llvm-project/libcxx/test/std/numerics/numeric.ops
Michal Gorny 87ae6bf80b [libc++] [test] Use std::nextafter() instead of std::nexttoward()
Use std::nextafter() instead of std::nexttoward() in midpoint tests.
In the context of this test, this should not cause any difference.
Since nexttowardl() is not implemented on NetBSD 8, the latter function
combined with 'long double' type caused test failure.  nextafterl() does
not have this problem.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61748

llvm-svn: 360673
2019-05-14 13:56:20 +00:00
..
accumulate Support tests in freestanding 2019-02-04 20:31:13 +00:00
adjacent.difference Support tests in freestanding 2019-02-04 20:31:13 +00:00
exclusive.scan Support tests in freestanding 2019-02-04 20:31:13 +00:00
inclusive.scan Support tests in freestanding 2019-02-04 20:31:13 +00:00
inner.product Support tests in freestanding 2019-02-04 20:31:13 +00:00
numeric.iota Support tests in freestanding 2019-02-04 20:31:13 +00:00
numeric.ops.gcd Support tests in freestanding 2019-02-04 20:31:13 +00:00
numeric.ops.lcm Support tests in freestanding 2019-02-04 20:31:13 +00:00
numeric.ops.midpoint [libc++] [test] Use std::nextafter() instead of std::nexttoward() 2019-05-14 13:56:20 +00:00
partial.sum Support tests in freestanding 2019-02-04 20:31:13 +00:00
reduce Support tests in freestanding 2019-02-04 20:31:13 +00:00
transform.exclusive.scan Support tests in freestanding 2019-02-04 20:31:13 +00:00
transform.inclusive.scan Support tests in freestanding 2019-02-04 20:31:13 +00:00
transform.reduce Support tests in freestanding 2019-02-04 20:31:13 +00:00