ActOnFinishFunctionBody/ActOnBlockStmtExpr. This way, we ensure that
we diagnose undefined labels before the jump-scope checker gets run,
since the jump-scope checker requires (as its invariant) that all of
the GotoStmts be wired up correctly.
Fixes PR9495.
llvm-svn: 127738
template specialization types. This also required some parser tweaks,
since we were losing track of the nested-name-specifier's source
location information in several places in the parser. Other notable
changes this required:
- Sema::ActOnTagTemplateIdType now type-checks and forms the
appropriate type nodes (+ source-location information) for an
elaborated-type-specifier ending in a template-id. Previously, we
used a combination of ActOnTemplateIdType and
ActOnTagTemplateIdType that resulted in an ElaboratedType wrapped
around a DependentTemplateSpecializationType, which duplicated the
keyword ("class", "struct", etc.) and nested-name-specifier
storage.
- Sema::ActOnTemplateIdType now gets a nested-name-specifier, which
it places into the returned type-source location information.
- Sema::ActOnDependentTag now creates types with source-location
information.
llvm-svn: 126808
nested-name-speciciers within elaborated type names, e.g.,
enum clang::NestedNameSpecifier::SpecifierKind
Fixes in this iteration include:
(1) Compute the type-source range properly for a dependent template
specialization type that starts with "template template-id ::", as
in a member access expression
dep->template f<T>::f()
This is a latent bug I triggered with this change (because now we're
checking the computed source ranges for dependent template
specialization types). But the real problem was...
(2) Make sure to set the qualifier range on a dependent template
specialization type appropriately. This will go away once we push
nested-name-specifier locations into dependent template
specialization types, but it was the source of the
valgrind errors on the buildbots.
llvm-svn: 126765
information for qualifier type names throughout the parser to address
several problems.
The commit message from r126737:
Push nested-name-specifier source location information into elaborated
name types, e.g., "enum clang::NestedNameSpecifier::SpecifierKind".
Aside from the normal changes, this also required some tweaks to the
parser. Essentially, when we're looking at a type name (via
getTypeName()) specifically for the purpose of creating an annotation
token, we pass down the flag that asks for full type-source location
information to be stored within the returned type. That way, we retain
source-location information involving nested-name-specifiers rather
than trying to reconstruct that information later, long after it's
been lost in the parser.
With this change, test/Index/recursive-cxx-member-calls.cpp is showing
much improved results again, since that code has lots of
nested-name-specifiers.
llvm-svn: 126748
name types, e.g., "enum clang::NestedNameSpecifier::SpecifierKind".
Aside from the normal changes, this also required some tweaks to the
parser. Essentially, when we're looking at a type name (via
getTypeName()) specifically for the purpose of creating an annotation
token, we pass down the flag that asks for full type-source location
information to be stored within the returned type. That way, we retain
source-location information involving nested-name-specifiers rather
than trying to reconstruct that information later, long after it's
been lost in the parser.
With this change, test/Index/recursive-cxx-member-calls.cpp is showing
much improved results again, since that code has lots of
nested-name-specifiers.
llvm-svn: 126737
nested-name-specifier, e.g.,
T::template apply<U>::
represent the dependent template name specialization as a
DependentTemplateSpecializationType, rather than a
TemplateSpecializationType with a dependent TemplateName.
llvm-svn: 126593
specifiers such as
typename T::template apply<U>
Previously, we would turn T::template apply<U> into a
TemplateSpecializationType. Then, we'd reprocess that
TemplateSpecializationType and turn it into either a
TemplateSpecializationType wrapped in an ElaboratedType (when we could
resolve "apply" to a template declaration) or a
DependentTemplateSpecializationType. We now produce the same ASTs but
without generating the intermediate TemplateSpecializationType.
The end goal here is to avoid generating TemplateSpecializationTypes
with dependent template-names, ever. We're not there yet.
llvm-svn: 126589
nested-name-specifiers throughout the parser, and provide a new class
(NestedNameSpecifierLoc) that contains a nested-name-specifier along
with its type-source information.
Right now, this information is completely useless, because we don't
actually store the source-location information anywhere in the
AST. Call this Step 1/N.
llvm-svn: 126391
When we are in code-completion mode, skip parsing of all function bodies except the one where the
code-completion point resides.
For big .cpp files like 'SemaExpr.cpp' the improvement makes a huge difference, in some cases cutting down
code-completion time -62% !
We don't get diagnostics for the bodies though, so modify the code-completion tests that check for errors.
See rdar://8814203.
llvm-svn: 122765
instantiations, GCC also supports "inline" and "static" explicit
template instantiations. Parse and warn about such constructs, but
don't implement the semantics of either "inline" or "static". They
don't seem to be widely used.
llvm-svn: 120599
-Move the stuff of Diagnostic related to creating/querying diagnostic IDs into a new DiagnosticIDs class.
-DiagnosticIDs can be shared among multiple Diagnostics for multiple translation units.
-The rest of the state in Diagnostic object is considered related and tied to one translation unit.
-Have Diagnostic point to the SourceManager that is related with. Diagnostic can now accept just a
SourceLocation instead of a FullSourceLoc.
-Reflect the changes to various interfaces.
llvm-svn: 119730
part of parser recovery. For example, given:
a method1:arg];
we detect after parsing the expression "a" that we have the start of a
message send expression. We pretend we've seen a '[' prior to the a,
then parse the remainder as a message send. We'll then give a
diagnostic+fix-it such as:
fixit-objc-message.m:17:3: error: missing '[' at start of message
send expression
a method1:arg];
^
[
The algorithm here is very simple, and always assumes that the open
bracket goes at the beginning of the message send. It also only works
for non-super instance message sends at this time.
llvm-svn: 113968
One who seeks the Tao unlearns something new every day.
Less and less remains until you arrive at non-action.
When you arrive at non-action,
nothing will be left undone.
llvm-svn: 112244
token. The first token might be something that ends up triggering code
completion, which in turn requires a valid Scope. Test case forthcoming.
llvm-svn: 112066
- move DeclSpec &c into the Sema library
- move ParseAST into the Parse library
Reflect this change in a thousand different includes.
Reflect this change in the link orders.
llvm-svn: 111667
Douglas Gregor