![]() It was requested in D84173 thread to not do it, because otherwise we extract and check the name of the symbol table in LLVM style, but do not use it and might report a warning which perhaps might be confusing. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84231 |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
COFF | ||
ELF | ||
MachO | ||
wasm | ||
archive.test | ||
basic.test | ||
thin-archive.test |