OSchip
/
llvm-project
mirror of https://github.com/THU-DSP-LAB/llvm-project.git
13
0
Fork 6
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/AggressiveInstCombine/AggressiveInstCombine.cpp

419 lines
16 KiB
C++
Raw Blame History

//===- AggressiveInstCombine.cpp ------------------------------------------===//
//
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// This file implements the aggressive expression pattern combiner classes.
// Currently, it handles expression patterns for:
// * Truncate instruction
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "llvm/Transforms/AggressiveInstCombine/AggressiveInstCombine.h"
#include "AggressiveInstCombineInternal.h"
#include "llvm-c/Initialization.h"
#include "llvm-c/Transforms/AggressiveInstCombine.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/AliasAnalysis.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/BasicAliasAnalysis.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/GlobalsModRef.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/TargetLibraryInfo.h"
#include "llvm/IR/DataLayout.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Dominators.h"
#include "llvm/IR/IRBuilder.h"
#include "llvm/IR/LegacyPassManager.h"
#include "llvm/IR/PatternMatch.h"
#include "llvm/InitializePasses.h"
#include "llvm/Pass.h"
#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/Local.h"
using namespace llvm;
using namespace PatternMatch;
#define DEBUG_TYPE "aggressive-instcombine"
namespace {
/// Contains expression pattern combiner logic.
/// This class provides both the logic to combine expression patterns and
/// combine them. It differs from InstCombiner class in that each pattern
/// combiner runs only once as opposed to InstCombine's multi-iteration,
/// which allows pattern combiner to have higher complexity than the O(1)
/// required by the instruction combiner.
class AggressiveInstCombinerLegacyPass : public FunctionPass {
public:
static char ID; // Pass identification, replacement for typeid
AggressiveInstCombinerLegacyPass() : FunctionPass(ID) {
initializeAggressiveInstCombinerLegacyPassPass(
*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry());
}
void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const override;
/// Run all expression pattern optimizations on the given /p F function.
///
/// \param F function to optimize.
/// \returns true if the IR is changed.
bool runOnFunction(Function &F) override;
};
} // namespace
/// Match a pattern for a bitwise rotate operation that partially guards
/// against undefined behavior by branching around the rotation when the shift
/// amount is 0.
static bool foldGuardedRotateToFunnelShift(Instruction &I) {
if (I.getOpcode() != Instruction::PHI || I.getNumOperands() != 2)
return false;
// As with the one-use checks below, this is not strictly necessary, but we
// are being cautious to avoid potential perf regressions on targets that
// do not actually have a rotate instruction (where the funnel shift would be
// expanded back into math/shift/logic ops).
if (!isPowerOf2_32(I.getType()->getScalarSizeInBits()))
return false;
// Match V to funnel shift left/right and capture the source operand and
// shift amount in X and Y.
auto matchRotate = [](Value *V, Value *&X, Value *&Y) {
Value *L0, *L1, *R0, *R1;
unsigned Width = V->getType()->getScalarSizeInBits();
auto Sub = m_Sub(m_SpecificInt(Width), m_Value(R1));
// rotate_left(X, Y) == (X << Y) | (X >> (Width - Y))
auto RotL = m_OneUse(
m_c_Or(m_Shl(m_Value(L0), m_Value(L1)), m_LShr(m_Value(R0), Sub)));
if (RotL.match(V) && L0 == R0 && L1 == R1) {
X = L0;
Y = L1;
return Intrinsic::fshl;
}
// rotate_right(X, Y) == (X >> Y) | (X << (Width - Y))
auto RotR = m_OneUse(
m_c_Or(m_LShr(m_Value(L0), m_Value(L1)), m_Shl(m_Value(R0), Sub)));
if (RotR.match(V) && L0 == R0 && L1 == R1) {
X = L0;
Y = L1;
return Intrinsic::fshr;
}
return Intrinsic::not_intrinsic;
};
// One phi operand must be a rotate operation, and the other phi operand must
// be the source value of that rotate operation:
// phi [ rotate(RotSrc, RotAmt), RotBB ], [ RotSrc, GuardBB ]
PHINode &Phi = cast<PHINode>(I);
Value *P0 = Phi.getOperand(0), *P1 = Phi.getOperand(1);
Value *RotSrc, *RotAmt;
Intrinsic::ID IID = matchRotate(P0, RotSrc, RotAmt);
if (IID == Intrinsic::not_intrinsic || RotSrc != P1) {
IID = matchRotate(P1, RotSrc, RotAmt);
if (IID == Intrinsic::not_intrinsic || RotSrc != P0)
return false;
assert((IID == Intrinsic::fshl || IID == Intrinsic::fshr) &&
"Pattern must match funnel shift left or right");
}
// The incoming block with our source operand must be the "guard" block.
