OSchip
/
llvm-project
mirror of https://github.com/THU-DSP-LAB/llvm-project.git
13
0
Fork 6
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/GuardWidening.cpp

692 lines
24 KiB
C++
Raw Blame History

//===- GuardWidening.cpp - ---- Guard widening ----------------------------===//
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// This file implements the guard widening pass. The semantics of the
// @llvm.experimental.guard intrinsic lets LLVM transform it so that it fails
// more often that it did before the transform. This optimization is called
// "widening" and can be used hoist and common runtime checks in situations like
// these:
//
// %cmp0 = 7 u< Length
// call @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp0) [ "deopt"(...) ]
// call @unknown_side_effects()
// %cmp1 = 9 u< Length
// call @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp1) [ "deopt"(...) ]
// ...
//
// =>
//
// %cmp0 = 9 u< Length
// call @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp0) [ "deopt"(...) ]
// call @unknown_side_effects()
// ...
//
// If %cmp0 is false, @llvm.experimental.guard will "deoptimize" back to a
// generic implementation of the same function, which will have the correct
// semantics from that point onward. It is always _legal_ to deoptimize (so
// replacing %cmp0 with false is "correct"), though it may not always be
// profitable to do so.
//
// NB! This pass is a work in progress. It hasn't been tuned to be "production
// ready" yet. It is known to have quadriatic running time and will not scale
// to large numbers of guards
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar/GuardWidening.h"
#include "llvm/Pass.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/DenseMap.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/DepthFirstIterator.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopInfo.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/PostDominators.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/ValueTracking.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Dominators.h"
#include "llvm/IR/IntrinsicInst.h"
#include "llvm/IR/PatternMatch.h"
#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
#include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar.h"
using namespace llvm;
#define DEBUG_TYPE "guard-widening"
namespace {
class GuardWideningImpl {
DominatorTree &DT;
PostDominatorTree &PDT;
LoopInfo &LI;
/// The set of guards whose conditions have been widened into dominating
/// guards.
SmallVector<IntrinsicInst *, 16> EliminatedGuards;
/// The set of guards which have been widened to include conditions to other
/// guards.
DenseSet<IntrinsicInst *> WidenedGuards;
/// Try to eliminate guard \p Guard by widening it into an earlier dominating
/// guard. \p DFSI is the DFS iterator on the dominator tree that is
/// currently visiting the block containing \p Guard, and \p GuardsPerBlock
/// maps BasicBlocks to the set of guards seen in that block.
bool eliminateGuardViaWidening(
IntrinsicInst *Guard, const df_iterator<DomTreeNode *> &DFSI,
const DenseMap<BasicBlock *, SmallVector<IntrinsicInst *, 8>> &
GuardsPerBlock);
/// Used to keep track of which widening potential is more effective.
enum WideningScore {
/// Don't widen.
WS_IllegalOrNegative,
/// Widening is performance neutral as far as the cycles spent in check
/// conditions goes (but can still help, e.g., code layout, having less
/// deopt state).
WS_Neutral,
/// Widening is profitable.
WS_Positive,
/// Widening is very profitable. Not significantly different from \c
/// WS_Positive, except by the order.
WS_VeryPositive
};
static StringRef scoreTypeToString(WideningScore WS);
/// Compute the score for widening the condition in \p DominatedGuard
/// (contained in \p DominatedGuardLoop) into \p DominatingGuard (contained in
/// \p DominatingGuardLoop).
WideningScore computeWideningScore(IntrinsicInst *DominatedGuard,
Loop *DominatedGuardLoop,
IntrinsicInst *DominatingGuard,
Loop *DominatingGuardLoop);
/// Helper to check if \p V can be hoisted to \p InsertPos.
bool isAvailableAt(Value *V, Instruction *InsertPos) {
SmallPtrSet<Instruction *, 8> Visited;
return isAvailableAt(V, InsertPos, Visited);
}
bool isAvailableAt(Value *V, Instruction *InsertPos,
SmallPtrSetImpl<Instruction *> &Visited);
/// Helper to hoist \p V to \p InsertPos. Guaranteed to succeed if \c
/// isAvailableAt returned true.
void makeAvailableAt(Value *V, Instruction *InsertPos);
/// Common helper used by \c widenGuard and \c isWideningCondProfitable. Try
/// to generate an expression computing the logical AND of \p Cond0 and \p
/// Cond1. Return true if the expression computing the AND is only as
/// expensive as computing one of the two. If \p InsertPt is true then
/// actually generate the resulting expression, make it available at \p
/// InsertPt and return it in \p Result (else no change to the IR is made).
