MVE has a dual lane vector move instruction, capable of moving two
general purpose registers into lanes of a vector register. They look
like one of:
vmov q0[2], q0[0], r2, r0
vmov q0[3], q0[1], r3, r1
They only accept these lane indices though (and only insert into an
i32), either moving lanes 1 and 3, or 0 and 2.
This patch adds some tablegen patterns for them, selecting from vector
inserts elements. Because the insert_elements are know to be
canonicalized to ascending order there are several patterns that we need
to select. These lane indices are:
3 2 1 0 -> vmovqrr 31; vmovqrr 20
3 2 1 -> vmovqrr 31; vmov 2
3 1 -> vmovqrr 31
2 1 0 -> vmovqrr 20; vmov 1
2 0 -> vmovqrr 20
With the top one being the most common. All other potential patterns of
lane indices will be matched by a combination of these and the
individual vmov pattern already present. This does mean that we are
selecting several machine instructions at once due to the need to
re-arrange the inserts, but in this case there is nothing else that will
attempt to match an insert_vector_elt node.
This is a recommit of 6cc3d80a84 after
fixing the backward instruction definitions.
MVE has a dual lane vector move instruction, capable of moving two
general purpose registers into lanes of a vector register. They look
like one of:
vmov q0[2], q0[0], r2, r0
vmov q0[3], q0[1], r3, r1
They only accept these lane indices though (and only insert into an
i32), either moving lanes 1 and 3, or 0 and 2.
This patch adds some tablegen patterns for them, selecting from vector
inserts elements. Because the insert_elements are know to be
canonicalized to ascending order there are several patterns that we need
to select. These lane indices are:
3 2 1 0 -> vmovqrr 31; vmovqrr 20
3 2 1 -> vmovqrr 31; vmov 2
3 1 -> vmovqrr 31
2 1 0 -> vmovqrr 20; vmov 1
2 0 -> vmovqrr 20
With the top one being the most common. All other potential patterns of
lane indices will be matched by a combination of these and the
individual vmov pattern already present. This does mean that we are
selecting several machine instructions at once due to the need to
re-arrange the inserts, but in this case there is nothing else that will
attempt to match an insert_vector_elt node.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92553
This adds patterns for v16i16's vecreduce, using all the existing code
to go via an i32 VADDV/VMLAV and truncating the result.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85452
In the original batch of MVE VMOVimm code generation VMOV.i64 was left
out due to the way it was done downstream. It turns out that it's fairly
simple though. This adds the codegen for it, similar to NEON.
Bigendian is technically incorrect in this version, which John is fixing
in a Neon patch.
Following on from the extra VADDV lowering, this extends things to
handle VADDLV which allows summing values into a pair of i32 registers,
together treated as a i64. This needs to be done in DAGCombine too as
the types are otherwise illegal, which is a fairly simple addition on
top of the existing code.
There is also a VADDLVA instruction handled here, that adds the incoming
values from the two general purpose registers. As opposed to the
non-long version where we could just add patterns for add(x, VADDV), the
long version needs to handle this early before the i64 has being split
into too many pieces.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74224
We already make use of the VADDV vector reduction instruction for cases
where the input and the output start out at the same type. The MVE
instruction however will sum into an i32, so if we are summing a v16i8
into an i32, we can still use the same instructions. In terms of IR,
this looks like a sext of a legal type (v16i8) into a very illegal type
(v16i32) and a vecreduce.add of that into the result. This means we have
to catch the pattern early in a DAG combine, producing a target VADDVs/u
node, where the signedness is now important.
This is the first part, handling VADDV and VADDVA. There are also
VADDVL/VADDVLA instructions, which are interesting because they sum into
a 64bit value. And VMLAV and VMLALV, which are interesting because they
also do a multiply of two values. It may look a little odd in places as
a result.
On it's own this will probably not do very much, as the vectorizer will
not produce this IR yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74218
David Green