C89 allowed a type specifier to be elided with the resulting type being
int, aka implicit int behavior. This feature was subsequently removed
in C99 without a deprecation period, so implementations continued to
support the feature. Now, as with implicit function declarations, is a
good time to reevaluate the need for this support.
This patch allows -Wimplicit-int to issue warnings in C89 mode (off by
default), defaults the warning to an error in C99 through C17, and
disables support for the feature entirely in C2x. It also removes a
warning about missing declaration specifiers that really was just an
implicit int warning in disguise and other minor related cleanups.
Before C++20, MSVC treated any friend function declaration as a function declaration, so the following code would compile despite funGlob being declared after its first call:
```
class Glob {
public:
friend void funGlob();
void test() {
funGlob();
}
};
void funGlob() {}
```
This proposed patch mimics the MSVC behavior when in MSVC compatibility mode
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124613
In C++ and C2x, we would avoid calling ImplicitlyDefineFunction at all,
but in OpenCL mode we would still call the function and have it produce
an error diagnostic. Instead, we now have a helper function to
determine when implicit function definitions are allowed and we use
that to determine whether to call ImplicitlyDefineFunction so that the
behavior is more consistent across language modes.
This changes the diagnostic behavior from telling the users that an
implicit function declaration is not allowed in OpenCL to reporting use
of an unknown identifier and going through typo correction, as done in
C++ and C2x.
Strutures of function pointers are a good surface area for attacks. We
should therefore randomize them unless explicitly told not to.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123544
A record may have more than just FieldDecls in it. If so, then we're
likely to drop them if we only randomize the FieldDecls.
We need to be careful about anonymous structs/unions. Their fields are
made available in the RecordDecl as IndirectFieldDecls, which are listed
after the anonymous struct/union. The ordering doesn't appear to be
super important, however we place them unrandomized at the end of the
RecordDecl just in case. There's also the possiblity of
StaticAssertDecls. We also want those at the end.
All other non-FieldDecls we place at the top, just in case we get
something like:
struct foo {
enum e { BORK };
enum e a;
};
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/185
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123958
Shader attribute is for shader library identify entry functions.
Here's an example,
[shader("pixel")]
float ps_main() : SV_Target {
return 1;
}
When compile this shader to library target like -E lib_6_3, compiler needs to know ps_main is an entry function for pixel shader. Shader attribute is to offer the information.
A new attribute HLSLShader is added to support shader attribute. It has an EnumArgument which included all possible shader stages.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123907
This is extended to all `std::` functions that take a reference to a
value and return a reference (or pointer) to that same value: `move`,
`forward`, `move_if_noexcept`, `as_const`, `addressof`, and the
libstdc++-specific function `__addressof`.
We still require these functions to be declared before they can be used,
but don't instantiate their definitions unless their addresses are
taken. Instead, code generation, constant evaluation, and static
analysis are given direct knowledge of their effect.
This change aims to reduce various costs associated with these functions
-- per-instantiation memory costs, compile time and memory costs due to
creating out-of-line copies and inlining them, code size at -O0, and so
on -- so that they are not substantially more expensive than a cast.
Most of these improvements are very small, but I measured a 3% decrease
in -O0 object file size for a simple C++ source file using the standard
library after this change.
We now automatically infer the `const` and `nothrow` attributes on these
now-builtin functions, in particular meaning that we get a warning for
an unused call to one of these functions.
In C++20 onwards, we disallow taking the addresses of these functions,
per the C++20 "addressable function" rule. In earlier language modes, a
compatibility warning is produced but the address can still be taken.
The same infrastructure is extended to the existing MSVC builtin
`__GetExceptionInfo`, which is now only recognized in namespace `std`
like it always should have been.
This is a re-commit of
fc30901096,
a571f82a50,
64c045e25b, and
de6ddaeef3,
and reverts aa643f455a.
This change also includes a workaround for users using libc++ 3.1 and
earlier (!!), as apparently happens on AIX, where std::move sometimes
returns by value.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123345
Revert "Fixup D123950 to address revert of D123345"
This reverts commit aa643f455a.
