Summary:
This is one possible solution to the problem of ignoring constraints that Simon
raised in D21473 but it's a bit of a hack.
The integrated assembler currently ignores violations of the tied register
constraints when the operands involved in a tie are both present in the AsmText.
For example, 'dati $rs, $rt, $imm' with the '$rs = $rt' will silently replace
$rt with $rs. So 'dati $2, $3, 1' is processed as if the user provided
'dati $2, $2, 1' without any diagnostic being emitted.
This is difficult to solve properly because there are multiple parts of the
matcher that are silently forcing these constraints to be met. Tied operands are
rendered to instructions by cloning previously rendered operands but this is
unnecessary because the matcher was already instructed to render the operand it
would have cloned. This is also unnecessary because earlier code has already
replaced the MCParsedOperand with the one it was tied to (so the parsed input
is matched as if it were 'dati <RegIdx 2>, <RegIdx 2>, <Imm 1>'). As a result,
it looks like fixing this properly amounts to a rewrite of the tied operand
handling which affects all targets.
This patch however, merely inserts a checking hook just before the
substitution of MCParsedOperands and the Mips target overrides it. It's not
possible to accurately check the registers are the same this early (because
numeric registers haven't been bound to a register class yet) so it cheats a
bit and checks that the tokens that produced the operand are lexically
identical. This works because tied registers need to have the same register
class but it does have a flaw. It will reject 'dati $4, $a0, 1' for violating
the constraint even though $a0 ends up as the same register as $4.
Reviewers: sdardis
Subscribers: dsanders, llvm-commits, sdardis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21994
llvm-svn: 276867
Patch by Nitesh Jain.
Summary: The type of Imm in MipsDisassembler.cpp was incorrect since SignExtend64 return int64_t type.As per the MIPSr6 doc ,the offset is added to the address of the instruction following the branch (not the branch itself), to form a PC-relative effective target address hence “4” is added to the offset. The offset of some test case are update to reflect the changes due to “ + 4 ” offset and new test case for negative offset are added.
Reviewers: dsanders, vkalintiris
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17540
llvm-svn: 270542
Alias 'jic $reg, 0' to 'jrc $reg' and 'jialc $reg, 0' to 'jalrc $reg' like
binutils.
This patch was previous committed as r266055 as seemed to have caused some spurious
test failures. They did not reappear after further local testing.
llvm-svn: 266301
Summary:
Alias 'jic $reg, 0' to 'jrc $reg' and 'jialc $reg, 0' to 'jalrc $reg' like
binutils.
Reviewers: dsanders
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18856
llvm-svn: 266055
Summary:
The bug was that the MIPS32R6/MIPS64R6/microMIPS32R6 versions of LSA and DLSA
(unlike the MSA version) failed to account for the off-by-one encoding of the
immediate. The range is actually 1..4 rather than 0..3.
Reviewers: vkalintiris
Subscribers: atanasyan, dsanders, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14015
llvm-svn: 252295
Summary:
This patch remaps the assembly idiom 'move' to 'or' instead of 'daddu' or
'addu'. The use of addu/daddu instead of or as move was highlighted as a
performance issue during the analysis of a recent 64bit design. Originally
move was encoded as 'or' by binutils but was changed for the r10k cpu family
due to their pipeline which had 2 arithmetic units and a single logical unit,
and so could issue multiple (d)addu based moves at the same time but only 1
logical move.
This patch preserves the disassembly behaviour so that disassembling a old style
(d)addu move still appears as move, but assembling move always gives an or
Patch by Simon Dardis.
Reviewers: vkalintiris
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11796
llvm-svn: 244579
Summary:
Previously it (incorrectly) used GPR's.
Patch by Simon Dardis. A couple small corrections by myself.
Reviewers: dsanders
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10567
llvm-svn: 240883
These tests are asserting and crashing for me, and 'not' sees that as a
non-zero exit code instead of a signal code for obscure Windows reasons.
This causes the test to pass, giving me an unclean 'ninja check'.
The test is already XFAILd, so just run the test without 'not' and let
lit handle the failure.
llvm-svn: 226958
The tests for the ISA's should now be approximately diffable. That is, the
output of 'diff valid-mips1.txt valid-mips2.txt' should be emit the lines
for instructions that were added/removed to/from MIPS-I by MIPS-II. This
doesn't work perfectly at the moment due to ordering differences but it
should be close.
llvm-svn: 226408
Daniel Sanders