254 lines
		
	
	
		
			9.3 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			ReStructuredText
		
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			254 lines
		
	
	
		
			9.3 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			ReStructuredText
		
	
	
	
| ================================
 | |
| How to submit an LLVM bug report
 | |
| ================================
 | |
| 
 | |
| Introduction - Got bugs?
 | |
| ========================
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you're working with LLVM and run into a bug, we definitely want to know
 | |
| about it.  This document describes what you can do to increase the odds of
 | |
| getting it fixed quickly.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 🔒 If you believe that the bug is security related, please follow :ref:`report-security-issue`. 🔒
 | |
| 
 | |
| Basically you have to do two things at a minimum. First, decide whether the
 | |
| bug `crashes the compiler`_ or if the compiler is `miscompiling`_ the program
 | |
| (i.e., the compiler successfully produces an executable, but it doesn't run
 | |
| right). Based on what type of bug it is, follow the instructions in the
 | |
| linked section to narrow down the bug so that the person who fixes it will be
 | |
| able to find the problem more easily.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Once you have a reduced test-case, go to `the LLVM Bug Tracking System
 | |
| <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues>`_ and fill out the form with the
 | |
| necessary details (note that you don't need to pick a label, just use if you're
 | |
| not sure).  The bug description should contain the following information:
 | |
| 
 | |
| * All information necessary to reproduce the problem.
 | |
| * The reduced test-case that triggers the bug.
 | |
| * The location where you obtained LLVM (if not from our Git
 | |
|   repository).
 | |
| 
 | |
| Thanks for helping us make LLVM better!
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _crashes the compiler:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Crashing Bugs
 | |
| =============
 | |
| 
 | |
| More often than not, bugs in the compiler cause it to crash---often due to
 | |
| an assertion failure of some sort. The most important piece of the puzzle
 | |
| is to figure out if it is crashing in the Clang front-end or if it is one of
 | |
| the LLVM libraries (e.g. the optimizer or code generator) that has
 | |
| problems.
 | |
| 
 | |
| To figure out which component is crashing (the front-end, middle-end
 | |
| optimizer, or backend code generator), run the ``clang`` command line as you
 | |
| were when the crash occurred, but with the following extra command line
 | |
| options:
 | |
| 
 | |
| * ``-emit-llvm -Xclang -disable-llvm-passes``: If ``clang`` still crashes when
 | |
|   passed these options (which disable the optimizer and code generator), then
 | |
|   the crash is in the front-end. Jump ahead to :ref:`front-end bugs
 | |
|   <frontend-crash>`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * ``-emit-llvm``: If ``clang`` crashes with this option (which disables
 | |
|   the code generator), you found a middle-end optimizer bug. Jump ahead to
 | |
|   :ref:`middle-end bugs <middleend-crash>`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Otherwise, you have a backend code generator crash. Jump ahead to :ref:`code
 | |
|   generator bugs <backend-crash>`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _frontend-crash:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Front-end bugs
 | |
| --------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| On a ``clang`` crash, the compiler will dump a preprocessed file and a script
 | |
| to replay the ``clang`` command. For example, you should see something like
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. code-block:: text
 | |
| 
 | |
|    PLEASE ATTACH THE FOLLOWING FILES TO THE BUG REPORT:
 | |
|    Preprocessed source(s) and associated run script(s) are located at:
 | |
|    clang: note: diagnostic msg: /tmp/foo-xxxxxx.c
 | |
|    clang: note: diagnostic msg: /tmp/foo-xxxxxx.sh
 | |
| 
 | |
| The `creduce <https://github.com/csmith-project/creduce>`_ tool helps to
 | |
| reduce the preprocessed file down to the smallest amount of code that still
 | |
| replicates the problem. You're encouraged to use creduce to reduce the code
 | |
| to make the developers' lives easier. The
 | |
| ``clang/utils/creduce-clang-crash.py`` script can be used on the files
 | |
| that clang dumps to help with automating creating a test to check for the
 | |
| compiler crash.
 | |
| 
 | |
| `cvise <https://github.com/marxin/cvise>`_ is an alternative to ``creduce``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _middleend-crash:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Middle-end optimization bugs
 | |
| ----------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you find that a bug crashes in the optimizer, compile your test-case to a
 | |
| ``.bc`` file by passing "``-emit-llvm -O1 -Xclang -disable-llvm-passes -c -o
 | |
| foo.bc``". The ``-O1`` is important because ``-O0`` adds the ``optnone``
 | |
| function attribute to all functions and many passes don't run on ``optnone``
 | |
| functions. Then run:
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. code-block:: bash
 | |
| 
 | |
|    opt -O3 foo.bc -disable-output
 | |
| 
 | |
| If this doesn't crash, please follow the instructions for a :ref:`front-end
 | |
| bug <frontend-crash>`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| If this does crash, then you should be able to debug this with the following
 | |
| :doc:`bugpoint <Bugpoint>` command:
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. code-block:: bash
 | |
| 
 | |
|    bugpoint foo.bc -O3
 | |
| 
 | |
| Run this, then file a bug with the instructions and reduced .bc
 | |
| files that bugpoint emits.
 | |
| 
 | |
| If bugpoint doesn't reproduce the crash, ``llvm-reduce`` is an alternative
 | |
| way to reduce LLVM IR. Create a script that repros the crash and run:
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. code-block:: bash
 | |
| 
 | |
|    llvm-reduce --test=path/to/script foo.bc
 | |
| 
 | |
| which should produce reduced IR that reproduces the crash. Be warned the
 | |
| ``llvm-reduce`` is still fairly immature and may crash.
 | |
| 
 | |
| If none of the above work, you can get the IR before a crash by running the
 | |
| ``opt`` command with the ``--print-before-all --print-module-scope`` flags to
 | |
| dump the IR before every pass. Be warned that this is very verbose.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _backend-crash:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Backend code generator bugs
 | |
| ---------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you find a bug that crashes clang in the code generator, compile your
 | |
| source file to a .bc file by passing "``-emit-llvm -c -o foo.bc``" to
 | |
| clang (in addition to the options you already pass).  Once your have
 | |
| foo.bc, one of the following commands should fail:
 | |
| 
 | |
| #. ``llc foo.bc``
 | |
| #. ``llc foo.bc -relocation-model=pic``
 | |
| #. ``llc foo.bc -relocation-model=static``
 | |
| 
 | |
| If none of these crash, please follow the instructions for a :ref:`front-end
 | |
| bug<frontend-crash>`. If one of these do crash, you should be able to reduce
 | |
| this with one of the following :doc:`bugpoint <Bugpoint>` command lines (use
 | |
| the one corresponding to the command above that failed):
 | |
| 
 | |
| #. ``bugpoint -run-llc foo.bc``
 | |
| #. ``bugpoint -run-llc foo.bc --tool-args -relocation-model=pic``
 | |
| #. ``bugpoint -run-llc foo.bc --tool-args -relocation-model=static``
 | |
| 
 | |
| Please run this, then file a bug with the instructions and reduced .bc file
 | |
| that bugpoint emits.  If something goes wrong with bugpoint, please submit
 | |
| the "foo.bc" file and the option that llc crashes with.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _miscompiling:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Miscompilations
 | |
| ===============
 | |
| 
 | |
| If clang successfully produces an executable, but that executable doesn't run
 | |
| right, this is either a bug in the code or a bug in the compiler. The first
 | |
| thing to check is to make sure it is not using undefined behavior (e.g.
 | |
| reading a variable before it is defined). In particular, check to see if the
 | |
| program is clean under various `sanitizers
 | |
| <https://github.com/google/sanitizers>`_ (e.g. ``clang
 | |
| -fsanitize=undefined,address``) and `valgrind <http://valgrind.org/>`_. Many
 | |
| "LLVM bugs" that we have chased down ended up being bugs in the program being
 | |
| compiled, not LLVM.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Once you determine that the program itself is not buggy, you should choose
 | |
| which code generator you wish to compile the program with (e.g. LLC or the JIT)
 | |
| and optionally a series of LLVM passes to run.  For example:
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. code-block:: bash
 | |
| 
 | |
|    bugpoint -run-llc [... optzn passes ...] file-to-test.bc --args -- [program arguments]
 | |
| 
 | |
| bugpoint will try to narrow down your list of passes to the one pass that
 | |
| causes an error, and simplify the bitcode file as much as it can to assist
 | |
| you. It will print a message letting you know how to reproduce the
 | |
| resulting error.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The :doc:`OptBisect <OptBisect>` page shows an alternative method for finding
 | |
| incorrect optimization passes.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Incorrect code generation
 | |
| =========================
 | |
| 
 | |
| Similarly to debugging incorrect compilation by mis-behaving passes, you
 | |
| can debug incorrect code generation by either LLC or the JIT, using
 | |
| ``bugpoint``. The process ``bugpoint`` follows in this case is to try to
 | |
| narrow the code down to a function that is miscompiled by one or the other
 | |
| method, but since for correctness, the entire program must be run,
 | |
| ``bugpoint`` will compile the code it deems to not be affected with the C
 | |
| Backend, and then link in the shared object it generates.
 | |
| 
 | |
| To debug the JIT:
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. code-block:: bash
 | |
| 
 | |
|    bugpoint -run-jit -output=[correct output file] [bitcode file]  \
 | |
|             --tool-args -- [arguments to pass to lli]              \
 | |
|             --args -- [program arguments]
 | |
| 
 | |
| Similarly, to debug the LLC, one would run:
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. code-block:: bash
 | |
| 
 | |
|    bugpoint -run-llc -output=[correct output file] [bitcode file]  \
 | |
|             --tool-args -- [arguments to pass to llc]              \
 | |
|             --args -- [program arguments]
 | |
| 
 | |
| **Special note:** if you are debugging MultiSource or SPEC tests that
 | |
| already exist in the ``llvm/test`` hierarchy, there is an easier way to
 | |
| debug the JIT, LLC, and CBE, using the pre-written Makefile targets, which
 | |
| will pass the program options specified in the Makefiles:
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. code-block:: bash
 | |
| 
 | |
|    cd llvm/test/../../program
 | |
|    make bugpoint-jit
 | |
| 
 | |
| At the end of a successful ``bugpoint`` run, you will be presented
 | |
| with two bitcode files: a *safe* file which can be compiled with the C
 | |
| backend and the *test* file which either LLC or the JIT
 | |
| mis-codegenerates, and thus causes the error.
 | |
| 
 | |
| To reproduce the error that ``bugpoint`` found, it is sufficient to do
 | |
| the following:
 | |
| 
 | |
| #. Regenerate the shared object from the safe bitcode file:
 | |
| 
 | |
|    .. code-block:: bash
 | |
| 
 | |
|       llc -march=c safe.bc -o safe.c
 | |
|       gcc -shared safe.c -o safe.so
 | |
| 
 | |
| #. If debugging LLC, compile test bitcode native and link with the shared
 | |
|    object:
 | |
| 
 | |
|    .. code-block:: bash
 | |
| 
 | |
|       llc test.bc -o test.s
 | |
|       gcc test.s safe.so -o test.llc
 | |
|       ./test.llc [program options]
 | |
| 
 | |
| #. If debugging the JIT, load the shared object and supply the test
 | |
|    bitcode:
 | |
| 
 | |
|    .. code-block:: bash
 | |
| 
 | |
|       lli -load=safe.so test.bc [program options]
 |