![]() Quite a few libcxx tests seem to follow the format: #if _LIBCPP_STD_VER > X // Do test. #else // Empty test. #endif We should instead use the UNSUPPORTED lit directive to exclude the test on earlier C++ standards. This gives us a more accurate number of test passes for those standards and avoids unnecessary conflicts with other lit directives on the same tests. Reviewers: bcraig, ericwf, mclow.lists Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20730 llvm-svn: 271108 |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
bool.pass.cpp | ||
dereference.pass.cpp | ||
dereference_const.pass.cpp | ||
op_arrow.pass.cpp | ||
op_arrow_const.pass.cpp | ||
value.pass.cpp | ||
value_const.fail.cpp | ||
value_const.pass.cpp | ||
value_or.pass.cpp | ||
value_or_const.pass.cpp |