bool widenCondCommon(Value *Cond0, Value *Cond1, Instruction *InsertPt,
Value *&Result);
/// Represents a range check of the form \c Base + \c Offset u< \c Length,
/// with the constraint that \c Length is not negative. \c CheckInst is the
/// pre-existing instruction in the IR that computes the result of this range
/// check.
class RangeCheck {
Value *Base;
ConstantInt *Offset;
Value *Length;
ICmpInst *CheckInst;
public:
explicit RangeCheck(Value *Base, ConstantInt *Offset, Value *Length,
ICmpInst *CheckInst)
: Base(Base), Offset(Offset), Length(Length), CheckInst(CheckInst) {}
void setBase(Value *NewBase) { Base = NewBase; }
void setOffset(ConstantInt *NewOffset) { Offset = NewOffset; }
Value *getBase() const { return Base; }
ConstantInt *getOffset() const { return Offset; }
const APInt &getOffsetValue() const { return getOffset()->getValue(); }
Value *getLength() const { return Length; };
ICmpInst *getCheckInst() const { return CheckInst; }
void print(raw_ostream &OS, bool PrintTypes = false) {
OS << "Base: ";
Base->printAsOperand(OS, PrintTypes);
OS << " Offset: ";
Offset->printAsOperand(OS, PrintTypes);
OS << " Length: ";
Length->printAsOperand(OS, PrintTypes);
}
LLVM_DUMP_METHOD void dump() {
print(dbgs());
dbgs() << "\n";
}
};
/// Parse \p CheckCond into a conjunction (logical-and) of range checks; and
/// append them to \p Checks. Returns true on success, may clobber \c Checks
/// on failure.
bool parseRangeChecks(Value *CheckCond, SmallVectorImpl<RangeCheck> &Checks) {
SmallPtrSet<Value *, 8> Visited;
return parseRangeChecks(CheckCond, Checks, Visited);
}
bool parseRangeChecks(Value *CheckCond, SmallVectorImpl<RangeCheck> &Checks,
SmallPtrSetImpl<Value *> &Visited);
/// Combine the checks in \p Checks into a smaller set of checks and append
/// them into \p CombinedChecks. Return true on success (i.e. all of checks
/// in \p Checks were combined into \p CombinedChecks). Clobbers \p Checks
/// and \p CombinedChecks on success and on failure.
bool combineRangeChecks(SmallVectorImpl<RangeCheck> &Checks,
SmallVectorImpl<RangeCheck> &CombinedChecks);
/// Can we compute the logical AND of \p Cond0 and \p Cond1 for the price of
/// computing only one of the two expressions?
bool isWideningCondProfitable(Value *Cond0, Value *Cond1) {
Value *ResultUnused;
return widenCondCommon(Cond0, Cond1, /*InsertPt=*/nullptr, ResultUnused);
}
/// Widen \p ToWiden to fail if \p NewCondition is false (in addition to
/// whatever it is already checking).
void widenGuard(IntrinsicInst *ToWiden, Value *NewCondition) {
Value *Result;
widenCondCommon(ToWiden->getArgOperand(0), NewCondition, ToWiden, Result);
ToWiden->setArgOperand(0, Result);
}
public:
explicit GuardWideningImpl(DominatorTree &DT, PostDominatorTree &PDT,
LoopInfo &LI)
: DT(DT), PDT(PDT), LI(LI) {}
/// The entry point for this pass.
