491 lines
19 KiB
C++
491 lines
19 KiB
C++
//===- AffineScalarReplacement.cpp - Affine scalar replacement pass -------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// This file implements a pass to forward affine memref stores to loads, thereby
|
|
// potentially getting rid of intermediate memrefs entirely. It also removes
|
|
// redundant loads.
|
|
// TODO: In the future, similar techniques could be used to eliminate
|
|
// dead memref store's and perform more complex forwarding when support for
|
|
// SSA scalars live out of 'affine.for'/'affine.if' statements is available.
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
#include "PassDetail.h"
|
|
#include "mlir/Analysis/AffineAnalysis.h"
|
|
#include "mlir/Analysis/Utils.h"
|
|
#include "mlir/Dialect/Affine/IR/AffineOps.h"
|
|
#include "mlir/Dialect/Affine/Passes.h"
|
|
#include "mlir/Dialect/MemRef/IR/MemRef.h"
|
|
#include "mlir/Dialect/StandardOps/IR/Ops.h"
|
|
#include "mlir/IR/Dominance.h"
|
|
#include "mlir/Support/LogicalResult.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h"
|
|
#include <algorithm>
|
|
|
|
#define DEBUG_TYPE "memref-dataflow-opt"
|
|
|
|
using namespace mlir;
|
|
|
|
namespace {
|
|
// The store to load forwarding and load CSE rely on three conditions:
|
|
//
|
|
// 1) store/load providing a replacement value and load being replaced need to
|
|
// have mathematically equivalent affine access functions (checked after full
|
|
// composition of load/store operands); this implies that they access the same
|
|
// single memref element for all iterations of the common surrounding loop,
|
|
//
|
|
// 2) the store/load op should dominate the load op,
|
|
//
|
|
// 3) no operation that may write to memory read by the load being replaced can
|
|
// occur after executing the instruction (load or store) providing the
|
|
// replacement value and before the load being replaced (thus potentially
|
|
// allowing overwriting the memory read by the load).
|
|
//
|
|
// The above conditions are simple to check, sufficient, and powerful for most
|
|
// cases in practice - they are sufficient, but not necessary --- since they
|
|
// don't reason about loops that are guaranteed to execute at least once or
|
|
// multiple sources to forward from.
|
|
//
|
|
// TODO: more forwarding can be done when support for
|
|
// loop/conditional live-out SSA values is available.
|
|
// TODO: do general dead store elimination for memref's. This pass
|
|
// currently only eliminates the stores only if no other loads/uses (other
|
|
// than dealloc) remain.
|
|
//
|
|
struct AffineScalarReplacement
|
|
: public AffineScalarReplacementBase<AffineScalarReplacement> {
|
|
void runOnFunction() override;
|
|
|
|
LogicalResult forwardStoreToLoad(AffineReadOpInterface loadOp,
|
|
SmallVectorImpl<Operation *> &loadOpsToErase,
|
|
SmallPtrSetImpl<Value> &memrefsToErase,
|
|
DominanceInfo &domInfo);
|
|
|
|
void loadCSE(AffineReadOpInterface loadOp,
|
|
SmallVectorImpl<Operation *> &loadOpsToErase,
|
|
DominanceInfo &domInfo);
|
|
|
|
void findUnusedStore(AffineWriteOpInterface storeOp,
|
|
SmallVectorImpl<Operation *> &storeOpsToErase,
|
|
SmallPtrSetImpl<Value> &memrefsToErase,
|
|
PostDominanceInfo &postDominanceInfo);
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
} // end anonymous namespace
|
|
|
|
/// Creates a pass to perform optimizations relying on memref dataflow such as
|
|
/// store to load forwarding, elimination of dead stores, and dead allocs.
|
|
std::unique_ptr<OperationPass<FuncOp>>
|
|
mlir::createAffineScalarReplacementPass() {
|
|
return std::make_unique<AffineScalarReplacement>();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Ensure that all operations that could be executed after `start`
|
|
/// (noninclusive) and prior to `memOp` (e.g. on a control flow/op path
|
|
/// between the operations) do not have the potential memory effect
|
|
/// `EffectType` on `memOp`. `memOp` is an operation that reads or writes to
|
|
/// a memref. For example, if `EffectType` is MemoryEffects::Write, this method
|
|
/// will check if there is no write to the memory between `start` and `memOp`
|
|
/// that would change the read within `memOp`.
