![]() C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned. As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do. This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926 |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
arithmetic.operations | ||
bind/func.bind | ||
bitwise.operations | ||
comparisons | ||
func.def | ||
func.invoke | ||
func.memfn | ||
func.not_fn | ||
func.require | ||
func.search | ||
func.wrap | ||
logical.operations | ||
negators | ||
refwrap | ||
unord.hash |