bool run();
};
struct GuardWideningLegacyPass : public FunctionPass {
static char ID;
GuardWideningPass Impl;
GuardWideningLegacyPass() : FunctionPass(ID) {
initializeGuardWideningLegacyPassPass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry());
}
bool runOnFunction(Function &F) override {
if (skipFunction(F))
return false;
return GuardWideningImpl(
getAnalysis<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>().getDomTree(),
getAnalysis<PostDominatorTreeWrapperPass>().getPostDomTree(),
getAnalysis<LoopInfoWrapperPass>().getLoopInfo()).run();
}
void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const override {
AU.setPreservesCFG();
AU.addRequired<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>();
AU.addRequired<PostDominatorTreeWrapperPass>();
AU.addRequired<LoopInfoWrapperPass>();
}
};
}
bool GuardWideningImpl::run() {
using namespace llvm::PatternMatch;
DenseMap<BasicBlock *, SmallVector<IntrinsicInst *, 8>> GuardsInBlock;
bool Changed = false;
for (auto DFI = df_begin(DT.getRootNode()), DFE = df_end(DT.getRootNode());
DFI != DFE; ++DFI) {
auto *BB = (*DFI)->getBlock();
auto &CurrentList = GuardsInBlock[BB];
for (auto &I : *BB)
if (match(&I, m_Intrinsic<Intrinsic::experimental_guard>()))
CurrentList.push_back(cast<IntrinsicInst>(&I));
for (auto *II : CurrentList)
Changed |= eliminateGuardViaWidening(II, DFI, GuardsInBlock);
}
for (auto *II : EliminatedGuards)
if (!WidenedGuards.count(II))
II->eraseFromParent();
return Changed;
}
bool GuardWideningImpl::eliminateGuardViaWidening(
IntrinsicInst *GuardInst, const df_iterator<DomTreeNode *> &DFSI,
const DenseMap<BasicBlock *, SmallVector<IntrinsicInst *, 8>> &
GuardsInBlock) {
IntrinsicInst *BestSoFar = nullptr;
auto BestScoreSoFar = WS_IllegalOrNegative;
auto *GuardInstLoop = LI.getLoopFor(GuardInst->getParent());
// In the set of dominating guards, find the one we can merge GuardInst with
// for the most profit.
for (unsigned i = 0, e = DFSI.getPathLength(); i != e; ++i) {
auto *CurBB = DFSI.getPath(i)->getBlock();
auto *CurLoop = LI.getLoopFor(CurBB);
assert(GuardsInBlock.count(CurBB) && "Must have been populated by now!");
const auto &GuardsInCurBB = GuardsInBlock.find(CurBB)->second;
auto I = GuardsInCurBB.begin();
auto E = GuardsInCurBB.end();
#ifndef NDEBUG
{
unsigned Index = 0;
for (auto &I : *CurBB) {
if (Index == GuardsInCurBB.size())
break;
if (GuardsInCurBB[Index] == &I)
Index++;
}
assert(Index == GuardsInCurBB.size() &&
"Guards expected to be in order!");
}
#endif
assert((i == (e - 1)) == (GuardInst->getParent() == CurBB) && "Bad DFS?");
if (i == (e - 1)) {
// Corner case: make sure we're only looking at guards strictly dominating
// GuardInst when visiting GuardInst->getParent().
auto NewEnd = std::find(I, E, GuardInst);
assert(NewEnd != E && "GuardInst not in its own block?");
E = NewEnd;
}
for (auto *Candidate : make_range(I, E)) {
auto Score =
computeWideningScore(GuardInst, GuardInstLoop, Candidate, CurLoop);
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Score between " << *GuardInst->getArgOperand(0)
<< " and " << *Candidate->getArgOperand(0) << " is "
<< scoreTypeToString(Score) << "\n");
if (Score > BestScoreSoFar) {
BestScoreSoFar = Score;
BestSoFar = Candidate;
}
}
}
if (BestScoreSoFar == WS_IllegalOrNegative) {
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Did not eliminate guard " << *GuardInst << "\n");
return false;
}
assert(BestSoFar != GuardInst && "Should have never visited same guard!");
assert(DT.dominates(BestSoFar, GuardInst) && "Should be!");
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Widening " << *GuardInst << " into " << *BestSoFar
<< " with score " << scoreTypeToString(BestScoreSoFar) << "\n");
widenGuard(BestSoFar, GuardInst->getArgOperand(0));
GuardInst->setArgOperand(0, ConstantInt::getTrue(GuardInst->getContext()));
EliminatedGuards.push_back(GuardInst);
WidenedGuards.insert(BestSoFar);
return true;
}
GuardWideningImpl::WideningScore GuardWideningImpl::computeWideningScore(
IntrinsicInst *DominatedGuard, Loop *DominatedGuardLoop,
IntrinsicInst *DominatingGuard, Loop *DominatingGuardLoop) {
bool HoistingOutOfLoop = false;
if (DominatingGuardLoop != DominatedGuardLoop) {
if (DominatingGuardLoop &&
!DominatingGuardLoop->contains(DominatedGuardLoop))
return WS_IllegalOrNegative;
HoistingOutOfLoop = true;
}
if (!isAvailableAt(DominatedGuard->getArgOperand(0), DominatingGuard))
return WS_IllegalOrNegative;
bool HoistingOutOfIf =
!PDT.dominates(DominatedGuard->getParent(), DominatingGuard->getParent());
if (isWideningCondProfitable(DominatedGuard->getArgOperand(0),
DominatingGuard->getArgOperand(0)))
return HoistingOutOfLoop ? WS_VeryPositive : WS_Positive;
if (HoistingOutOfLoop)
return WS_Positive;
return HoistingOutOfIf ? WS_IllegalOrNegative : WS_Neutral;
}
bool GuardWideningImpl::isAvailableAt(Value *V, Instruction *Loc,
SmallPtrSetImpl<Instruction *> &Visited) {
auto *Inst = dyn_cast<Instruction>(V);
if (!Inst || DT.dominates(Inst, Loc) || Visited.count(Inst))
return true;
if (!isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute(Inst, Loc, &DT) ||
Inst->mayReadFromMemory())
return false;
Visited.insert(Inst);
// We only want to go _up_ the dominance chain when recursing.
