![]() C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned. As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do. This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926 |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
is_base_of.pass.cpp | ||
is_base_of_union.pass.cpp | ||
is_convertible.pass.cpp | ||
is_convertible_fallback.pass.cpp | ||
is_invocable.pass.cpp | ||
is_nothrow_convertible.pass.cpp | ||
is_nothrow_invocable.pass.cpp | ||
is_same.pass.cpp |