WG14 has elected to remove support for K&R C functions in C2x. The
feature was introduced into C89 already deprecated, so after this long
of a deprecation period, the committee has made an empty parameter list
mean the same thing in C as it means in C++: the function accepts no
arguments exactly as if the function were written with (void) as the
parameter list.
This patch implements WG14 N2841 No function declarators without
prototypes (http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2841.htm)
and WG14 N2432 Remove support for function definitions with identifier
lists (http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2432.pdf).
It also adds The -fno-knr-functions command line option to opt into
this behavior in other language modes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123955
C89 had a questionable feature where the compiler would implicitly
declare a function that the user called but was never previously
declared. The resulting function would be globally declared as
extern int func(); -- a function without a prototype which accepts zero
or more arguments.
C99 removed support for this questionable feature due to severe
security concerns. However, there was no deprecation period; C89 had
the feature, C99 didn't. So Clang (and GCC) both supported the
functionality as an extension in C99 and later modes.
C2x no longer supports that function signature as it now requires all
functions to have a prototype, and given the known security issues with
the feature, continuing to support it as an extension is not tenable.
This patch changes the diagnostic behavior for the
-Wimplicit-function-declaration warning group depending on the language
mode in effect. We continue to warn by default in C89 mode (due to the
feature being dangerous to use). However, because this feature will not
be supported in C2x mode, we've diagnosed it as being invalid for so
long, the security concerns with the feature, and the trivial
workaround for users (declare the function), we now default the
extension warning to an error in C99-C17 mode. This still gives users
an easy workaround if they are extensively using the extension in those
modes (they can disable the warning or use -Wno-error to downgrade the
error), but the new diagnostic makes it more clear that this feature is
not supported and should be avoided. In C2x mode, we no longer allow an
implicit function to be defined and treat the situation the same as any
other lookup failure.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122983
This is extended to all `std::` functions that take a reference to a
value and return a reference (or pointer) to that same value: `move`,
`forward`, `move_if_noexcept`, `as_const`, `addressof`, and the
libstdc++-specific function `__addressof`.
We still require these functions to be declared before they can be used,
but don't instantiate their definitions unless their addresses are
taken. Instead, code generation, constant evaluation, and static
analysis are given direct knowledge of their effect.
This change aims to reduce various costs associated with these functions
-- per-instantiation memory costs, compile time and memory costs due to
creating out-of-line copies and inlining them, code size at -O0, and so
on -- so that they are not substantially more expensive than a cast.
Most of these improvements are very small, but I measured a 3% decrease
in -O0 object file size for a simple C++ source file using the standard
library after this change.
We now automatically infer the `const` and `nothrow` attributes on these
now-builtin functions, in particular meaning that we get a warning for
an unused call to one of these functions.
In C++20 onwards, we disallow taking the addresses of these functions,
per the C++20 "addressable function" rule. In earlier language modes, a
compatibility warning is produced but the address can still be taken.
The same infrastructure is extended to the existing MSVC builtin
`__GetExceptionInfo`, which is now only recognized in namespace `std`
like it always should have been.
This is a re-commit of
fc30901096,
a571f82a50, and
64c045e25b
which were reverted in
e75d8b7037
due to a crasher bug where CodeGen would emit a builtin glvalue as an
rvalue if it constant-folds.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123345
std::addressof, plus the libstdc++-specific std::__addressof.
This brings us to parity with the corresponding GCC behavior.
Remove STDBUILTIN macro that ended up not being used.
We still require these functions to be declared before they can be used,
but don't instantiate their definitions unless their addresses are
taken. Instead, code generation, constant evaluation, and static
analysis are given direct knowledge of their effect.
This change aims to reduce various costs associated with these functions
-- per-instantiation memory costs, compile time and memory costs due to
creating out-of-line copies and inlining them, code size at -O0, and so
on -- so that they are not substantially more expensive than a cast.
Most of these improvements are very small, but I measured a 3% decrease
in -O0 object file size for a simple C++ source file using the standard
library after this change.
