch, but it is not now: https://godbolt.org/z/bvja5v
That being said, even thought this seemed like this would fix it: https://godbolt.org/z/xGq3TM
apparently that fold is happening somewhere else afterall,
so something else also has a similar 'artificial' restriction.
This hints the operand of a t2DoLoopStart towards using LR, which can
help make it more likely to become t2DLS lr, lr. This makes it easier to
move if needed (as the input is the same as the output), or potentially
remove entirely.
The hint is added after others (from COPY's etc) which still take
precedence. It needed to find a place to add the hint, which currently
uses the post isel custom inserter.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89883
This changes the definition of t2DoLoopStart from
t2DoLoopStart rGPR
to
GPRlr = t2DoLoopStart rGPR
This will hopefully mean that low overhead loops are more tied together,
and we can more reliably generate loops without reverting or being at
the whims of the register allocator.
This is a fairly simple change in itself, but leads to a number of other
required alterations.
- The hardware loop pass, if UsePhi is set, now generates loops of the
form:
%start = llvm.start.loop.iterations(%N)
loop:
%p = phi [%start], [%dec]
%dec = llvm.loop.decrement.reg(%p, 1)
%c = icmp ne %dec, 0
br %c, loop, exit
- For this a new llvm.start.loop.iterations intrinsic was added, identical
to llvm.set.loop.iterations but produces a value as seen above, gluing
the loop together more through def-use chains.
- This new instrinsic conceptually produces the same output as input,
which is taught to SCEV so that the checks in MVETailPredication are not
affected.
- Some minor changes are needed to the ARMLowOverheadLoop pass, but it has
been left mostly as before. We should now more reliably be able to tell
that the t2DoLoopStart is correct without having to prove it, but
t2WhileLoopStart and tail-predicated loops will remain the same.
- And all the tests have been updated. There are a lot of them!
This patch on it's own might cause more trouble that it helps, with more
tail-predicated loops being reverted, but some additional patches can
hopefully improve upon that to get to something that is better overall.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89881
This reverts commit 38f625d0d1.
This commit contains some holes in its logic and has been causing
issues since it was commited. The idea sounds OK but some cases were not
handled correctly. Instead of trying to fix that up later it is probably
simpler to revert it and work to reimplement it in a more reliable way.
Fix the ARM backend's analyzeBranch so it doesn't ignore predicated
return instructions, and make the MachineVerifier rule more strict.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40061
This adds sign/zero extending scalar loads/stores to the MVE
instructions added in D77813, allowing us to create up more post-inc
instructions. These are comparatively simple, compared to LDR/STR (which
may be better turned into an LDRD/LDM), but still require some additions
over MVE instructions. Because there are i12 and i8 variants of the
offset loads/stores dealing with different signs, we may need to convert
an i12 address to a i8 negative instruction. t2LDRBi12 can also be
shrunk to a tLDRi under the right conditions, so we need to be careful
with codesize too.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78625
As far as I can tell, it should not be necessary for VCTP to be
unpredictable in tail predicated loops. Either it has a a valid loop
counter as a operand which will naturally keep it in the right loop, or
it doesn't and it won't be converted to a tail predicated loop. Not
marking it as having side effects allows it to be scheduled more cleanly
for cases where it is not expected to become a tail predicate loop.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83907
Given a loop with two subloops, it should be possible for both to be
converted to hardware loops. That's what this patch does, simply enough.
It slightly alters the loop iterating order to try and convert all
subloops. If one (or more) succeeds, it stops as before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78502
In more complicated loops we can easily hit the complexity limits of
loop strength reduction. If we do and filtering occurs, it's all too
easy to remove the wrong formulae for post-inc preferring accesses due
to it attempting to maximise register re-use. The patch adds an
alternative filtering step when the target is preferring postinc to pick
postinc formulae instead, hopefully lowering the complexity to below the
limit so that aggressive filtering is not needed.
There is also a change in here to stop considering existing addrecs as
free under postinc. We should already be modelling them as a reg so
don't want it to cause us to get the cost wrong. (I'm not sure that code
makes sense in general, but there are X86 tests specifically for it
where it seems to be helping so have left it around for the standard
non-post-inc case).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80273
Under MVE a vdup will always take a gpr register, not a floating point
value. During DAG combine we convert the types to a bitcast to an
integer in an attempt to fold the bitcast into other instructions. This
is OK, but only works inside the same basic block. To do the same trick
across a basic block boundary we need to convert the type in
codegenprepare, before the splat is sunk into the loop.
This adds a convertSplatType function to codegenprepare to do that,
putting bitcasts around the splat to force the type to an integer. There
is then some adjustment to the code in shouldSinkOperands to handle the
extra bitcasts.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78728
Some MVE floating point instructions have gpr register variants that take
the scalar gpr value and splat them to all lanes. In order to accept
them in loops, the shuffle_vector and insert need to be sunk down into
the loop, next to the instruction so that ISel can see the whole
pattern.
This does that sinking for FAdd, FSub, FMul and FCmp. The patterns for
mul are slightly more constrained as there are no fms variants taking
register arguments.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76023
This adds a simple fold to combine VMOVrh load to a integer load.
Similar to what is already performed for BITCAST, but needs to account
for the types being of different sizes, creating an zero extending load.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76485
The MVE VDUP instruction take a GPR and splats into every lane of a
vector register. Unlike NEON we do not have a VDUPLANE equivalent
instruction, doing the same splat from a fp register. Previously a VDUP
to a v4f32/v8f16 would be represented as a (v4f32 VDUP f32), which
would mean the instruction pattern needs to add a COPY_TO_REGCLASS to
the GPR.
Instead this now converts that earlier during an ISel DAG combine,
converting (VDUP x) to (VDUP (bitcast x)). This can allow instruction
selection to tell that the input needs to be an i32, which in one of the
testcases allows it to use ldr (or specifically ldm) over (vldr;vmov).
Whilst being simple enough for floats, as the types sizes are the same,
these is no BITCAST equivalent for getting a half into a i32. This uses
a VMOVrh ARMISD node, which doesn't know the same tricks yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76292
Roman Lebedev