174 lines
		
	
	
		
			5.9 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			LLVM
		
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			174 lines
		
	
	
		
			5.9 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			LLVM
		
	
	
	
| ; RUN: opt < %s -loop-interchange -pass-remarks-output=%t -verify-dom-info -verify-loop-info \
 | |
| ; RUN:     -pass-remarks=loop-interchange -pass-remarks-missed=loop-interchange
 | |
| ; RUN: FileCheck -input-file %t %s
 | |
| 
 | |
| ; RUN: opt < %s -loop-interchange -pass-remarks-output=%t -verify-dom-info -verify-loop-info \
 | |
| ; RUN:     -pass-remarks=loop-interchange -pass-remarks-missed=loop-interchange \
 | |
| ; RUN:     -da-disable-delinearization-checks
 | |
| ; RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=DELIN -input-file %t %s
 | |
| 
 | |
| ;; We test profitability model in these test cases.
 | |
| 
 | |
| target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
 | |
| target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
 | |
| 
 | |
| @A = common global [100 x [100 x i32]] zeroinitializer
 | |
| @B = common global [100 x [100 x i32]] zeroinitializer
 | |
| 
 | |
| ;;---------------------------------------Test case 01---------------------------------
 | |
| ;; Loops interchange will result in code vectorization and hence profitable. Check for interchange.
 | |
| ;;   for(int i=1;i<100;i++)
 | |
| ;;     for(int j=1;j<100;j++)
 | |
| ;;       A[j][i] = A[j - 1][i] + B[j][i];
 | |
| 
 | |
| ; CHECK:      Name:            Dependence
 | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT: Function:        interchange_01
 | |
| 
 | |
| ; DELIN:      Name:            Interchanged
 | |
| ; DELIN-NEXT: Function:        interchange_01
 | |
| 
 | |
| define void @interchange_01() {
 | |
| entry:
 | |
|   br label %for2.preheader
 | |
| 
 | |
| for2.preheader:
 | |
|   %i30 = phi i64 [ 1, %entry ], [ %i.next31, %for1.inc14 ]
 | |
|   br label %for2
 | |
| 
 | |
| for2:
 | |
|   %j = phi i64 [ %i.next, %for2 ], [ 1, %for2.preheader ]
 | |
|   %j.prev = add nsw i64 %j,  -1
 | |
|   %arrayidx5 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x [100 x i32]], [100 x [100 x i32]]* @A, i64 0, i64 %j.prev, i64 %i30
 | |
|   %lv1 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx5
 | |
|   %arrayidx9 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x [100 x i32]], [100 x [100 x i32]]* @B, i64 0, i64 %j,  i64 %i30
 | |
|   %lv2 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx9
 | |
|   %add = add nsw i32 %lv1, %lv2
 | |
|   %arrayidx13 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x [100 x i32]], [100 x [100 x i32]]* @A, i64 0, i64 %j,  i64 %i30
 | |
|   store i32 %add, i32* %arrayidx13
 | |
|   %i.next = add nuw nsw i64 %j,  1
 | |
|   %exitcond = icmp eq i64 %j,  99
 | |
|   br i1 %exitcond, label %for1.inc14, label %for2
 | |
| 
 | |
| for1.inc14:
 | |
|   %i.next31 = add nuw nsw i64 %i30, 1
 | |
|   %exitcond33 = icmp eq i64 %i30, 99
 | |
|   br i1 %exitcond33, label %for.end16, label %for2.preheader
 | |
| 
 | |
| for.end16:
 | |
|   ret void
 | |
| }
 | |
| 
 | |
| ;; ---------------------------------------Test case 02---------------------------------
 | |
| ;; Check loop interchange profitability model.
 | |
| ;; This tests profitability model when operands of getelementpointer and not exactly the induction variable but some 
 | |
| ;; arithmetic operation on them.
 | |
| ;;   for(int i=1;i<N;i++)
 | |
| ;;    for(int j=1;j<N;j++)
 | |
| ;;       A[j-1][i-1] = A[j - 1][i-1] + B[j-1][i-1];
 | |
| 
 | |
| ; CHECK:      Name:            Interchanged
 | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT: Function:        interchange_02
 | |
| define void @interchange_02() {
 | |
| entry:
 | |
|   br label %for1.header
 | |
| 
 | |
| for1.header:
 | |
|   %i35 = phi i64 [ 1, %entry ], [ %i.next36, %for1.inc19 ]
 | |
|   %i.prev = add nsw i64 %i35, -1
 | |
|   br label %for2
 | |
| 
 | |
| for2:
 | |
|   %j = phi i64 [ 1, %for1.header ], [ %i.next, %for2 ]
 | |
|   %j.prev = add nsw i64 %j,  -1
 | |
