31cbe0f240
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned. As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do. This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| divides.pass.cpp | ||
| minus.pass.cpp | ||
| modulus.pass.cpp | ||
| multiplies.pass.cpp | ||
| negate.pass.cpp | ||
| plus.pass.cpp | ||
| transparent.pass.cpp | ||