31cbe0f240
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned. As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do. This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| tuple.include.array.pass.cpp | ||
| tuple.include.utility.pass.cpp | ||
| tuple_element.fail.cpp | ||
| tuple_element.pass.cpp | ||
| tuple_size.fail.cpp | ||
| tuple_size.pass.cpp | ||
| tuple_size_incomplete.fail.cpp | ||
| tuple_size_incomplete.pass.cpp | ||
| tuple_size_structured_bindings.pass.cpp | ||
| tuple_size_v.fail.cpp | ||
| tuple_size_v.pass.cpp | ||
| tuple_size_value_sfinae.pass.cpp | ||