assert(!isa<PHINode>(Loc) &&
"PHIs should return false for isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute");
assert(DT.isReachableFromEntry(Inst->getParent()) &&
"We did a DFS from the block entry!");
return all_of(Inst->operands(),
[&](Value *Op) { return isAvailableAt(Op, Loc, Visited); });
}
void GuardWideningImpl::makeAvailableAt(Value *V, Instruction *Loc) {
auto *Inst = dyn_cast<Instruction>(V);
if (!Inst || DT.dominates(Inst, Loc))
return;
assert(isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute(Inst, Loc, &DT) &&
!Inst->mayReadFromMemory() && "Should've checked with isAvailableAt!");
for (Value *Op : Inst->operands())
makeAvailableAt(Op, Loc);
Inst->moveBefore(Loc);
}
bool GuardWideningImpl::widenCondCommon(Value *Cond0, Value *Cond1,
Instruction *InsertPt, Value *&Result) {
using namespace llvm::PatternMatch;
{
// L >u C0 && L >u C1 -> L >u max(C0, C1)
ConstantInt *RHS0, *RHS1;
Value *LHS;
ICmpInst::Predicate Pred0, Pred1;
if (match(Cond0, m_ICmp(Pred0, m_Value(LHS), m_ConstantInt(RHS0))) &&
match(Cond1, m_ICmp(Pred1, m_Specific(LHS), m_ConstantInt(RHS1)))) {
ConstantRange CR0 =
ConstantRange::makeExactICmpRegion(Pred0, RHS0->getValue());
ConstantRange CR1 =
ConstantRange::makeExactICmpRegion(Pred1, RHS1->getValue());
// SubsetIntersect is a subset of the actual mathematical intersection of
// CR0 and CR1, while SupersetIntersect is a superset of the actual
// mathematical intersection. If these two ConstantRanges are equal, then
// we know we were able to represent the actual mathematical intersection
// of CR0 and CR1, and can use the same to generate an icmp instruction.
//
// Given what we're doing here and the semantics of guards, it would
// actually be correct to just use SubsetIntersect, but that may be too
// aggressive in cases we care about.
auto SubsetIntersect = CR0.inverse().unionWith(CR1.inverse()).inverse();
auto SupersetIntersect = CR0.intersectWith(CR1);
APInt NewRHSAP;
CmpInst::Predicate Pred;
if (SubsetIntersect == SupersetIntersect &&
SubsetIntersect.getEquivalentICmp(Pred, NewRHSAP)) {
if (InsertPt) {
ConstantInt *NewRHS = ConstantInt::get(Cond0->getContext(), NewRHSAP);
Result = new ICmpInst(InsertPt, Pred, LHS, NewRHS, "wide.chk");
}
return true;
}
}
}
{
SmallVector<GuardWideningImpl::RangeCheck, 4> Checks, CombinedChecks;
if (parseRangeChecks(Cond0, Checks) && parseRangeChecks(Cond1, Checks) &&
combineRangeChecks(Checks, CombinedChecks)) {
if (InsertPt) {
Result = nullptr;
for (auto &RC : CombinedChecks) {
makeAvailableAt(RC.getCheckInst(), InsertPt);
if (Result)
Result = BinaryOperator::CreateAnd(RC.getCheckInst(), Result, "",
InsertPt);
else
Result = RC.getCheckInst();
}
Result->setName("wide.chk");
}
return true;
}
}
// Base case -- just logical-and the two conditions together.