|   %arrayidx6 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x [100 x i32]], [100 x [100 x i32]]* @A, i64 0, i64 %j.prev, i64 %i.prev
 | |
|   %lv1 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx6
 | |
|   %arrayidx12 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x [100 x i32]], [100 x [100 x i32]]* @B, i64 0, i64 %j.prev, i64 %i.prev
 | |
|   %lv2 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx12
 | |
|   %add = add nsw i32 %lv1, %lv2
 | |
|   store i32 %add, i32* %arrayidx6
 | |
|   %i.next = add nuw nsw i64 %j,  1
 | |
|   %exitcond = icmp eq i64 %j,  99
 | |
|   br i1 %exitcond, label %for1.inc19, label %for2
 | |
| 
 | |
| for1.inc19:
 | |
|   %i.next36 = add nuw nsw i64 %i35, 1
 | |
|   %exitcond39 = icmp eq i64 %i35, 99
 | |
|   br i1 %exitcond39, label %for.end21, label %for1.header
 | |
| 
 | |
| for.end21:
 | |
|   ret void
 | |
| }
 | |
| 
 | |
| ;;---------------------------------------Test case 03---------------------------------
 | |
| ;; Loops interchange is not profitable.
 | |
| ;;   for(int i=1;i<100;i++)
 | |
| ;;     for(int j=1;j<100;j++)
 | |
| ;;       A[i-1][j-1] = A[i - 1][j-1] + B[i][j];
 | |
| 
 | |
| ; CHECK:      Name:            InterchangeNotProfitable
 | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT: Function:        interchange_03
 | |
| define void @interchange_03(){
 | |
| entry:
 | |
|   br label %for1.header
 | |
| 
 | |
| for1.header:
 | |
|   %i34 = phi i64 [ 1, %entry ], [ %i.next35, %for1.inc17 ]
 | |
|   %i.prev = add nsw i64 %i34, -1
 | |
|   br label %for2
 | |
| 
 | |
| for2:
 | |
|   %j = phi i64 [ 1, %for1.header ], [ %i.next, %for2 ]
 | |
|   %j.prev = add nsw i64 %j, -1
 | |
|   %arrayidx6 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x [100 x i32]], [100 x [100 x i32]]* @A, i64 0, i64 %i.prev, i64 %j.prev
 | |
|   %lv1 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx6
 | |
|   %arrayidx10 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x [100 x i32]], [100 x [100 x i32]]* @B, i64 0, i64 %i34, i64 %j
 | |
|   %lv2 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx10
 | |
|   %add = add nsw i32 %lv1, %lv2
 | |
|   store i32 %add, i32* %arrayidx6
 | |
|   %i.next = add nuw nsw i64 %j,  1
 | |
|   %exitcond = icmp eq i64 %j,  99
 | |
|   br i1 %exitcond, label %for1.inc17, label %for2
 | |
| 
 | |
| for1.inc17:
 | |
|   %i.next35 = add nuw nsw i64 %i34, 1
 | |
|   %exitcond38 = icmp eq i64 %i34, 99
 | |
|   br i1 %exitcond38, label %for.end19, label %for1.header
 | |
| 
 | |
| for.end19:
 | |
|   ret void
 | |
| }
 | |
| 
 | |
| ;; Loops should not be interchanged in this case as it is not profitable.
 | |
| ;;  for(int i=0;i<100;i++)
 | |
| ;;    for(int j=0;j<100;j++)
 | |
| ;;      A[i][j] = A[i][j]+k;
 | |
| 
 | |
| ; CHECK:      Name:            InterchangeNotProfitable
 | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT: Function:        interchange_04
 | |
| define void @interchange_04(i32 %k) {
 | |
| entry:
 | |
|   br label %for.cond1.preheader
 | |
| 
 | |
| for.cond1.preheader:
 | |
|   %indvars.iv21 = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %indvars.iv.next22, %for.inc10 ]
 | |
|   br label %for.body3
 | |
| 
 | |
| for.body3:
 | |
|   %indvars.iv = phi i64 [ 0, %for.cond1.preheader ], [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body3 ]
 | |
|   %arrayidx5 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x [100 x i32]], [100 x [100 x i32]]* @A, i64 0, i64 %indvars.iv21, i64 %indvars.iv
 | |
|   %0 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx5
 | |
|   %add = add nsw i32 %0, %k
 | |
|   store i32 %add, i32* %arrayidx5
 | |
|   %indvars.iv.next = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1
 | |
|   %exitcond = icmp eq i64 %indvars.iv.next, 100
 | |
|   br i1 %exitcond, label %for.inc10, label %for.body3
 | |
| 
 | |
| for.inc10:
 | |
|   %indvars.iv.next22 = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv21, 1
 | |
|   %exitcond23 = icmp eq i64 %indvars.iv.next22, 100
 | |
|   br i1 %exitcond23, label %for.end12, label %for.cond1.preheader
 | |
| 
 | |
| for.end12:
 | |
|   ret void
 | |
| }
 |