We now automatically infer the `const` and `nothrow` attributes on these
now-builtin functions, in particular meaning that we get a warning for
an unused call to one of these functions.
In C++20 onwards, we disallow taking the addresses of these functions,
per the C++20 "addressable function" rule. In earlier language modes, a
compatibility warning is produced but the address can still be taken.
The same infrastructure is extended to the existing MSVC builtin
`__GetExceptionInfo`, which is now only recognized in namespace `std`
like it always should have been.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123345
Given the declaration:
typedef void func_t(unsigned);
__attribute__((noreturn)) func_t func;
we would incorrectly determine that `func` had no prototype because the
`noreturn` attribute would convert the underlying type directly into a
FunctionProtoType, but the declarator for `func` itself was not one for
a function with a prototype. This adds an additional check for when the
declarator is a type representation for a function with a prototype.
When emitting a "conflicting types" warning for a function declaration,
it's more clear to diagnose the previous declaration specifically as
being a builtin if it one.
This is the template version of https://reviews.llvm.org/D114251.
This patch introduces a new template name kind (UsingTemplateName). The
UsingTemplateName stores the found using-shadow decl (and underlying
template can be retrieved from the using-shadow decl). With the new
template name, we can be able to find the using decl that a template
typeloc (e.g. TemplateSpecializationTypeLoc) found its underlying template,
which is useful for tooling use cases (include cleaner etc).
This patch merely focuses on adding the node to the AST.
Next steps:
- support using-decl in qualified template name;
- update the clangd and other tools to use this new node;
- add ast matchers for matching different kinds of template names;
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123127
We did not implement C99 6.7.5.3p15 fully in that we missed the rule
for compatible function types where a prior declaration has a prototype
and a subsequent definition (not just declaration) has an empty
identifier list or an identifier list with a mismatch in parameter
arity. This addresses that situation by issuing an error on code like:
void f(int);
void f() {} // type conflicts with previous declaration
(Note: we already diagnose the other type conflict situations
appropriately, this was the only situation we hadn't covered that I
could find.)
It breaks arm build, there is no free bit for the extra
UsingShadowDecl in TemplateName::StorageType.
Reverting it to build the buildbot back until we comeup with a fix.
This reverts commit 5a5be4044f.
This is the template version of https://reviews.llvm.org/D114251.
This patch introduces a new template name kind (UsingTemplateName). The
UsingTemplateName stores the found using-shadow decl (and underlying
template can be retrieved from the using-shadow decl). With the new
template name, we can be able to find the using decl that a template
typeloc (e.g. TemplateSpecializationTypeLoc) found its underlying template,
which is useful for tooling use cases (include cleaner etc).
This patch merely focuses on adding the node to the AST.
Next steps:
- support using-decl in qualified template name;
- update the clangd and other tools to use this new node;
- add ast matchers for matching different kinds of template names;
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123127
According to CWG 1394 and C++20 [dcl.fct.def.general]p2,
Clang should not diagnose incomplete types if function body is "= delete;".
For example:
```
struct Incomplete;
Incomplete f(Incomplete) = delete; // well-formed
```
Also close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/52802
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122981
The Randstruct feature is a compile-time hardening technique that
randomizes the field layout for designated structures of a code base.
Admittedly, this is mostly useful for closed-source releases of code,
since the randomization seed would need to be available for public and
open source applications.
Why implement it? This patch set enhances Clang’s feature parity with
that of GCC which already has the Randstruct feature. It's used by the
Linux kernel in certain structures to help thwart attacks that depend on
structure layouts in memory.
This patch set is a from-scratch reimplementation of the Randstruct
feature that was originally ported to GCC. The patches for the GCC
implementation can be found here:
https://www.openwall.com/lists/kernel-hardening/2017/04/06/14
Link: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-March/061607.html
Co-authored-by: Cole Nixon <nixontcole@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Connor Kuehl <cipkuehl@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: James Foster <jafosterja@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jeff Takahashi <jeffrey.takahashi@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jordan Cantrell <jordan.cantrell@mail.com>
Co-authored-by: Nikk Forbus <nicholas.forbus@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Tim Pugh <nwtpugh@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Bill Wendling <isanbard@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bill Wendling <isanbard@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121556
This reverts commit 3f0587d0c6.