if (InsertPt) {
makeAvailableAt(Cond0, InsertPt);
makeAvailableAt(Cond1, InsertPt);
Result = BinaryOperator::CreateAnd(Cond0, Cond1, "wide.chk", InsertPt);
}
// We were not able to compute Cond0 AND Cond1 for the price of one.
return false;
}
bool GuardWideningImpl::parseRangeChecks(
Value *CheckCond, SmallVectorImpl<GuardWideningImpl::RangeCheck> &Checks,
SmallPtrSetImpl<Value *> &Visited) {
if (!Visited.insert(CheckCond).second)
return true;
using namespace llvm::PatternMatch;
{
Value *AndLHS, *AndRHS;
if (match(CheckCond, m_And(m_Value(AndLHS), m_Value(AndRHS))))
return parseRangeChecks(AndLHS, Checks) &&
parseRangeChecks(AndRHS, Checks);
}
auto *IC = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(CheckCond);
if (!IC || !IC->getOperand(0)->getType()->isIntegerTy() ||
(IC->getPredicate() != ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT &&
IC->getPredicate() != ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT))
return false;
Value *CmpLHS = IC->getOperand(0), *CmpRHS = IC->getOperand(1);
if (IC->getPredicate() == ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT)
std::swap(CmpLHS, CmpRHS);
auto &DL = IC->getModule()->getDataLayout();
GuardWideningImpl::RangeCheck Check(
CmpLHS, cast<ConstantInt>(ConstantInt::getNullValue(CmpRHS->getType())),
CmpRHS, IC);
if (!isKnownNonNegative(Check.getLength(), DL))
return false;
// What we have in \c Check now is a correct interpretation of \p CheckCond.
// Try to see if we can move some constant offsets into the \c Offset field.
bool Changed;
auto &Ctx = CheckCond->getContext();
do {
Value *OpLHS;
ConstantInt *OpRHS;
Changed = false;
#ifndef NDEBUG
auto *BaseInst = dyn_cast<Instruction>(Check.getBase());
assert((!BaseInst || DT.isReachableFromEntry(BaseInst->getParent())) &&
"Unreachable instruction?");
#endif
if (match(Check.getBase(), m_Add(m_Value(OpLHS), m_ConstantInt(OpRHS)))) {
Check.setBase(OpLHS);
APInt NewOffset = Check.getOffsetValue() + OpRHS->getValue();
Check.setOffset(ConstantInt::get(Ctx, NewOffset));
Changed = true;
} else if (match(Check.getBase(),
m_Or(m_Value(OpLHS), m_ConstantInt(OpRHS)))) {
unsigned BitWidth = OpLHS->getType()->getScalarSizeInBits();
APInt KnownZero(BitWidth, 0), KnownOne(BitWidth, 0);
computeKnownBits(OpLHS, KnownZero, KnownOne, DL);
if ((OpRHS->getValue() & KnownZero) == OpRHS->getValue()) {
Check.setBase(OpLHS);
APInt NewOffset = Check.getOffsetValue() + OpRHS->getValue();
Check.setOffset(ConstantInt::get(Ctx, NewOffset));
Changed = true;
}
}
} while (Changed);
Checks.push_back(Check);
return true;
}
bool GuardWideningImpl::combineRangeChecks(
SmallVectorImpl<GuardWideningImpl::RangeCheck> &Checks,
SmallVectorImpl<GuardWideningImpl::RangeCheck> &RangeChecksOut) {
unsigned OldCount = Checks.size();
while (!Checks.empty()) {
// Pick all of the range checks with a specific base and length, and try to
// merge them.
Value *CurrentBase = Checks.front().getBase();
Value *CurrentLength = Checks.front().getLength();
SmallVector<GuardWideningImpl::RangeCheck, 3> CurrentChecks;
auto IsCurrentCheck = [&](GuardWideningImpl::RangeCheck &RC) {
return RC.getBase() == CurrentBase && RC.getLength() == CurrentLength;
};
std::copy_if(Checks.begin(), Checks.end(),
std::back_inserter(CurrentChecks), IsCurrentCheck);
Checks.erase(remove_if(Checks, IsCurrentCheck), Checks.end());
assert(CurrentChecks.size() != 0 && "We know we have at least one!");
if (CurrentChecks.size() < 3) {
RangeChecksOut.insert(RangeChecksOut.end(), CurrentChecks.begin(),
CurrentChecks.end());
continue;
}
// CurrentChecks.size() will typically be 3 here, but so far there has been
// no need to hard-code that fact.
std::sort(CurrentChecks.begin(), CurrentChecks.end(),
[&](const GuardWideningImpl::RangeCheck &LHS,
const GuardWideningImpl::RangeCheck &RHS) {
return LHS.getOffsetValue().slt(RHS.getOffsetValue());
});
// Note: std::sort should not invalidate the ChecksStart iterator.
