![]() C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned. As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do. This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926 |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
assign_copy.pass.cpp | ||
assign_move.pass.cpp | ||
emplace.pass.cpp | ||
empty.pass.cpp | ||
empty.verify.cpp | ||
pop.pass.cpp | ||
push.pass.cpp | ||
push_rv.pass.cpp | ||
size.pass.cpp | ||
swap.pass.cpp | ||
top.pass.cpp | ||
top_const.pass.cpp | ||
types.compile.fail.cpp | ||
types.pass.cpp |