Not all tests pass after a few rounds of fixes.
I spot one failure that std::shuffle (potentially different results with
different STL implementations) was misused and replaced it with llvm::shuffle,
but there appears to be another failure in a Windows build.
The latest failure is reported on https://reviews.llvm.org/D121556#3440383
Functions without prototypes in C (also known as K&R C functions) were
introduced into C89 as a deprecated feature and C2x is now reclaiming
that syntax space with different semantics. However, Clang's
-Wstrict-prototypes diagnostic is off-by-default (even in pedantic
mode) and does not suffice to warn users about issues in their code.
This patch changes the behavior of -Wstrict-prototypes to only diagnose
declarations and definitions which are not going to change behavior in
C2x mode, and enables the diagnostic in -pedantic mode. The diagnostic
is now specifically about the fact that the feature is deprecated.
It also adds -Wdeprecated-non-prototype, which is grouped under
-Wstrict-prototypes and diagnoses declarations or definitions which
will change behavior in C2x mode. This diagnostic is enabled by default
because the risk is higher for the user to continue to use the
deprecated feature.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122895
The Randstruct feature is a compile-time hardening technique that
randomizes the field layout for designated structures of a code base.
Admittedly, this is mostly useful for closed-source releases of code,
since the randomization seed would need to be available for public and
open source applications.
Why implement it? This patch set enhances Clang’s feature parity with
that of GCC which already has the Randstruct feature. It's used by the
Linux kernel in certain structures to help thwart attacks that depend on
structure layouts in memory.
This patch set is a from-scratch reimplementation of the Randstruct
feature that was originally ported to GCC. The patches for the GCC
implementation can be found here:
https://www.openwall.com/lists/kernel-hardening/2017/04/06/14
Link: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-March/061607.html
Co-authored-by: Cole Nixon <nixontcole@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Connor Kuehl <cipkuehl@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: James Foster <jafosterja@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jeff Takahashi <jeffrey.takahashi@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jordan Cantrell <jordan.cantrell@mail.com>
Co-authored-by: Nikk Forbus <nicholas.forbus@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Tim Pugh <nwtpugh@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Bill Wendling <isanbard@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bill Wendling <isanbard@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121556
This adjusts the handling for:
export module M;
export namespace {};
export namespace N {};
export using namespace N;
In the first case, we were allowing empty anonymous namespaces
as part of an extension allowing empty top-level entities, but that seems
inappropriate in this case, since the linkage would be internal for the
anonymous namespace. We now report an error for this.
The second case was producing a warning diagnostic that this was
accepted as an extension - however the C++20 standard does allow this
as well-formed.
In the third case we keep the current practice that this is accepted with a
warning (as an extension). The C++20 standard says it's an error.
We also ensure that using decls are only applied to items with external linkage.
This adjusts error messages for exports involving redeclarations in modules to
be more specific about the reason that the decl has been rejected.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122119
Without the fix ivars with anonymous types can trigger errors like
> error: 'TestClass::structIvar' from module 'Target' is not present in definition of 'TestClass' provided earlier
> [...]
> note: declaration of 'structIvar' does not match
It happens because types of ivars from different modules are considered
to be different. And it is caused by not merging anonymous `TagDecl`
from different modules.
To fix that I've changed `serialization::needsAnonymousDeclarationNumber`
to handle anonymous `TagDecl` inside `ObjCInterfaceDecl`. But that's not
sufficient as C code inside `ObjCInterfaceDecl` doesn't use interface
decl as a decl context but switches to its parent (TranslationUnit in
most cases). I'm changing that to make `ObjCContainerDecl` the lexical
decl context but keeping the semantic decl context intact.
Test "check-dup-decls-inside-objc.m" doesn't reflect a change in
functionality but captures the existing behavior to prevent regressions.
rdar://85563013
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118525
This adds diagnostics for conflicting attributes on the same
declarataion, conflicting attributes on a forward and final
declaration, and defines a more narrowly scoped HLSLEntry attribute
target.