|
|
template <typename EffectType, typename T>
|
|
bool hasNoInterveningEffect(Operation *start, T memOp) {
|
|
|
|
Value memref = memOp.getMemRef();
|
|
bool isOriginalAllocation = memref.getDefiningOp<memref::AllocaOp>() ||
|
|
memref.getDefiningOp<memref::AllocOp>();
|
|
|
|
// A boolean representing whether an intervening operation could have impacted
|
|
// memOp.
|
|
bool hasSideEffect = false;
|
|
|
|
// Check whether the effect on memOp can be caused by a given operation op.
|
|
std::function<void(Operation *)> checkOperation = [&](Operation *op) {
|
|
// If the effect has alreay been found, early exit,
|
|
if (hasSideEffect)
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
if (auto memEffect = dyn_cast<MemoryEffectOpInterface>(op)) {
|
|
SmallVector<MemoryEffects::EffectInstance, 1> effects;
|
|
memEffect.getEffects(effects);
|
|
|
|
bool opMayHaveEffect = false;
|
|
for (auto effect : effects) {
|
|
// If op causes EffectType on a potentially aliasing location for
|
|
// memOp, mark as having the effect.
|
|
if (isa<EffectType>(effect.getEffect())) {
|
|
if (isOriginalAllocation && effect.getValue() &&
|
|
(effect.getValue().getDefiningOp<memref::AllocaOp>() ||
|
|
effect.getValue().getDefiningOp<memref::AllocOp>())) {
|
|
if (effect.getValue() != memref)
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
opMayHaveEffect = true;
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (!opMayHaveEffect)
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
// If the side effect comes from an affine read or write, try to
|
|
// prove the side effecting `op` cannot reach `memOp`.
|
|
if (isa<AffineReadOpInterface, AffineWriteOpInterface>(op)) {
|
|
MemRefAccess srcAccess(op);
|
|
MemRefAccess destAccess(memOp);
|
|
// Dependence analysis is only correct if both ops operate on the same
|
|
// memref.
|
|
if (srcAccess.memref == destAccess.memref) {
|
|
FlatAffineValueConstraints dependenceConstraints;
|
|
|
|
// Number of loops containing the start op and the ending operation.
|
|
unsigned minSurroundingLoops =
|
|
getNumCommonSurroundingLoops(*start, *memOp);
|
|
|
|
// Number of loops containing the operation `op` which has the
|
|
// potential memory side effect and can occur on a path between
|
|
// `start` and `memOp`.
|
|
unsigned nsLoops = getNumCommonSurroundingLoops(*op, *memOp);
|
|
|
|
// For ease, let's consider the case that `op` is a store and we're
|
|
// looking for other potential stores (e.g `op`) that overwrite memory
|
|
// after `start`, and before being read in `memOp`. In this case, we
|
|
// only need to consider other potential stores with depth >
|
|
// minSurrounding loops since `start` would overwrite any store with a
|
|
// smaller number of surrounding loops before.
|
|
unsigned d;
|
|
for (d = nsLoops + 1; d > minSurroundingLoops; d--) {
|
|
DependenceResult result = checkMemrefAccessDependence(
|
|
srcAccess, destAccess, d, &dependenceConstraints,
|
|
/*dependenceComponents=*/nullptr);
|
|
if (hasDependence(result)) {
|
|
hasSideEffect = true;
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// No side effect was seen, simply return.