// That must contain a cmp+branch to avoid the rotate when the shift amount
// is equal to 0. The other incoming block is the block with the rotate.
BasicBlock *GuardBB = Phi.getIncomingBlock(RotSrc == P1);
BasicBlock *RotBB = Phi.getIncomingBlock(RotSrc != P1);
Instruction *TermI = GuardBB->getTerminator();
ICmpInst::Predicate Pred;
BasicBlock *PhiBB = Phi.getParent();
if (!match(TermI, m_Br(m_ICmp(Pred, m_Specific(RotAmt), m_ZeroInt()),
m_SpecificBB(PhiBB), m_SpecificBB(RotBB))))
return false;
if (Pred != CmpInst::ICMP_EQ)
return false;
// We matched a variation of this IR pattern:
// GuardBB:
// %cmp = icmp eq i32 %RotAmt, 0
// br i1 %cmp, label %PhiBB, label %RotBB
// RotBB:
// %sub = sub i32 32, %RotAmt
// %shr = lshr i32 %X, %sub
// %shl = shl i32 %X, %RotAmt
// %rot = or i32 %shr, %shl
// br label %PhiBB
// PhiBB:
// %cond = phi i32 [ %rot, %RotBB ], [ %X, %GuardBB ]
// -->
// llvm.fshl.i32(i32 %X, i32 %RotAmt)
IRBuilder<> Builder(PhiBB, PhiBB->getFirstInsertionPt());
Function *F = Intrinsic::getDeclaration(Phi.getModule(), IID, Phi.getType());
Phi.replaceAllUsesWith(Builder.CreateCall(F, {RotSrc, RotSrc, RotAmt}));
return true;
}
/// This is used by foldAnyOrAllBitsSet() to capture a source value (Root) and
/// the bit indexes (Mask) needed by a masked compare. If we're matching a chain
/// of 'and' ops, then we also need to capture the fact that we saw an
/// "and X, 1", so that's an extra return value for that case.
struct MaskOps {
Value *Root;
APInt Mask;
bool MatchAndChain;
bool FoundAnd1;
MaskOps(unsigned BitWidth, bool MatchAnds)
: Root(nullptr), Mask(APInt::getNullValue(BitWidth)),
MatchAndChain(MatchAnds), FoundAnd1(false) {}
};
/// This is a recursive helper for foldAnyOrAllBitsSet() that walks through a
/// chain of 'and' or 'or' instructions looking for shift ops of a common source
/// value. Examples:
/// or (or (or X, (X >> 3)), (X >> 5)), (X >> 8)
/// returns { X, 0x129 }
/// and (and (X >> 1), 1), (X >> 4)
/// returns { X, 0x12 }
static bool matchAndOrChain(Value *V, MaskOps &MOps) {
Value *Op0, *Op1;
if (MOps.MatchAndChain) {
// Recurse through a chain of 'and' operands. This requires an extra check
// vs. the 'or' matcher: we must find an "and X, 1" instruction somewhere
// in the chain to know that all of the high bits are cleared.
if (match(V, m_And(m_Value(Op0), m_One()))) {
MOps.FoundAnd1 = true;
return matchAndOrChain(Op0, MOps);
}
if (match(V, m_And(m_Value(Op0), m_Value(Op1))))
return matchAndOrChain(Op0, MOps) && matchAndOrChain(Op1, MOps);
} else {
// Recurse through a chain of 'or' operands.
if (match(V, m_Or(m_Value(Op0), m_Value(Op1))))
return matchAndOrChain(Op0, MOps) && matchAndOrChain(Op1, MOps);
}
// We need a shift-right or a bare value representing a compare of bit 0 of
// the original source operand.
Value *Candidate;
uint64_t BitIndex = 0;
if (!match(V, m_LShr(m_Value(Candidate), m_ConstantInt(BitIndex))))
Candidate = V;
// Initialize result source operand.
if (!MOps.Root)
MOps.Root = Candidate;
// The shift constant is out-of-range? This code hasn't been simplified.
if (BitIndex >= MOps.Mask.getBitWidth())
return false;
// Fill in the mask bit derived from the shift constant.
MOps.Mask.setBit(BitIndex);
return MOps.Root == Candidate;
}
/// Match patterns that correspond to "any-bits-set" and "all-bits-set".
