We've decided to make the core rewriter class and PP rewriters mandatory.
They're only a few hundred lines of code in total and not worth supporting as a
distinct build configuration, especially since doing so disables key compiler
features.
This reverts commit r213150.
Revert "clang/test: Introduce the feature "rewriter" for --enable-clang-rewriter."
This reverts commit r213148.
Revert "Move clang/test/Frontend/rewrite-*.c to clang/test/Frontend/Rewriter/"
This reverts commit r213146.
llvm-svn: 213159
C++ [basic.start.main]p1: "It shall have a return type of type int"
ISO C is also clear about this, so only accept 'int' with qualifiers in GNUMode
C.
llvm-svn: 212171
Sema::MergeFunctionDecl attempts merging two decls even if the old decl
is invalid. This can lead to interesting circumstances where we
successfully merge the decls but the result makes no sense.
Take the following for example:
template <typename T>
int main(void);
int main(void);
Sema will not consider these to be overloads of the same name because
main can't be overloaded, which means that this must be a redeclaration.
In this case the templated decl is compatible with the non-templated
decl allowing the Sema::CheckFunctionDeclaration machinery to move on
and do bizarre things like setting the previous decl of a non-templated
decl to a templated decl!
The way I see it, we should just bail from MergeFunctionDecl if the old
decl is invalid.
This fixes PR16531.
llvm-svn: 185779
This boils down to us sending invalid function decls to
CheckFunctionDeclaration becauswe we did not consider that CheckMain
could cause the decl to be invalid. Instead, interogate the new decl's
main-validity and *then* send it over to get CheckFunctionDeclaration'd
if it was still valid after calling CheckMain.
llvm-svn: 185745
Alp Toker