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
hasSideEffect = true;
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (op->hasTrait<OpTrait::HasRecursiveSideEffects>()) {
|
|
// Recurse into the regions for this op and check whether the internal
|
|
// operations may have the side effect `EffectType` on memOp.
|
|
for (Region ®ion : op->getRegions())
|
|
for (Block &block : region)
|
|
for (Operation &op : block)
|
|
checkOperation(&op);
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Otherwise, conservatively assume generic operations have the effect
|
|
// on the operation
|
|
hasSideEffect = true;
|
|
return;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
// Check all paths from ancestor op `parent` to the operation `to` for the
|
|
// effect. It is known that `to` must be contained within `parent`.
|
|
auto until = [&](Operation *parent, Operation *to) {
|
|
// TODO check only the paths from `parent` to `to`.
|
|
// Currently we fallback and check the entire parent op, rather than
|
|
// just the paths from the parent path, stopping after reaching `to`.
|
|
// This is conservatively correct, but could be made more aggressive.
|
|
assert(parent->isAncestor(to));
|
|
checkOperation(parent);
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
// Check for all paths from operation `from` to operation `untilOp` for the
|
|
// given memory effect.
|
|
std::function<void(Operation *, Operation *)> recur =
|
|
[&](Operation *from, Operation *untilOp) {
|
|
assert(
|
|
from->getParentRegion()->isAncestor(untilOp->getParentRegion()) &&
|
|
"Checking for side effect between two operations without a common "
|
|
"ancestor");
|
|
|
|
// If the operations are in different regions, recursively consider all
|
|
// path from `from` to the parent of `to` and all paths from the parent
|
|
// of `to` to `to`.
|
|
if (from->getParentRegion() != untilOp->getParentRegion()) {
|
|
recur(from, untilOp->getParentOp());
|
|
until(untilOp->getParentOp(), untilOp);
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Now, assuming that `from` and `to` exist in the same region, perform
|
|
// a CFG traversal to check all the relevant operations.
|
|
|
|
// Additional blocks to consider.
|
|
SmallVector<Block *, 2> todoBlocks;
|
|
{
|
|
// First consider the parent block of `from` an check all operations
|
|
// after `from`.
|
|
for (auto iter = ++from->getIterator(), end = from->getBlock()->end();
|
|
iter != end && &*iter != untilOp; ++iter) {
|
|
checkOperation(&*iter);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// If the parent of `from` doesn't contain `to`, add the successors
|
|
// to the list of blocks to check.
|
|
if (untilOp->getBlock() != from->getBlock())
|
|
for (Block *succ : from->getBlock()->getSuccessors())
|
|
todoBlocks.push_back(succ);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
SmallPtrSet<Block *, 4> done;
|
|
// Traverse the CFG until hitting `to`.
|
|
while (todoBlocks.size()) {
|
|
Block *blk = todoBlocks.pop_back_val();
|
|
if (done.count(blk))
|
|
continue;
|
|
done.insert(blk);
|
|
for (auto &op : *blk) {
|
|
if (&op == untilOp)
|
|
break;
|
|
checkOperation(&op);
|
|
if (&op == blk->getTerminator())
|
|
for (Block *succ : blk->getSuccessors())
|
|
todoBlocks.push_back(succ);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
recur(start, memOp);
|
|
return !hasSideEffect;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// This attempts to find stores which have no impact on the final result.
|
|
// A writing op writeA will be eliminated if there exists an op writeB if
|
|
// 1) writeA and writeB have mathematically equivalent affine access functions.
|
|
// 2) writeB postdominates writeA.
|
|
// 3) There is no potential read between writeA and writeB.
|
|
void AffineScalarReplacement::findUnusedStore(
|
|
AffineWriteOpInterface writeA, SmallVectorImpl<Operation *> &opsToErase,
|
|
SmallPtrSetImpl<Value> &memrefsToErase,
|
|
PostDominanceInfo &postDominanceInfo) {
|
|
|
|
for (Operation *user : writeA.getMemRef().getUsers()) {
|
|
// Only consider writing operations.
|
|
auto writeB = dyn_cast<AffineWriteOpInterface>(user);
|
|
if (!writeB)
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
// The operations must be distinct.
|
|
if (writeB == writeA)
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
// Both operations must lie in the same region.
|
|
if (writeB->getParentRegion() != writeA->getParentRegion())
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
// Both operations must write to the same memory.
|
|
MemRefAccess srcAccess(writeB);
|
|
MemRefAccess destAccess(writeA);
|
|
|
|
if (srcAccess != destAccess)
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
// writeB must postdominate writeA.
