```
// The legacy PM CGPassManager discovers SCCs this way:
for function in the source order
tarjanSCC(function)
// While the new PM CGSCCPassManager does:
for function in the reversed source order [1]
discover a reference graph SCC
build call graph SCCs inside the reference graph SCC
```
In the common cases, reference graph ~= call graph, the new PM order is
undesired because for `a | b | c` (3 independent functions), the new PM will
process them in the reversed order: c, b, a. If `a <-> b <-> c`, we can see
that `-print-after-all` will report the sole SCC as `scc: (c, b, a)`.
This patch corrects the iteration order. The discovered SCC order will match
the legacy PM in the common cases.
For some tests (`Transforms/Inline/cgscc-*.ll` and
`unittests/Analysis/CGSCCPassManagerTest.cpp`), the behaviors are dependent on
the SCC discovery order and there are too many check lines for the particular
order. This patch simply reverses the function order to avoid changing too many
check lines.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90566
There are cases that generated OpenMP code consists of multiple,
consecutive OpenMP parallel regions, either due to high-level
programming models, such as RAJA, Kokkos, lowering to OpenMP code, or
simply because the programmer parallelized code this way. This
optimization merges consecutive parallel OpenMP regions to: (1) reduce
the runtime overhead of re-activating a team of threads; (2) enlarge the
scope for other OpenMP optimizations, e.g., runtime call deduplication
and synchronization elimination.
This implementation defensively merges parallel regions, only when they
are within the same BB and any in-between instructions are safe to
execute in parallel.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83635
Arthur Eubanks