This is mostly stylistic cleanup after D100226, but not entirely. When skimming the code, I found one case where we weren't accounting for attributes on the callsite at all. I'm also suspicious we had some latent bugs related to operand bundles (which are supposed to be able to *override* attributes on declarations), but I don't have concrete test cases for those, just suspicions.
Aside: The only case left in the file which directly checks attributes on the declaration is the norecurse logic. I left that because I didn't understand it; it looks obviously wrong, so I suspect I'm misinterpreting the intended semantics of the attribute.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100689
3c54762226