31cbe0f240
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned. As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do. This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| copy.pass.cpp | ||
| default.pass.cpp | ||
| gslice_array.pass.cpp | ||
| indirect_array.pass.cpp | ||
| initializer_list.pass.cpp | ||
| mask_array.pass.cpp | ||
| move.pass.cpp | ||
| pointer_size.pass.cpp | ||
| size.pass.cpp | ||
| slice_array.pass.cpp | ||
| value_size.pass.cpp | ||