The problem here is more serious than the fix implies. Adding a field
to a class updates the triviality bits for the class (among other
things). Failing to require a complete type before adding the field
meant that these updates don't happen in the well-formed case where
the capture is an uninstantiated class template specialization,
leading the lambda itself to be treated as having a trivial copy
constructor when it shouldn't. Fixes <rdar://problem/15560464>.
llvm-svn: 197623
- Complete the lambda class when we finish the lambda expression
(previously, it was left in the "being completed" state)
- Actually return the LambdaExpr object and bind to the resulting
temporary when needed.
- Detect when cleanups are needed while capturing a variable into a
lambda (e.g., due to default arguments in the copy constructor), and
make sure those cleanups apply for the whole of the lambda
expression.
llvm-svn: 150123
- Capturing variables by-reference and by-copy within a lambda
- The representation of lambda captures
- The creation of the non-static data members in the lambda class
that store the captured variables
- The initialization of the non-static data members from the
captured variables
- Pretty-printing lambda expressions
There are a number of FIXMEs, both explicit and implied, including:
- Creating a field for a capture of 'this'
- Improved diagnostics for initialization failures when capturing
variables by copy
- Dealing with temporaries created during said initialization
- Template instantiation
- AST (de-)serialization
- Binding and returning the lambda expression; turning it into a
proper temporary
- Lots and lots of semantic constraints
- Parameter pack captures
llvm-svn: 149977
Douglas Gregor