Big shout out to @aaron.ballman for the great feedback and review on
this!
HLSL uses Microsoft-style attributes `[attr]`, which clang mostly
ignores. For HLSL we need to handle known Microsoft attributes, and to
maintain C/C++ as-is we ignore unknown attributes.
To utilize this new code path, this change adds the HLSL `numthreads`
attribute.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122627
Some functions can end up non-externally visible despite not being
declared "static" or in an unnamed namespace in C++ - such as by having
parameters that are of non-external types.
Such functions aren't mistakenly intended to be defining some function
that needs a declaration. They could be maybe more legible (except for
the operator new example) with an explicit static, but that's a
stylistic thing outside what should be addressed by a warning.
This reapplies 275c56226d - once we figure
out what to do about the change in behavior for -Wnon-c-typedef-for-linkage
(this reverts the revert commit 85ee1d3ca1)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121328
Update `WeakUndeclaredIdentifiers` to hold a collection of weak
aliases per identifier instead of only one.
This also allows the "used" state to be removed from `WeakInfo`
because it is really only there as an alternative to removing
processed map entries, and we can represent that using an empty set
now. The serialization code is updated for the removal of the field.
Additionally, a PCH test is added for the new functionality.
The records are grouped by the "target" identifier, which was already
being used as a key for lookup purposes. We also store only one record
per alias name; combined, this means that diagnostics are grouped by
the "target" and limited to one per alias (which should be acceptable).
Fixes PR28611.
Fixesllvm/llvm-project#28985.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, cebowleratibm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121927
Co-authored-by: Rachel Craik <rcraik@ca.ibm.com>
Co-authored-by: Jamie Schmeiser <schmeise@ca.ibm.com>
Move the SourceRange from the old ParsedAttributesWithRange into
ParsedAttributesView, so we have source range information available
everywhere we use attributes.
This also removes ParsedAttributesWithRange (replaced by simply using
ParsedAttributes) and ParsedAttributesVieWithRange (replaced by using
ParsedAttributesView).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121201
Previously, an attempt to declare an overload of a multiversion function
in C was not properly diagnosed. In some cases, diagnostics were simply
missing. In other cases the following assertion failure occured...
```
Assertion `(Previous.empty() || llvm::any_of(Previous, [](const NamedDecl *ND) { return ND->hasAttr(); })) && "Non-redecls shouldn't happen without overloadable present"' failed.
```
... or the following diagnostic was spuriously issued.
```
error: at most one overload for a given name may lack the 'overloadable' attribute
```
The diagnostics issued in some cases could be improved. When the function
type of a redeclaration does not match the prior declaration, it would be
preferable to diagnose the type mismatch before diagnosing mismatched
attributes. Diagnostics are also missing for some cases.
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121959
Checking of multiversion function declarations performed by various functions
in clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp previously forced the valus of a passed in
'MergeTypeWithPrevious' reference argument in several scenarios. This was
unnecessary and possibly incorrect in the one case that the value
was forced to 'true' (though seemingly unobservably so).
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121958
This change removes redundant code in the definition of
CheckTargetCausesMultiVersioning() in SemaDecl.cpp. The removed code checked
for multiversion function support. The code immediately following the removed
code is a call to CheckMultiVersionAdditionalRules(); that function performs
the same check on entry. In both cases, the consequences of missing multiversion
function support results in the same diagnostic message being issued and the
applicable function declaration being marked as invalid.
Reviewed By: erichkeane, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121957
This change removes dead code in the definition of CheckMultiVersionFunction()
in clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp. The removed code was made dead by commit
fc53eb69c26cdd7efa6b629c187d04326f0448ca: "Reapply 'Implement target_clones multiversioning'".
See the added code just above the code being deleted; it contains the same
return statement with the previous condition now distributed across an if
statement and a switch statement.
