Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Richard Smith c7fb225cdc PR16638, DR1552: the exception specification on an implicitly-declared
'operator delete' or 'operator delete[]' is an explicit exception
specification. Therefore we should diagnose 'void operator delete(void*)'
instead of 'void operator delete(void*) noexcept'.

This diagnostic remains an ExtWarn, since in practice people don't always
include the exception specification in such a declaration.

llvm-svn: 201002
2014-02-07 22:51:16 +00:00
Richard Smith 66f3ac9d21 Rework implementation of DR1492: Apply the resolution to operator delete too,
since it also has an implicit exception specification. Downgrade the error to
an extwarn, since at least for operator delete, system headers like to declare
it as 'noexcept' whereas the implicit definition does not have an explicit
exception specification. Move the exception specification for user-declared
'operator delete' functions from the type-as-written into the type, to reflect
reality and to allow us to detect whether there was an implicit exception spec
or not.

llvm-svn: 166372
2012-10-20 08:26:51 +00:00
Richard Smith 9ca5c42582 Update all tests other than Driver/std.cpp to use -std=c++11 rather than
-std=c++0x. Patch by Ahmed Charles!

llvm-svn: 141900
2011-10-13 22:29:44 +00:00
Sebastian Redl 37588097af Make deallocation functions implicitly noexcept in C++0x.
llvm-svn: 127596
2011-03-14 18:08:30 +00:00