|
|
if (!postDominanceInfo.postDominates(writeB, writeA))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
// There cannot be an operation which reads from memory between
|
|
// the two writes.
|
|
if (!hasNoInterveningEffect<MemoryEffects::Read>(writeA, writeB))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
opsToErase.push_back(writeA);
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Attempt to eliminate loadOp by replacing it with a value stored into memory
|
|
/// which the load is guaranteed to retrieve. This check involves three
|
|
/// components: 1) The store and load must be on the same location 2) The store
|
|
/// must dominate (and therefore must always occur prior to) the load 3) No
|
|
/// other operations will overwrite the memory loaded between the given load
|
|
/// and store. If such a value exists, the replaced `loadOp` will be added to
|
|
/// `loadOpsToErase` and its memref will be added to `memrefsToErase`.
|
|
LogicalResult AffineScalarReplacement::forwardStoreToLoad(
|
|
AffineReadOpInterface loadOp, SmallVectorImpl<Operation *> &loadOpsToErase,
|
|
SmallPtrSetImpl<Value> &memrefsToErase, DominanceInfo &domInfo) {
|
|
|
|
// The store op candidate for forwarding that satisfies all conditions
|
|
// to replace the load, if any.
|
|
Operation *lastWriteStoreOp = nullptr;
|
|
|
|
for (auto *user : loadOp.getMemRef().getUsers()) {
|
|
auto storeOp = dyn_cast<AffineWriteOpInterface>(user);
|
|
if (!storeOp)
|
|
continue;
|
|
MemRefAccess srcAccess(storeOp);
|
|
MemRefAccess destAccess(loadOp);
|
|
|
|
// 1. Check if the store and the load have mathematically equivalent
|
|
// affine access functions; this implies that they statically refer to the
|
|
// same single memref element. As an example this filters out cases like:
|
|
// store %A[%i0 + 1]
|
|
// load %A[%i0]
|
|
// store %A[%M]
|
|
// load %A[%N]
|
|
// Use the AffineValueMap difference based memref access equality checking.
|
|
if (srcAccess != destAccess)
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
// 2. The store has to dominate the load op to be candidate.
|
|
if (!domInfo.dominates(storeOp, loadOp))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
// 3. Ensure there is no intermediate operation which could replace the
|
|
// value in memory.
|
|
if (!hasNoInterveningEffect<MemoryEffects::Write>(storeOp, loadOp))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
// We now have a candidate for forwarding.
|
|
assert(lastWriteStoreOp == nullptr &&
|
|
"multiple simulataneous replacement stores");
|
|
lastWriteStoreOp = storeOp;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (!lastWriteStoreOp)
|
|
return failure();
|
|
|
|
// Perform the actual store to load forwarding.
|
|
Value storeVal =
|
|
cast<AffineWriteOpInterface>(lastWriteStoreOp).getValueToStore();
|
|
// Check if 2 values have the same shape. This is needed for affine vector
|
|
// loads and stores.
|
|
if (storeVal.getType() != loadOp.getValue().getType())
|
|
return failure();
|
|
loadOp.getValue().replaceAllUsesWith(storeVal);
|
|
// Record the memref for a later sweep to optimize away.
|
|
memrefsToErase.insert(loadOp.getMemRef());
|
|
// Record this to erase later.
|
|
loadOpsToErase.push_back(loadOp);
|
|
return success();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// The load to load forwarding / redundant load elimination is similar to the
|
|
// store to load forwarding.
|
|
// loadA will be be replaced with loadB if:
|
|
// 1) loadA and loadB have mathematically equivalent affine access functions.
|
|
// 2) loadB dominates loadA.
|
|
// 3) There is no write between loadA and loadB.
|
|
void AffineScalarReplacement::loadCSE(
|
|
AffineReadOpInterface loadA, SmallVectorImpl<Operation *> &loadOpsToErase,
|
|
DominanceInfo &domInfo) {
|
|
SmallVector<AffineReadOpInterface, 4> loadCandidates;
|
|
for (auto *user : loadA.getMemRef().getUsers()) {
|
|
auto loadB = dyn_cast<AffineReadOpInterface>(user);
|
|
if (!loadB || loadB == loadA)
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
MemRefAccess srcAccess(loadB);
|
|
MemRefAccess destAccess(loadA);
|
|
|
|
// 1. The accesses have to be to the same location.