Reviewed By: erichkeane, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121955
Regresses:
typedef struct {
static void f() {
}
} a_t;
Causing this to error instead of warn, because the linkage is computed
earlier/too early perhaps. I'll send out a review to see if there's some
other path forward or if this is an acceptable regression, etc.
This reverts commit 275c56226d.
The `objc_precise_lifetime` attribute is applied to Objective-C pointers to ensure the optimizer does not prematurely release an object under Automatic Reference Counting (ARC). It is a common enough pattern to assign values to these variables but not reference them otherwise, and annotating them with `__unused` is not really correct as they are being used to ensure an object's lifetime.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120372
This implements the parsing and recognition of module partition CMIs
and removes the FIXMEs in the parser.
Module partitions are recognised in the base computation of visibility,
however additional amendments to visibility follow in subsequent patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118586
The above change assumed that malloc (and friends) would always
allocate memory to getNewAlign(), even for allocations which have a
smaller size. This is not actually required by spec (a 1-byte
allocation may validly have 1-byte alignment).
Some real-world malloc implementations do not provide this guarantee,
and thus this optimization is breaking programs.
Fixes#53540
This reverts commit c2297544c0.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118804
Some functions can end up non-externally visible despite not being
declared "static" or in an unnamed namespace in C++ - such as by having
parameters that are of non-external types.
Such functions aren't mistakenly intended to be defining some function
that needs a declaration. They could be maybe more legible (except for
the `operator new` example) with an explicit static, but that's a
stylistic thing outside what should be addressed by a warning.
Do not warn on reserved identifiers resulting from expansion of system macros.
Also properly test -Wreserved-identifier wrt. system headers.
Should fix#49592
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118532
This commit checks if a function is marked with the naked attribute
and, if it is, will silence the emission of any unused-parameter
warning.
Inside a naked function only the usage of basic ASM instructions is
expected. In this context the parameters can actually be used by
fetching them according to the underlying ABI. Since parameters might
be used through ASM instructions, the linter and the compiler will have
a hard time understanding if one of those is unused or not, therefore
no unused-parameter warning should ever be triggered whenever a
function is marked naked.
Since only the decls inhabit in a namespace scope could be exported, it
is not meaningful to check it in CheckRedeclarationExported, which
implements [module.interface]/p6.
Reviewed By: urnathan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118120
Special classes such as accessor, sampler, and stream need additional
implementation when they are passed from host to device.
This patch is adding a new attribute “sycl_special_class” used to mark
SYCL classes/struct that need the additional compiler handling.
There is a comment contains a FIXME for the Module TS. And now the
Module TS is merged so we should update the comment. I've checked the
implementation.
This fixes bug 47716.
According to [module.interface]p2, it is meaningless to export an entity
which is not in namespace scope.
The reason why the compiler crashes is that the compiler missed
ExportDecl when the compiler traverse the subclass of DeclContext. So
here is the crash.
Also, the patch implements [module.interface]p6 in
Sema::CheckRedeclaration* functions.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, urnathan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112903
Often we run into situations where we want to ignore
warnings from system headers, but Clang will still
give warnings about the contents of a macro defined
in a system header used in user-code.
Introduce a ShowInSystemMacro option to be able to
specify which warnings we do want to keep raising
warnings for. The current behavior is kept in this patch
(i.e. warnings from system macros are enabled by default).
The decision as to whether this should be an opt-in or opt-out
feature can be made in a separate patch.
To put the feature to test, replace duplicated code for
Wshadow and Wold-style-cast with the SuppressInSystemMacro tag.
Also disable the warning for C++20 designators, fixing #52944.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116833
A function call `unresolved()` in C will generate an implicit declaration
of the missing function and warn `ext_implicit_function_decl` or so.
(Compared to in C++ where we get `err_undeclared_var_use`).
We want to try to resolve these names.
Unfortunately typo correction is disabled in sema for performance
reasons unless this warning is promoted to error.
(We need typo correction for include-fixer.)
It's not clear to me where a switch to force this correction on should
go, include-fixer is kind of a hack. So hack more by telling sema we're
promoting them to error.
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/937
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115490
This reverts commit cc56c66f27.
