![]() C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned. As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do. This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926 |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
class.directory_entry | ||
class.directory_iterator | ||
class.file_status | ||
class.filesystem_error | ||
class.path | ||
class.rec.dir.itr | ||
fs.enum | ||
fs.error.report | ||
fs.filesystem.synopsis | ||
fs.op.funcs | ||
fs.req.macros | ||
fs.req.namespace | ||
lit.local.cfg |