|
|
if (srcAccess != destAccess) {
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// 2. The store has to dominate the load op to be candidate.
|
|
if (!domInfo.dominates(loadB, loadA))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
// 3. There is no write between loadA and loadB.
|
|
if (!hasNoInterveningEffect<MemoryEffects::Write>(loadB.getOperation(),
|
|
loadA))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
// Check if two values have the same shape. This is needed for affine vector
|
|
// loads.
|
|
if (loadB.getValue().getType() != loadA.getValue().getType())
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
loadCandidates.push_back(loadB);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Of the legal load candidates, use the one that dominates all others
|
|
// to minimize the subsequent need to loadCSE
|
|
Value loadB;
|
|
for (AffineReadOpInterface option : loadCandidates) {
|
|
if (llvm::all_of(loadCandidates, [&](AffineReadOpInterface depStore) {
|
|
return depStore == option ||
|
|
domInfo.dominates(option.getOperation(),
|
|
depStore.getOperation());
|
|
})) {
|
|
loadB = option.getValue();
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (loadB) {
|
|
loadA.getValue().replaceAllUsesWith(loadB);
|
|
// Record this to erase later.
|
|
loadOpsToErase.push_back(loadA);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void AffineScalarReplacement::runOnFunction() {
|
|
// Only supports single block functions at the moment.
|
|
FuncOp f = getFunction();
|
|
|
|
// Load op's whose results were replaced by those forwarded from stores.
|
|
SmallVector<Operation *, 8> opsToErase;
|
|
|
|
// A list of memref's that are potentially dead / could be eliminated.
|
|
SmallPtrSet<Value, 4> memrefsToErase;
|
|
|
|
auto &domInfo = getAnalysis<DominanceInfo>();
|
|
auto &postDomInfo = getAnalysis<PostDominanceInfo>();
|
|
|
|
// Walk all load's and perform store to load forwarding.
|
|
f.walk([&](AffineReadOpInterface loadOp) {
|
|
if (failed(
|
|
forwardStoreToLoad(loadOp, opsToErase, memrefsToErase, domInfo))) {
|
|
loadCSE(loadOp, opsToErase, domInfo);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Erase all load op's whose results were replaced with store fwd'ed ones.
|
|
for (auto *op : opsToErase)
|
|
op->erase();
|
|
opsToErase.clear();
|
|
|
|
// Walk all store's and perform unused store elimination
|
|
f.walk([&](AffineWriteOpInterface storeOp) {
|
|
findUnusedStore(storeOp, opsToErase, memrefsToErase, postDomInfo);
|
|
});
|
|
// Erase all store op's which don't impact the program
|
|
for (auto *op : opsToErase)
|
|
op->erase();
|
|
|
|
// Check if the store fwd'ed memrefs are now left with only stores and can
|
|
// thus be completely deleted. Note: the canonicalize pass should be able
|
|
// to do this as well, but we'll do it here since we collected these anyway.
|
|
for (auto memref : memrefsToErase) {
|
|
// If the memref hasn't been alloc'ed in this function, skip.
|
|
Operation *defOp = memref.getDefiningOp();
|
|
if (!defOp || !isa<memref::AllocOp>(defOp))
|
|
// TODO: if the memref was returned by a 'call' operation, we
|
|
// could still erase it if the call had no side-effects.
|
|
continue;
|
|
if (llvm::any_of(memref.getUsers(), [&](Operation *ownerOp) {
|
|
return !isa<AffineWriteOpInterface, memref::DeallocOp>(ownerOp);
|
|
}))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
// Erase all stores, the dealloc, and the alloc on the memref.
|
|
for (auto *user : llvm::make_early_inc_range(memref.getUsers()))
|
|
user->erase();
|
|
defOp->erase();
|
|
}
|
|
}
|