Fixed a bad assertion, the target of a UsingShadowDecl must not have
*local* qualifiers, but it can be a typedef whose underlying type is qualified.
Currently there's no way to find the UsingDecl that a typeloc found its
underlying type through. Compare to DeclRefExpr::getFoundDecl().
Design decisions:
- a sugar type, as there are many contexts this type of use may appear in
- UsingType is a leaf like TypedefType, the underlying type has no TypeLoc
- not unified with UnresolvedUsingType: a single name is appealing,
but being sometimes-sugar is often fiddly.
- not unified with TypedefType: the UsingShadowDecl is not a TypedefNameDecl or
even a TypeDecl, and users think of these differently.
- does not cover other rarer aliases like objc @compatibility_alias,
in order to be have a concrete API that's easy to understand.
- implicitly desugared by the hasDeclaration ASTMatcher, to avoid
breaking existing patterns and following the precedent of ElaboratedType.
Scope:
- This does not cover types associated with template names introduced by
using declarations. A future patch should introduce a sugar TemplateName
variant for this. (CTAD deduced types fall under this)
- There are enough AST matchers to fix the in-tree clang-tidy tests and
probably any other matchers, though more may be useful later.
Caveats:
- This changes a fairly common pattern in the AST people may depend on matching.
Previously, typeLoc(loc(recordType())) matched whether a struct was
referred to by its original scope or introduced via using-decl.
Now, the using-decl case is not matched, and needs a separate matcher.
This is similar to the case of typedefs but nevertheless both adds
complexity and breaks existing code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114251
Down the path, if there is a implicit instantiation, this may trigger
the assertion "Member specialization must be an explicit specialization"
in `clang::FunctionDecl::setFunctionTemplateSpecialization`.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113245
Down the path, if there is a implicit instantiation, this may trigger
the assertion "Member specialization must be an explicit specialization"
in `clang::FunctionDecl::setFunctionTemplateSpecialization`.
WG14 adopted the _ExtInt feature from Clang for C23, but renamed the
type to be _BitInt. This patch does the vast majority of the work to
rename _ExtInt to _BitInt, which accounts for most of its size. The new
type is exposed in older C modes and all C++ modes as a conforming
extension. However, there are functional changes worth calling out:
* Deprecates _ExtInt with a fix-it to help users migrate to _BitInt.
* Updates the mangling for the type.
* Updates the documentation and adds a release note to warn users what
is going on.
* Adds new diagnostics for use of _BitInt to call out when it's used as
a Clang extension or as a pre-C23 compatibility concern.
* Adds new tests for the new diagnostic behaviors.
I want to call out the ABI break specifically. We do not believe that
this break will cause a significant imposition for early adopters of
the feature, and so this is being done as a full break. If it turns out
there are critical uses where recompilation is not an option for some
reason, we can consider using ABI tags to ease the transition.
See discussion in D51650, this change was a little aggressive in an
error while doing a 'while we were here', so this removes that error
condition, as it is apparently useful.
This reverts commit bb4934601d.
This implements the following changes:
* AutoType retains sugared deduced-as-type.
* Template argument deduction machinery analyses the sugared type all the way
down. It would previously lose the sugar on first recursion.
* Undeduced AutoType will be properly canonicalized, including the constraint
template arguments.
* Remove the decltype node created from the decltype(auto) deduction.
As a result, we start seeing sugared types in a lot more test cases,
including some which showed very unfriendly `type-parameter-*-*` types.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith, #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110216
This implements the following changes:
* AutoType retains sugared deduced-as-type.
* Template argument deduction machinery analyses the sugared type all the way
down. It would previously lose the sugar on first recursion.
* Undeduced AutoType will be properly canonicalized, including the constraint
template arguments.
* Remove the decltype node created from the decltype(auto) deduction.
As a result, we start seeing sugared types in a lot more test cases,
including some which showed very unfriendly `type-parameter-*-*` types.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110216
This implements the following changes:
* AutoType retains sugared deduced-as-type.
* Template argument deduction machinery analyses the sugared type all the way
down. It would previously lose the sugar on first recursion.
* Undeduced AutoType will be properly canonicalized, including the constraint
template arguments.
* Remove the decltype node created from the decltype(auto) deduction.
As a result, we start seeing sugared types in a lot more test cases,
including some which showed very unfriendly `type-parameter-*-*` types.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110216
As discussed here: https://lwn.net/Articles/691932/
GCC6.0 adds target_clones multiversioning. This functionality is
an odd cross between the cpu_dispatch and 'target' MV, but is compatible
with neither.
This attribute allows you to list all options, then emits a separately
optimized version of each function per-option (similar to the
cpu_specific attribute). It automatically generates a resolver, just
like the other two.
The mangling however, is... ODD to say the least. The mangling format
is:
<normal_mangling>.<option string>.<option ordinal>.
Differential Revision:https://reviews.llvm.org/D51650
Currently, this is only diagnosed but the decl is not marked invalid. This may hit assertions down the path.
This also reverts the fix for PR49534 since it is not needed anymore.
Reviewed By: hubert.reinterpretcast
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113145
The __block Objective-C pointers can be set but not used due to a commonly used lifetime extension pattern in Objective-C.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112850
This patch attempts to fix a compiler crash that occurs when long
double type is used with -mno-x87 compiler option.
The option disables x87 target feature, which in turn disables x87
registers, so CG cannot select them for x86_fp80 LLVM IR type. Long
double is lowered as x86_fp80 for some targets, so it leads to a
crash.
The option seems to contradict the SystemV ABI, which requires long
double to be represented as a 80-bit floating point, and it also
requires to use x87 registers.
To avoid that, `long double` type is disabled when -mno-x87 option is
set. In addition to that, `float` and `double` also use x87 registers
for return values on 32-bit x86, so they are disabled as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98895
When reaching the end of a function body, we need to ensure that the
ExitFunctionBodyRAII object is destroyed before we pop the declaration context
for the function. Exiting the function body causes us to handle immediate
invocations, which involves template transformations that need to know the
correct type for this.
This addresses PR48235.
There is no need to check for deferred diag when device compilation or target is
not given. This results in considerable build time improvement in some cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109175
This was committed as ec6c847179, but then reverted after a failure
in: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/84/builds/13983
I was not able to reproduce the problem, but I added an extra check
for a NULL QualType just in case.
Original comit message:
The patch adds missing diagnostics for cases like:
float F3 = ((__float128)F1 * (__float128)F2) / 2.0f;
Sema::checkDeviceDecl (renamed to checkTypeSupport) is changed to work
with a type without the corresponding ValueDecl. It is also refactored
so that host diagnostics for unsupported types can be added here as
well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109315
Current btf_tag is applied to declaration only.
Per discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D111199,
we plan to introduce btf_type_tag attribute for types.
So rename btf_tag to btf_decl_tag to make it easily
differentiable from btf_type_tag.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111588
With xlc and xlC pragma align(packed) will pack bitfields the same way
as pragma align(bit_packed). xlclang, xlclang++ and clang will
pack bitfields the same way as pragma pack(1). Issue a warning when
source code using pragma align(packed) is used to alert the user it
may not be compatable with xlc/xlC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107506
Allow multiversioning declarations to match when the actual formal
linkage matches, not just when the storage class is identical.
Additionally, change the ambiguous 'linkage' mismatch to be more
specific and say 'language linkage'.
This applies to -Wunused-but-set-variable and
-Wunused-but-set-parameter.
This addresses bug 51865.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109862
The patch adds missing diagnostics for cases like:
float F3 = ((__float128)F1 * (__float128)F2) / 2.0f;
Sema::checkDeviceDecl (renamed to checkTypeSupport) is changed to work
with a type without the corresponding ValueDecl. It is also refactored
so that host diagnostics for unsupported types can be added here as
well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109315
Mainly, if a constant value was passed as an alignment,
then we correctly annotate the alignment of the returned value
of @aligned_alloc. And if it wasn't constant,
then we also don't loose that, but emit an assumption.
Stephen Long