C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned. As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do. This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926  | 
			||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| time.point.arithmetic | ||
| time.point.cast | ||
| time.point.comparisons | ||
| time.point.cons | ||
| time.point.nonmember | ||
| time.point.observer | ||
| time.point.special | ||
| default_duration.pass.cpp | ||
| duration.compile.fail.cpp | ||