declaration name of the array when present. This ensures that
a poor-man's C++03 static_assert will include the user error message
often embedded in the name.
Update all the tests to reflect the new wording, and add a test for the
name behavior.
llvm-svn: 122802
template argument (described by an expression, of course). For
example:
template<int...> struct int_tuple { };
template<int ...Values>
struct square {
typedef int_tuple<(Values*Values)...> type;
};
It also lays the foundation for pack expansions in an initializer-list.
llvm-svn: 122751
caused an assertion when dealing with non-type template parameter
packs. Add some tests for deduction and instantiation of non-type
template parameter packs.
llvm-svn: 122534
extract the appropriate argument from the argument pack (based on the
current substitution index, of course). Simple instantiation of pack
expansions involving non-type template parameter packs now works.
llvm-svn: 122532
packs, e.g.,
template<typename T, unsigned ...Dims> struct multi_array;
along with semantic analysis support for finding unexpanded non-type
template parameter packs in types, expressions, and so on.
Template instantiation involving non-type template parameter packs
probably doesn't work yet. That'll come soon.
llvm-svn: 122527
parameter packs (C++0x [dcl.fct]p13), including disambiguation between
unnamed function parameter packs and varargs (C++0x [dcl.fct]p14) for
cases like
void f(T...)
where T may or may not contain unexpanded parameter packs.
llvm-svn: 122520
specialization's template arguments against the primary template's
template arguments using the obvious, correct method of checking the
injected-class-name type (C++ [temp.class.spec]p9b3). The previous
incarnation of this comparison attempted to use its own formulation of
the injected-class-name, which is redudant and, with the introduction
of variadic templates, became wrong (again).
llvm-svn: 122508
template argument corresponding to a template parameter pack is an
argument pack of a pack expansion of that template parameter
pack. Implements C++0x [temp.dep.type]p2 (at least, as much of it as
we can).
llvm-svn: 122498
parameter packs. In particular, a parameter pack not otherwise deduced
is deduced to an empty parameter pack.
The C++0x wording here is a bit unfortunate; this should really only
apply to function templates, and it mentions "trailing" parameter
packs, which doesn't really make sense in the context of function
templates. Will file a core issue separately.
llvm-svn: 122463
the presence of a pack expansion anywhere except at the end of a
template-argument-list causes the entire template-argument-list to be
a non-deduced context.
llvm-svn: 122461
single routine. Extend that routine to handle consistency
checking for template argument packs, so that we can compare the
deduced packs for template parameter packs across different pack
expansions.
llvm-svn: 122452
pattern is a template argument, which involves repeatedly deducing
template arguments using the pattern of the pack expansion, then
bundling the resulting deductions into an argument pack.
We can now handle a variety of simple list-handling metaprograms using
variadic templates. See, e.g., the new "count" metaprogram.
llvm-svn: 122439
dependent template specialization type, the number of template
arguments need not match precisely. Rather than checking the number of
arguments eagerly (which does not consider argument packs), let the
deduction routine for template argument lists cope with too many/too
few arguments.
llvm-svn: 122425
deduction. Unify all of the looping over template arguments for
deduction purposes into a single place, where argument pack expansion
occurs; this is also the hook for deducing from pack expansions, which
itself is not yet implemented.
For now, at least we can handle a basic "count" metafunction written
with variadics. See the new test for the formulation that works.
llvm-svn: 122418
whose patterns are template arguments. We can now instantiate, e.g.,
typedef tuple<pair<OuterTypes, InnerTypes>...> type;
where OuterTypes and InnerTypes are template type parameter packs.
There is a horrible inefficiency in
TemplateArgumentLoc::getPackExpansionPattern(), where we need to
create copies of TypeLoc data because our interfaces traffic in
TypeSourceInfo pointers where they should traffic in TypeLocs
instead. I've isolated in efficiency in this one routine; once we
refactor our interfaces to traffic in TypeLocs, we can eliminate it.
llvm-svn: 122278
a parameter pack, check the parameter pack against each of the
template arguments it corresponds to, then pack the converted
arguments into a template argument pack. Allows us to use variadic
class templates so long as instantiation isn't required, e.g.,
template<typename... Types> struct Tuple;
Tuple<int, float> *t2;
llvm-svn: 122251
pack expansions, e.g. given
template<typename... Types> struct tuple;
template<typename... Types>
struct tuple_of_refs {
typedef tuple<Types&...> types;
};
the type of the "types" typedef is a PackExpansionType whose pattern
is Types&.
This commit introduces support for creating pack expansions for
template type arguments, as above, but not for any other kind of pack
expansion, nor for any form of instantiation.
llvm-svn: 122223
declarations. This is a work in progress, as I go through the C++
declaration grammar to identify where unexpanded parameter packs can
occur.
llvm-svn: 121912
parameter packs within a statement, type, etc. Use this visitor to
provide improved diagnostics for the presence of unexpanded parameter
packs in a full expression, base type, declaration type, etc., by
highlighting the unexpanded parameter packs and providing their names,
e.g.,
test/CXX/temp/temp.decls/temp.variadic/p5.cpp:28:85: error: declaration type
contains unexpanded parameter packs 'VeryInnerTypes',
'OuterTypes', ...
...VeryInnerTypes, OuterTypes>, pair<InnerTypes, OuterTypes> > types;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
llvm-svn: 121883
whether the expression contains an unexpanded parameter pack, in the
same vein as the changes to the Type hierarchy. Compute this bit
within all of the Expr subclasses.
This change required a bunch of reshuffling of dependency
calculations, mainly to consolidate them inside the constructors and
to fuse multiple loops that iterate over arguments to determine type
dependence, value dependence, and (now) containment of unexpanded
parameter packs.
Again, testing is painfully sparse, because all of the diagnostics
will change and it is more important to test the to-be-written visitor
that collects unexpanded parameter packs.
llvm-svn: 121831
and TemplateArgument with an operation that determines whether there
are any unexpanded parameter packs within that construct. Use this
information to diagnose the appearance of the names of parameter packs
that have not been expanded (C++ [temp.variadic]p5). Since this
property is checked often (every declaration, ever expression
statement, etc.), we extend Type and Expr with a bit storing the
result of this computation, rather than walking the AST each time to
determine whether any unexpanded parameter packs occur.
This commit is deficient in several ways, which will be remedied with
future commits:
- Expr has a bit to store the presence of an unexpanded parameter
pack, but it is never set.
- The error messages don't point out where the unexpanded parameter
packs were named in the type/expression, but they should.
- We don't check for unexpanded parameter packs in all of the places
where we should.
- Testing is sparse, pending the resolution of the above three
issues.
llvm-svn: 121724
Douglas Gregor