ConstantInt *MinOffset = CurrentChecks.front().getOffset(),
*MaxOffset = CurrentChecks.back().getOffset();
unsigned BitWidth = MaxOffset->getValue().getBitWidth();
if ((MaxOffset->getValue() - MinOffset->getValue())
.ugt(APInt::getSignedMinValue(BitWidth)))
return false;
APInt MaxDiff = MaxOffset->getValue() - MinOffset->getValue();
const APInt &HighOffset = MaxOffset->getValue();
auto OffsetOK = [&](const GuardWideningImpl::RangeCheck &RC) {
return (HighOffset - RC.getOffsetValue()).ult(MaxDiff);
};
if (MaxDiff.isMinValue() ||
!std::all_of(std::next(CurrentChecks.begin()), CurrentChecks.end(),
OffsetOK))
return false;
// We have a series of f+1 checks as:
//
// I+k_0 u< L ... Chk_0
// I_k_1 u< L ... Chk_1
// ...
// I_k_f u< L ... Chk_(f+1)
//
// with forall i in [0,f): k_f-k_i u< k_f-k_0 ... Precond_0
// k_f-k_0 u< INT_MIN+k_f ... Precond_1
// k_f != k_0 ... Precond_2
//
// Claim:
// Chk_0 AND Chk_(f+1) implies all the other checks
//
// Informal proof sketch:
//
// We will show that the integer range [I+k_0,I+k_f] does not unsigned-wrap
// (i.e. going from I+k_0 to I+k_f does not cross the -1,0 boundary) and
// thus I+k_f is the greatest unsigned value in that range.
//
// This combined with Ckh_(f+1) shows that everything in that range is u< L.
// Via Precond_0 we know that all of the indices in Chk_0 through Chk_(f+1)
// lie in [I+k_0,I+k_f], this proving our claim.
//
// To see that [I+k_0,I+k_f] is not a wrapping range, note that there are
// two possibilities: I+k_0 u< I+k_f or I+k_0 >u I+k_f (they can't be equal
// since k_0 != k_f). In the former case, [I+k_0,I+k_f] is not a wrapping
// range by definition, and the latter case is impossible:
//
// 0-----I+k_f---I+k_0----L---INT_MAX,INT_MIN------------------(-1)
// xxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
//
// For Chk_0 to succeed, we'd have to have k_f-k_0 (the range highlighted
// with 'x' above) to be at least >u INT_MIN.
RangeChecksOut.emplace_back(CurrentChecks.front());
RangeChecksOut.emplace_back(CurrentChecks.back());
}
assert(RangeChecksOut.size() <= OldCount && "We pessimized!");
return RangeChecksOut.size() != OldCount;
}
PreservedAnalyses GuardWideningPass::run(Function &F,
FunctionAnalysisManager &AM) {
auto &DT = AM.getResult<DominatorTreeAnalysis>(F);
auto &LI = AM.getResult<LoopAnalysis>(F);
auto &PDT = AM.getResult<PostDominatorTreeAnalysis>(F);
bool Changed = GuardWideningImpl(DT, PDT, LI).run();
return Changed ? PreservedAnalyses::none() : PreservedAnalyses::all();
}
StringRef GuardWideningImpl::scoreTypeToString(WideningScore WS) {
switch (WS) {
case WS_IllegalOrNegative:
return "IllegalOrNegative";
case WS_Neutral:
return "Neutral";
case WS_Positive:
return "Positive";
case WS_VeryPositive:
return "VeryPositive";
}
llvm_unreachable("Fully covered switch above!");
}
char GuardWideningLegacyPass::ID = 0;
INITIALIZE_PASS_BEGIN(GuardWideningLegacyPass, "guard-widening", "Widen guards",
false, false)
INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(DominatorTreeWrapperPass)
INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(PostDominatorTreeWrapperPass)
INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(LoopInfoWrapperPass)
INITIALIZE_PASS_END(GuardWideningLegacyPass, "guard-widening", "Widen guards",
false, false)
FunctionPass *llvm::createGuardWideningPass() {
return new GuardWideningLegacyPass();
}
Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink