After D85099, if we have attribute group in the function signature that hasn't
been seen before, and later a callsite with the same attribute group, filecheck will evaluate
the first attribute group to for example '#0 {'. We now include { in the args_and_sig group to avoid this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86769
This is effectively reverting rGbfdc2552664d to avoid test churn
while we figure out a better way forward.
We at least salvage the warning on name conflict from that patch
though.
If we change the default string again, we may want to mass update
tests at the same time. Alternatively, we could live with the poor
naming if we change -instnamer.
This also adds a test to LLVM as suggested in the post-commit
review. There's a clang test that is also affected. That seems
like a layering violation, but I have not looked at fixing that yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80584
Update test scripts were limited because they performed a single action
on the entire file and if that action was controlled by arguments, like
the one introduced in D68819, there was no record of it.
This patch introduces the capability of changing the arguments passed to
the script "on-the-fly" while processing a test file. In addition, an
"on/off" switch was added so that processing can be disabled for parts
of the file where the content is simply copied. The last extension is a
record of the invocation arguments in the auto generated NOTE. These
arguments are also picked up in a subsequent invocation, allowing
updates with special options enabled without user interaction.
To change the arguments the string `UTC_ARGS:` has to be present in a
line, followed by "additional command line arguments". That is
everything that follows `UTC_ARGS:` will be added to a growing list
of "command line arguments" which is reparsed after every update.
Reviewed By: arichardson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69701
If we have `int foo(int a) { return a; }` and we run with --function-signature
enabled, we want a single variable declaration for `a` which is reused
later.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69722
Summary:
This commit adds basic tests for these update script to validate that
they still work as expected. In the future we could extend these tests
whenever new features are added to avoid introducing regressions.
Reviewers: xbolva00, MaskRay, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70660
sstefan1