/// These will include a chain of 'or' or 'and'-shifted bits from a
/// common source value:
/// and (or (lshr X, C), ...), 1 --> (X & CMask) != 0
/// and (and (lshr X, C), ...), 1 --> (X & CMask) == CMask
/// Note: "any-bits-clear" and "all-bits-clear" are variations of these patterns
/// that differ only with a final 'not' of the result. We expect that final
/// 'not' to be folded with the compare that we create here (invert predicate).
static bool foldAnyOrAllBitsSet(Instruction &I) {
// The 'any-bits-set' ('or' chain) pattern is simpler to match because the
// final "and X, 1" instruction must be the final op in the sequence.
bool MatchAllBitsSet;
if (match(&I, m_c_And(m_OneUse(m_And(m_Value(), m_Value())), m_Value())))
MatchAllBitsSet = true;
else if (match(&I, m_And(m_OneUse(m_Or(m_Value(), m_Value())), m_One())))
MatchAllBitsSet = false;
else
return false;
MaskOps MOps(I.getType()->getScalarSizeInBits(), MatchAllBitsSet);
if (MatchAllBitsSet) {
if (!matchAndOrChain(cast<BinaryOperator>(&I), MOps) || !MOps.FoundAnd1)
return false;
} else {
if (!matchAndOrChain(cast<BinaryOperator>(&I)->getOperand(0), MOps))
return false;
}
// The pattern was found. Create a masked compare that replaces all of the
// shift and logic ops.
IRBuilder<> Builder(&I);
Constant *Mask = ConstantInt::get(I.getType(), MOps.Mask);
Value *And = Builder.CreateAnd(MOps.Root, Mask);
Value *Cmp = MatchAllBitsSet ? Builder.CreateICmpEQ(And, Mask)
: Builder.CreateIsNotNull(And);
Value *Zext = Builder.CreateZExt(Cmp, I.getType());
I.replaceAllUsesWith(Zext);
return true;
}
// Try to recognize below function as popcount intrinsic.
// This is the "best" algorithm from
// http://graphics.stanford.edu/~seander/bithacks.html#CountBitsSetParallel
// Also used in TargetLowering::expandCTPOP().
//
// int popcount(unsigned int i) {
// i = i - ((i >> 1) & 0x55555555);
// i = (i & 0x33333333) + ((i >> 2) & 0x33333333);
// i = ((i + (i >> 4)) & 0x0F0F0F0F);
// return (i * 0x01010101) >> 24;
// }
static bool tryToRecognizePopCount(Instruction &I) {
if (I.getOpcode() != Instruction::LShr)
return false;
Type *Ty = I.getType();
if (!Ty->isIntOrIntVectorTy())
return false;
unsigned Len = Ty->getScalarSizeInBits();
// FIXME: fix Len == 8 and other irregular type lengths.
if (!(Len <= 128 && Len > 8 && Len % 8 == 0))
return false;
APInt Mask55 = APInt::getSplat(Len, APInt(8, 0x55));
APInt Mask33 = APInt::getSplat(Len, APInt(8, 0x33));
APInt Mask0F = APInt::getSplat(Len, APInt(8, 0x0F));
APInt Mask01 = APInt::getSplat(Len, APInt(8, 0x01));
APInt MaskShift = APInt(Len, Len - 8);
Value *Op0 = I.getOperand(0);
Value *Op1 = I.getOperand(1);
Value *MulOp0;
// Matching "(i * 0x01010101...) >> 24".
if ((match(Op0, m_Mul(m_Value(MulOp0), m_SpecificInt(Mask01)))) &&
match(Op1, m_SpecificInt(MaskShift))) {
Value *ShiftOp0;
// Matching "((i + (i >> 4)) & 0x0F0F0F0F...)".
if (match(MulOp0, m_And(m_c_Add(m_LShr(m_Value(ShiftOp0), m_SpecificInt(4)),
m_Deferred(ShiftOp0)),
m_SpecificInt(Mask0F)))) {
Value *AndOp0;
// Matching "(i & 0x33333333...) + ((i >> 2) & 0x33333333...)".
if (match(ShiftOp0,
m_c_Add(m_And(m_Value(AndOp0), m_SpecificInt(Mask33)),
m_And(m_LShr(m_Deferred(AndOp0), m_SpecificInt(2)),
m_SpecificInt(Mask33))))) {
Value *Root, *SubOp1;
// Matching "i - ((i >> 1) & 0x55555555...)".
