![]() Creating a function pointer with proper parameters pointing to std::next() or std::prev() should work. This change moves the invented paramater for enable_if over to the return type to resolve this QoI issue. Patch by Jason Liu. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34649 llvm-svn: 308932 |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
advance.pass.cpp | ||
distance.pass.cpp | ||
next.pass.cpp | ||
prev.pass.cpp |