31cbe0f240
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned. As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do. This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| clear.pass.cpp | ||
| emplace.pass.cpp | ||
| emplace_hint.pass.cpp | ||
| erase_iter.pass.cpp | ||
| erase_iter_iter.pass.cpp | ||
| erase_key.pass.cpp | ||
| extract_iterator.pass.cpp | ||
| extract_key.pass.cpp | ||
| insert_allocator_requirements.pass.cpp | ||
| insert_cv.pass.cpp | ||
| insert_initializer_list.pass.cpp | ||
| insert_iter_cv.pass.cpp | ||
| insert_iter_iter.pass.cpp | ||
| insert_iter_rv.pass.cpp | ||
| insert_node_type.pass.cpp | ||
| insert_node_type_hint.pass.cpp | ||
| insert_rv.pass.cpp | ||
| merge.pass.cpp | ||