if (match(AndOp0, m_Sub(m_Value(Root), m_Value(SubOp1))) &&
match(SubOp1, m_And(m_LShr(m_Specific(Root), m_SpecificInt(1)),
m_SpecificInt(Mask55)))) {
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Recognized popcount intrinsic\n");
IRBuilder<> Builder(&I);
Function *Func = Intrinsic::getDeclaration(
I.getModule(), Intrinsic::ctpop, I.getType());
I.replaceAllUsesWith(Builder.CreateCall(Func, {Root}));
return true;
}
}
}
}
return false;
}
/// This is the entry point for folds that could be implemented in regular
/// InstCombine, but they are separated because they are not expected to
/// occur frequently and/or have more than a constant-length pattern match.
static bool foldUnusualPatterns(Function &F, DominatorTree &DT) {
bool MadeChange = false;
for (BasicBlock &BB : F) {
// Ignore unreachable basic blocks.
if (!DT.isReachableFromEntry(&BB))
continue;
// Do not delete instructions under here and invalidate the iterator.
// Walk the block backwards for efficiency. We're matching a chain of
// use->defs, so we're more likely to succeed by starting from the bottom.
// Also, we want to avoid matching partial patterns.
// TODO: It would be more efficient if we removed dead instructions
// iteratively in this loop rather than waiting until the end.
for (Instruction &I : make_range(BB.rbegin(), BB.rend())) {
MadeChange |= foldAnyOrAllBitsSet(I);
MadeChange |= foldGuardedRotateToFunnelShift(I);
MadeChange |= tryToRecognizePopCount(I);
}
}
// We're done with transforms, so remove dead instructions.
if (MadeChange)
for (BasicBlock &BB : F)
SimplifyInstructionsInBlock(&BB);
return MadeChange;
}
/// This is the entry point for all transforms. Pass manager differences are
/// handled in the callers of this function.
static bool runImpl(Function &F, TargetLibraryInfo &TLI, DominatorTree &DT) {
bool MadeChange = false;
const DataLayout &DL = F.getParent()->getDataLayout();
TruncInstCombine TIC(TLI, DL, DT);
MadeChange |= TIC.run(F);
MadeChange |= foldUnusualPatterns(F, DT);
return MadeChange;
}
void AggressiveInstCombinerLegacyPass::getAnalysisUsage(
AnalysisUsage &AU) const {
AU.setPreservesCFG();
AU.addRequired<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>();
AU.addRequired<TargetLibraryInfoWrapperPass>();
AU.addPreserved<AAResultsWrapperPass>();
AU.addPreserved<BasicAAWrapperPass>();
AU.addPreserved<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>();
AU.addPreserved<GlobalsAAWrapperPass>();
}
bool AggressiveInstCombinerLegacyPass::runOnFunction(Function &F) {
auto &TLI = getAnalysis<TargetLibraryInfoWrapperPass>().getTLI(F);
auto &DT = getAnalysis<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>().getDomTree();
return runImpl(F, TLI, DT);
}
PreservedAnalyses AggressiveInstCombinePass::run(Function &F,
FunctionAnalysisManager &AM) {
auto &TLI = AM.getResult<TargetLibraryAnalysis>(F);
auto &DT = AM.getResult<DominatorTreeAnalysis>(F);
if (!runImpl(F, TLI, DT)) {
// No changes, all analyses are preserved.
return PreservedAnalyses::all();
}
// Mark all the analyses that instcombine updates as preserved.
PreservedAnalyses PA;
PA.preserveSet<CFGAnalyses>();
PA.preserve<AAManager>();
PA.preserve<GlobalsAA>();
return PA;
}
char AggressiveInstCombinerLegacyPass::ID = 0;
INITIALIZE_PASS_BEGIN(AggressiveInstCombinerLegacyPass,
"aggressive-instcombine",
"Combine pattern based expressions", false, false)
INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(DominatorTreeWrapperPass)
INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(TargetLibraryInfoWrapperPass)
INITIALIZE_PASS_END(AggressiveInstCombinerLegacyPass, "aggressive-instcombine",
"Combine pattern based expressions", false, false)
// Initialization Routines
void llvm::initializeAggressiveInstCombine(PassRegistry &Registry) {
initializeAggressiveInstCombinerLegacyPassPass(Registry);
}
void LLVMInitializeAggressiveInstCombiner(LLVMPassRegistryRef R) {
initializeAggressiveInstCombinerLegacyPassPass(*unwrap(R));
}
FunctionPass *llvm::createAggressiveInstCombinerPass() {
return new AggressiveInstCombinerLegacyPass();
}
void LLVMAddAggressiveInstCombinerPass(LLVMPassManagerRef PM) {
unwrap(PM)->add(createAggressiveInstCombinerPass());
}
Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink