![]() C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned. As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do. This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926 |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
arrow.pass.cpp | ||
dereference.pass.cpp | ||
op_arrow.fail.cpp | ||
op_bool.pass.cpp | ||
op_bracket.fail.cpp | ||
op_bracket.pass.cpp | ||
owner_before_shared_ptr.pass.cpp | ||
owner_before_weak_ptr.pass.cpp | ||
unique.pass.cpp |